FDUSD volatily

[GerbertPhills]

I am analyzing the FDUSD volatily and I can see that it always goes up to 1.0030+ when there is a launchpool announced and then dips to 0.9980 areas when it's finished.
 
However, there seem to be other factors that make it go up and down.
 
Since BTC/FDUSD is fee free and BTC/USDT is not, my assumption that perhaps has to do with users accumulating FDUSD for some reason to buy BTC later or leverage it or something like that. But that's just an assumption.
 
Did anyone make a decent research on the topic? 
Couldn't find anything useful on Google about it.

[hugeblack]

You describe it as volatily, but this is how stablecoins work. Stablecoins try to maintain a pegged value, which is $1, but the type of security they support, the demand, supply, and liquidity of the market is what makes it always difficult to get a price of $1, but rather a price range near $1. The narrower this price range is around $1, the more stable the currency is.



This article is good for understanding what I mean ----> https://members.delphidigital.io/reports/your-guide-to-the-collateralized-stablecoin-landscape#stability-and-preference

[Peter90]

I am analyzing the FDUSD volatily and I can see that it always goes up to 1.0030+ when there is a launchpool announced and then dips to 0.9980 areas when it's finished.
 
However, there seem to be other factors that make it go up and down.
 
Since BTC/FDUSD is fee free and BTC/USDT is not, my assumption that perhaps has to do with users accumulating FDUSD for some reason to buy BTC later or leverage it or something like that. But that's just an assumption.
 
Did anyone make a decent research on the topic? 
Couldn't find anything useful on Google about it.

Hi Gerbert
According to my categorisation (see The 6 Types of Stablecoins) FDUSD belongs to the 4th category:
4. Stablecoins backed by financial products

From the article mentioned by HB:
"Those (Stablecoins) backed with more volatile collateral assets were more susceptible to going off-peg, compared to those with more stable assets backing it"

FDUSD is not backed by US dollars but by financial assets.
As the value of the assets backing FDUSD changes, it's normal that the value of the coin changes as well, losing its peg to the $

[hugeblack]

FDUSD is not backed by US dollars but by financial assets.
As the value of the assets backing FDUSD changes, it's normal that the value of the coin changes as well, losing its peg to the $

These financial assets are a form of USD, where instead of there being 1:1 token:USD in stablecoin bank account for each token minted, there are enough assets to liquidate them when there is a shortage of deposits, and these assets are always easy to liquidate, such as treasury bonds and some stocks, so if If any legal problems occur, it may be difficult to sell these assets, leading to big crash.


in short it is still backed by USD.

[GerbertPhills]

Thanks for the explanations, guys.
But in practice the biggest growth of FDUSD is ALWAYS coming from the Launchpool. Since you can stake FDUSD when launchpool is announced users are buying FDUSD to stake it and it brings the price above 1.0030+.

That's one possible reason.

I was wondering if there are others such as this one, EXCEPT external factors that you mentioned..

[hugeblack]

Thanks for the explanations, guys.
But in practice the biggest growth of FDUSD is ALWAYS coming from the Launchpool. Since you can stake FDUSD when launchpool is announced users are buying FDUSD to stake it and it brings the price above 1.0030+.

I agree, I think that after banning BUSD, Binance is trying to make a strong return to the stablecoin market and the best way to do that is Binance Launchpool, as their strategy aims to reduce dependence on USDT and promote FDUSD, so by using this strategy you profit about $15 for every $1,000 invested, but on the other hand, FDUSD You gain more liquidity and grow, and after it becomes big enough Binance will stop giving you these easy profits.
Staking FDUSD may be profitable, but believe me, all similar experiments ended in something bad.

[MrSpasybo]

I agree, I think that after banning BUSD, Binance is trying to make a strong return to the stablecoin market and the best way to do that is Binance Launchpool, as their strategy aims to reduce dependence on USDT and promote FDUSD, so by using this strategy you profit about $15 for every $1,000 invested, but on the other hand, FDUSD You gain more liquidity and grow, and after it becomes big enough Binance will stop giving you these easy profits.
Staking FDUSD may be profitable, but believe me, all similar experiments ended in something bad.

Yeah, following BUSD and TUSD, FDUSD has been selected by Binance for special benefits on Binance including free trading + airdrop in launchpools. Perhaps Binance wants to support First Digital and FDUSD, as well as add more interesting features for Binance CEX users. FDUSD price movements are very stable with a spread of less than 1%, FDUSD reserves are also reported monthly by Prescient, we can all refer to and trust the potential of this new stablecoin.

FDUSD marketcap is currently only around $4.5B, I believe that with the help of Binance, FDUSD marketcap will soon grow as strong as BUSD in the past.

• FDUSD: March 2024 report

[hugeblack]

FDUSD: March 2024 report

I read the report and it seemed exciting, but what caught my attention is that their assets are distributed between cash and US Treasury bonds, without focusing on assets that may increase in value but are difficult to liquidize, such as debts and real estate.
It's good but it will make FDUSD highly centralized and more vulnerable to legal challenges and authorities can easily control it by freezing bank accounts.