Quote from: Zed0X on May 12, 2024, 05:32:16 PM

Kambosos got schooled, he would have lost even if he wasn't TKO'd from the body shots. I don' t know what happened to him during the fight but maybe Lomachenko's constant pressure got to him.

It would be a wide margin decision win for Loma if Kambosos wasn't KOed, that was my expectation. Kambosos was frustrated that he can't hit Loma with his power punch while Loma hit him at will whenever and wherever Loma wants. That was Loma's style, goes to the head first then dig in the body on the championship rounds. That liver shot was not a lucky punch as that was also the punch that KOed Jorge Linares.

the footwork is making a huge difference in their fight. Loma is just better at it. and i thought he will actually lose this fight so i bet for Georgy.
what surfaces this time however is that its Tank Davis is Loma's next fight. this time this will divide fans whether which is which. while i like Tank, Loma shows he still got it and can deliver his will.

Tank vs Loma is still in progress if could change to Shakur.   i think Tank is too much for Loma. Shakur vs Loma will give the fans about 12 rounds of because they are both good at avoiding getting hit. Shakurt however is not a finisher.

It is true that a huge amount of electricity is lost every year and that it is about 50 000 TWh, and that for comparison BTC mining consumes somewhere around 200 TWh, which refutes any crazy claim that Bitcoin can have anything to do with a serious impact on the environment. Therefore, any use of what would otherwise be completely useless has a positive effect on the economy of a country and creates additional value.

Politicians are just exploiting the energy issue of the BTC network to polish their names and get more exposure in the media. At this point, I don't believe they still think that BTC has no value at all for the world, they are just trying to fool those who support their outdated views on BTC.

While energy is not enough for everyone, we still have a lot of wasted energy, I think it would be better if it could be tokenized into BTC for value storage and protection. My country, Vietnam, also has a lot of wasted solar energy, many power plants have to discharge electricity because the transmission system cannot meet the large capacity, I wish these power plants would operate their own BTC mining farms to utilize the surplus energy, create additional income for themselves and tax revenue for the country's development.

Quote

Лично у меня была политика дождаться что покажет типо "пилотный" проект.Сейчас таки присмотрюсь более основательно,первый на очереди у меня Блум или как там правильно.Тот который бывшие манагеры Бинанса делают и который собирается биржу в телеге запускать.

quote]Из этих мне НОТ больше всех понравился, по-моему, максимально добротно сделан. Notcoin я упустил что-то, тоже думал, посмотрю, чем закончится. Минус такой тактики в том, что одно хорошее упускаем, а что за ним следом идёт - не всегда такого же качества. Yescoin & Bittonвыглядят неплохо, каждый по-своемы тапается-тыкается. Но в конечном счёте это неважно. Всё зависит от того, как залистятся.
  Но вроде немонета уже торгуется?

нет вроде
-----------

Чёто у меня много пролётов по ретро. Дрифт и Гиперликвид мозг епут. Дрифт типа чекнул награды и на этом успокоился. Гиперликвид вообще ничего не дал, просто фарм закочил. Точнее, дал копейки по своему местному мемкойну $PURR или как там его.
   Щас вот вроде Зета маркетс закончили и тоже непонятно, что  будет... если так беспонтово пойдёт, то набивать объёмы во фьчах как-то неинтересно становится... Комсу жгёшь, а из отдач даже спасибо не говорят).

Я думаю по Гиперликвиду не было ещё финальной награды,тот мемкоин так между дел.Ну видишь тут раз на раз не приходится,сейчас bouncebit.io раздал, я получил 25% от вложенной суммы.Правда они придумали всем гемор в виде токена который вернули всем взад,стейкали FDUSD а назад получили BBUSD,типо стейбл их сети но в бнб.Так что надо быть готовым ко всему.

In the part about censorship resistance, he drops this gem:

Quote

Maybe in a few years, we will come to the conclusion that we should separate money from the state for the same reason we separated the church from the state

This is also what Satoshi wanted when he created BTC: a currency that is not dependent on any individual or organization. However, this is quite difficult to achieve for many reasons, and at present we do not see BTC becoming a currency, it is still considered a commodity, asset or investment related to technology.

Governments will not give up their right to print money because the right to print money is as important as the right to control the army. The right to print money allows governments to manage the economy in the way they think is best for the time being, even though it always creates serious inflation. I think we still have to accept one fact in near future: crypto will not be able to replace fiat, crypto will temporarily remain just an investment tool while blockchain gradually becomes a data storage technology.

When investing, it's best to do it in lots of coins if you want to be successful in the crypto world. BTC is a favorite coin and safe to hold, but many altcoins make bigger profits than bitcoin. Everyone has their own analysis and strategy. Good luck

I believe the number of coins is not as important as their potential. Just one investment in SOL in 2020 has generated more profit than a portfolio of dozens of other tokens like EOS, NEO, TRX, LTC... At the same time, I believe that each investor should only have a few coins in their portfolio so that they can follow the project's development and make timely decisions.

BTC has recovered better than most ALTS in the market, so even though BTC price has x4 from the bottom, many ALTS investors are still losing money or have no significant profits. This is completely normal before the halving: money is still flowing into BTC. Everything may change after the halving and the market will enter altseason, I hope many ALTS will rise stronger than BTC and bring profits to investors.