Should we limit members in one campaign?

[Primo1760]

It is not uncommon to have more people in a campaign.  It can work as it pleases in today's competitive market.  Everyone has a priority to do this.  This is your misconception.

[Abubakar56]

Limiting member is very important in bounty so that to limit people that are going to participate!!! When there are too much people in a campaign we endup being paid little amount even after working for months.

[zulfi125]

No doubt some users making a good amount of tokens to spam multi-account, but if the bounty manager will check carefully and proof of authentication will provide for every bounty, then there is less chance to join for a spammer; this is a good idea for participants limit then will be handsome tokens for participants instead of a little number of tokens.

[monig18]

It should be limited but minimum number of participants should be minimum 500. In some Bounties it is limited to 50 or 100 , which is not fair.Everyone should have a chance to join.

[Emircan]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I think there should be no limit, but should score on your interaction with the campaign who is more interactive, I see the campaign that is known to many people, the value will also increase and the committee. get more when the coins are returned

[gqinyot]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I think there should be no limit, but should score on your interaction with the campaign who is more interactive, I see the campaign that is known to many people, the value will also increase and the committee. get more when the coins are returned

In my opinion, participants should be limited because when there are too many people, the value of the coins will be divided among those who increased the bounty, making the participants no longer when they are paid the desired amount.

[Zulema]

It should be limited but minimum number of participants should be minimum 500. In some Bounties it is limited to 50 or 100 , which is not fair.Everyone should have a chance to join.

I agree with the committee but the project is limited to attendees which makes me dislike because Minh klhong6 has the opportunity to do the project together with me but I believe the following projects will be unlimited because there are many people involved. then a lot of people know to invest as well as to advertise their project

[Hasnain khan]

That will be a smart thought since I have taken an interest in certain missions with set number of individuals and the profits end up being gigantic when contrasted with those with huge numbers. Restricting the quantity of members additionally lessens spam.

[Bravo]

I think is good to limit members in one campaign. As u said earlier  that the bonus are small because of plenty participants.  Those member who are posting in relevant post and are not always  active should be removed. 

[Black96]

I think if the participants are not much then at least the bounty Hunters can earn well to some extent depending on the project.

[TROXIE]

There are some project that defines the limit of participants in their campaign, some even intentionally screen out with ranks, like "you must be at least a senior member to participate", some will intentionally give a high task to meet up with such as 20 post with 150 words and must be spread across 4 days, and many more.This is to make the token more valuable.
If there are many good projects people will have options than rushing of the very few ones always available.