Bounty managers for articles and videos

[lesnik_utsa]

I decided to try to collect my thoughts in a heap and disassemble the most adequate and not very bounty managers by content. By content, I mean writing articles and creating videos. Of course, everyone has a different approach, a different attitude towards scams and repost, and not everyone tries to go to meet the bountyists. I will put my own assessment of each manager from 0 to 10 and describe the work of only those with whom I dealt. Also, there will naturally be no managers from the #DevelopmentTeam , as this does not make sense. So let's go:
olcaytu2005 (6 out of 10) - Many swear at him and the whole team of tokensuite, but I liked working with him. The first company I participated in was DAOstack, where I got a pretty good mark for my article and a minus for the video (since there was a very bad and quiet sound) - after filling out the "inconsistencies" form, olcaytu2005 changed its decision and gave me the minimum points for the video. But that's not the point, I see that the team has a lot of problems with the bounty participant, but on the whole, they are all resolved pretty quickly. Of course, a big minus is that a lot of scam work at tokensuite, but here every bounty participant should choose not only a manager but also his own analysis.
plus:
convenient form with objections and quick problem solving;
fairly fast work with tables.
minuses:
a lot of scam in companies;
poor job of identifying scammers.
SANDRA EVANS (9 out of 10) - If you know how to work with it correctly, then there should be no problems. I think the most adequate manager of all existing content. Any question is always decided in a personal telegram, you can even ask for advice. The choice of companies is very good, frank scam except for Buzkoin not yet noticed. SANDRA EVANS quite well assesses the quality of content, scammers do not particularly like it. Checks YouTube services and writes you a "fine" for the first time for cheating, the second time a ban on all companies.
plus:
good technical support;
promising companies, most of which are already present on the exchanges;
quick work with tables and distribution of tokens.
minuses:
sometimes not all scammers go to the guillotine;
articles and videos are always in 1 pool;
in recent companies, it is difficult to get a bonus.
BlockEye (3 out of 10) - I took part in 1 company NPER for which 60% of the pool was initially allocated to articles and there was a restriction on the participants and a hard selection for these participants (I apologize for tautology). As a result, the pool was cut to about 10 percent without explanation. As if he himself took the difference change in the pool.
plus:
tokens have reached the wallet.
minuses:
change of conditions on the go;
small payments;
there is no normal feedback.
yahoo62278 (3 out of 10) - I participated in 1 company MOZO and thought that yahoo62278 is quite an adequate manager. As a result, before counting the tokens, it was announced that those who did not write the authentication post will not be accepted (the information about this was written in small fine print in the topic) After trying to reach the manager in the telegram and prove that you fill out a special form for registering your work (it was very problematic to do so, since the answer from him does not come) it was revealed that all 1512 articles will receive an equal number of tokens. That is, he decided not to check out the articles, not to screen out the scammers, but just to count everyone. In this regard, it was decided to put pressure on him and demand a recalculation of the spreadsheet by a group of initiative bounty activists, which he did, he bothered to start checking the articles. As a result, justice was achieved!
plus:
pretty good companies bounty.
minuses:
terrible attitude towards  bounty participants;
lack of feedback;
bad table counting.
btcltcdigger (6 out of 10) Quite an interesting manager, to whom many bountists are positive. Each company has different conditions for the content and there is a very good pool. In general, the manager has a lot of companies and checks tables take a long time. I chose between 5 and 6, but still, this is quite adequate compared to some other managers.
plus:
feedback is present;
there are some good bounty companies.
minuses:
long counting tables;
takes a lot of repost even on video.
Arteezy.rtx (7 out of 10) I participated in 1 company Darcmatter and everything was fine until the delivery of tokens. The number of tokens sent to all participants in the bounty did not coincide with the number in the final table. At first, I received less than expected and after discussing this situation with the manager, in summary, I received 50 percent more than it was in the table. Most likely the tokens were sent by the team, not the manager, so there was confusion
plus:
fast feedback;
good projects;
fight with scammers.
minuses:
withdrawing responsibility from yourself;
closing the topic a few days before the end of the bounty (maybe it was the decision of the team that eventually opened the topic the next day).
AMAZIX (6 out of 10) Many plus and cons. A fairly large pool of content (at least 30 percent) with an objective assessment of the work. Previously, for foreign languages, it was necessary to have a special permit with a whitelist, now in new companies, they decided to abandon the majority of the bountists and switch to VIP content.
plus:
good company bounty (little scam);
pretty big payouts.
minuses:
transition to VIP content;
bad feedback;
very long tables are checked;
Krypital (6 out of 10) Usually, guys have very high projects, which is both a plus and a minus at the same time. Projects usually shoot at the moon but pennies are made for content since there are a lot of people who want to participate and almost everyone who wants to get points.
plus:
excellent company bounty;
feedback is present.
minuses:
excellent bounty company;
small payments;
few bounty companies.
ZAPO (5 out of 10) I have not received any payments from him yet, as content in the company Multiversum is checked for a very long time, but the quality of the check is pretty good, let's see what the final will be.
plus:
fairly objective assessment of work;
there is always feedback.
minuses:
very long work inspection;
difficult to communicate because he is arrogant
does not always go to the side of the bountists.

I also wanted to describe the bounty sites, but I will not break the rules of this forum, which I really like. Guys - I wish you all success and profit.

At this point I’ll probably stop if there are any additions, write - I’ll update the post. In general, of course, you have to fight for each of your tokens and keep a close eye on companies, but again, personally, my opinion is that you need to select the bounty more carefully and the result will be.

[I-Bit]

It is a very great review of bounty managers. You describe them almost in detail, and I can see the strength and weakness of them. Yeah, you are right, some of bounty managers have terrible attitudes towards participants. I think not only yahoo62278, btcltcdigger also has a bad attitude. Thank you for sharing this information. +1 for you..

[lesnik_utsa]

It is a very great review of bounty managers. You describe them almost in detail, and I can see the strength and weakness of them. Yeah, you are right, some of bounty managers have terrible attitudes towards participants. I think not only yahoo62278, btcltcdigger also has a bad attitude. Thank you for sharing this information. +1 for you..

The problem is that the majority of people do not want to share their experiences and tell people about it. Here, too, many simply receive information and are silent. And it is in the interests of all to develop further and improve this forum ...

[alltalk]

Nice to see your information about bounty manager. I hope many altcoinstalks members will respond it and share their experiences. By the way, why do you choose a bounty manager for articles and videos on your review? Do you have a specific reason?     

[Andruha1993]

Thank you for such a great review of bounty campaign managers. With great pleasure I read about each manager and somewhere I fully agree with you, somewhere I don’t!

[Zed0X]

Not about article and video campaigns but I have participated in social media bounties managed my Sandra Evans, Arteezy, Amazix, and Btcltcdigger. The best so far is btcltcdigger. 

[lesnik_utsa]

Nice to see your information about bounty manager. I hope many altcoinstalks members will respond it and share their experiences. By the way, why do you choose a bounty manager for articles and videos on your review? Do you have a specific reason?   

It is very difficult to answer this question. This deserves a separate big topic. I personally analyze a lot of parameters and do not choose a bounty campaign just because of the Manager

[arkawa040]

Sandra Evans is actually the most competent of all the listed managers, she always tries to help her followers as much as possible, I would give Sandra 10 out of 10)

[Shahinaz]

I like this post, plus minus for the content,
in my opinion, the content in Sandra is really true about quality content, but  is very unfortunate for the content I pay attention to is that only Russian is accepted for English, it is difficult unless the content is really worthy of the eyes of Sandra and the team.

[Dacosta]

Nice post. But I disagree to the statement that Amazix do objective assessment of the articles. Their ratings to articles are subjected. The comments given after rejecting your article are not reasonable enough. Their rejection rate is too high so I have stopped participating in their bounties.

[Carbitcoin]

Nice post. But I disagree to the statement that Amazix do objective assessment of the articles. Their ratings to articles are subjected. The comments given after rejecting your article are not reasonable enough. Their rejection rate is too high so I have stopped participating in their bounties.

The fact is that recently there have been new platforms or Bounty groups that produce management for Bounty companies. Among them it is very difficult to choose the best, because Everyone has some flaws. Nevertheless, I can’t say anything bad about the AmaZix managers, because they somehow fulfill their tasks.

[tamango]

Thanks for sharing your experience. I did very few youtube bounties but many social ones and SandraEvans and btcltcdigger are my favorite  bounty managers.

[jokowidodo]

My opinion yahoo62278 is best bounty campaign manager so far, almost of bounty campaign manage by him always success not only for selling ico coin but also success after listing at the exchange market.

[Cryptoz]

My opinion yahoo62278 is best bounty campaign manager so far, almost of bounty campaign manage by him always success not only for selling ico coin but also success after listing at the exchange market.

You are true. yahoo62278 is a veteran bounty manager with a trusted reputation. He always provides high quality of ICOs bounty. But unfortunately, sometimes his attitude is a little temperament.   

[JSD10M]

I like this thread. I will use this as reference whenever I will look for a bounty campaign to join. Thank you