Quote from: bitbit97 on April 18, 2024, 04:05:32 PM

Dont you find it funny, that "no risk = no gain" can simultaneously be "risk = no gain", but it almost unlikely to be "no risk = gain" situation? That no matter how much you risk you can still lose. Originally it suppose to mean that you cant achieve without trying, but it turns that you can try, spend time money and still fail. To this quote, I would like to add the word regret. This would suit perfectly as a motivation and a lighthouse for every gambler. No matter how you play, how you deal with your money and how your life is going, a person should never regret what he did. This is his life lesson, experience and he should accept it no matter if it is bad or good.

And what if there are rare instances like receiving an unexpected inheritance where "no risk = gain" does indeed seem plausible
However, as you noted typically to gain something substantial one must be willing to take a risk whether it be of time, money or effort.
Each situation demands a unique approach to risk and how we manage that risk often defines our outcomes.
I agree with your perspective on regret as well. Every experience, whether positive or negative shapes us. Embracing each as an invaluable lesson allows us to transform our experiences into strengths.

What happens is that when things like inheritance are something inevitable, there is no risk, but it is a great loss that is suffered, so everything has its risk and effort in the same way, so this is something that will always be noticed, Personally, I say something, in everything in life you Must take risks in order to have some profits, and the most you can do is lose the rest if it goes well , then you win and big, so what happens is not bad. This also applies in the casino, when we play we know that money is at risk, in investments and everywhere, in gambling the risk is much stronger, there are people who have lost everything because they do not know how to control themselves, that is something This happens to many players and is what should be Avoided.

Fun fact!!  Na money wey you save today go save you tommorow 😁

E be like say this statement nor too make sense again because after you dun use all the money you save finish, na better broke you go broke. Na money wey you invest today go save you tomorrow because money invested go fit yield enough returns to solve many problems. Save money o, but nor save money blindly, after savings dun mature, try invest the money.

1. Is this as a result of low /lack of signature campaign
2. Or it's because of the low traffic that there's low number of campaigns
3. Or maybe both
4. Or The forum is still it's growing phase and haven't gotten to the height of having active users per hour in Thousands or reached campaigns that would be interested in promoting their product.

All the possibilities that you foresee here refer to the number of campaigns. Here I would add one more option
5. There are not enough members here who will publish quality posts and thus attract new businesses to promote themselves through campaigns.

Additionally,  I think there are too many boards and it is difficult to find topics and to find the correct place to post it.

Questions from newbies  like "I lost my ethereum using phantom and metamask  please help" are very good for SEEO, and we don't have those here..

This is the essence.
If this forum wants to grow, not only "rich" campaigns are enough, but also content that will be useful to others outside the forum. It is full of discussions dealing with speculations and what will happen if... No one searches for such things.

Also, it seems to me that forcing bounty and earning possibilities as the primary thing on the forum obviously does not produce results. As far as I can see, that part of the forum is quite inactive or occasionally some campaigns appear for which there is no interest.

A few days ago I was looking for a good place to open a discussion about some services, I believe that such topics have no place in any "discussion" section.

In general, I think that mixer campaigns may continue here for a long time, so at least we can guarantee that traffic will not drop severely.

For mixers, these are relatively cheap campaigns, even if compared to what they paid on Btt, on that side they can last much longer. However, at some point when they evaluate the results, it does not mean that they will continue if they are not satisfied.

The anonymity is the best in the crypto community but to some extent we are still identifying some members through the identification of the country base their accent and locale the person comes from. Recently my country government asked Binance to release the uses of the exchange in the country to them but Binance refused. And if the government had an assessed and access the users database then many people that are in the cryptocurrency ecosystem Bank accounts would been blocked, banned and stopped from operating. But the anonymity helps us.

As others might have to say, this is just a slap on the wrist.

The judge though could be sympathetic to CZ obviously because of the light sentence. Maybe he has form his own opinion that CZ didn't do it deliberately with regards to money laundering or not have a program in Binance to prevent it. And he pleaded guilty and we all know that in US justice system, admitting to it and there could be some plea deals from behind.

To let's say compare to SBF which we see that he knows what he is doing, but ignore everything and play God mode with his customers money.