Do you like to participate in ICOs that require KYC?

[Domithra]

Why not? If only the ICO is worth joining, KYC is not a big problem for me. KYC is just for verification purposes and if the ICO is able to promise the safe keeping of all collected data and will only use them for verification purposes in order to check for double entry, bots, terrorism funding etc, then i join without hesitation.

[wahyunyarobiyanto]

Yes, with KYC manager can know which account is real or fake.
So it's better to anticipate the double or tuyul account used by people to earn a double profit .

[April21]

KYC is the final requirement to get the token, but with KYC is sometimes troublesome because we are actually working to make a post with target post per Sunday must give up tokens that are not accepted because KYC is not approved.
KYC is actually good to anticipate tuyul account, but it would be better if the KYC is in a bounty thread for our work is not in vain and does not leave disappointed in the end .

[owmivmen]

If I think ico is potentially and have a good future I think I will do it. KYC is very easy and everyone can do it.

[SuccessManiac]

I dont think KYC should be something that should deter you from investing in an ICO. The sucess of an ICO does not depend on whether it requires KYC or not.

[rightway]

Yes of course but it depends on the KYC requirements because some ICOs are not strict and the requirements is easy to comply.

[Andruha1993]

I do not like when ICO projects require KYC, because it takes a lot of time to check. But usually, projects that ask to pass KYC pay a good reward.

[Niteroy]

Recently, almost all ICOs have asked to pass KYC to be able to purchase the project's tokens. I think when the project has serious intentions, it tries to comply with the legal requirements of the financial regulators of the country in which it is registered and therefore asks to pass KYC.

[Stormyblue]

Why not? If only the ICO is worth joining, KYC is not a big problem for me. KYC is just for verification purposes and if the ICO is able to promise the safe keeping of all collected data and will only use them for verification purposes in order to check for double entry, bots, terrorism funding etc, then i join without hesitation.

KYC is attributed to the authenticity of an ICO. Terrorism is an important factor in KYCs.
Genereally I think KYC positions an ICO very well in the crypto space.

[Marivic27]

Why not? If only the ICO is worth joining, KYC is not a big problem for me. KYC is just for verification purposes and if the ICO is able to promise the safe keeping of all collected data and will only use them for verification purposes in order to check for double entry, bots, terrorism funding etc, then i join without hesitation.

KYC is attributed to the authenticity of an ICO. Terrorism is an important factor in KYCs.
Genereally I think KYC positions an ICO very well in the crypto space.

Yes i agree on that kyc is required because it has a great reason knowing costumer is really a good way in crypto. It is also safe of the ico required kyc, and i think it is not a problem as long as we have identification card it is really simple to creat kyc.

[Gastonic]

Yes. Its a great indicator that they are following the laws on investment so basically they are legit if they follow that rule.

[eldial]

Yes of course If I have a chances to participate in ICO I am so interested about this because I want to know and learned about ICO responsibility that require KYC and hopefully I can finish this my ambition.

[marcsymons]

Yes I do because as long as we are real persons and there are nothing to hide about our selves then i would love to submit my KYC documents. Just make sure that the ICO is 100% legit and very promising to make your investments to grow then i will participate without doubt.

[jings009]

If you want to participate ICO that required KYC make sure provide the document on the trusted ico and company only. You would never provide your data to theft and they could be used your document for the illegal purposes.

[Dacosta]

I strongly disagree with this. Project managers do not regard bounty hunters as investors so I do not see the need to require them to do KYC before paying them their bounty tokens