UniJoin.io's use of CoinJoin to anonymize transactions is interesting. While the single, combined transaction with multiple inputs and outputs makes tracing difficult, it relies on a large user pool for effectiveness.

The article mentions a "Wallet Distribution" option. It would be helpful to understand how this distribution is determined. Does it affect anonymity or simply the number of outputs users receive? Additionally, the emphasis on users storing the "letter of guarantee" raises a question.  Without server-side data storage, how can UniJoin.io handle potential disputes or ensure user confidence in case of lost letters?

Let's also explore the claim of random fees between 1% and 3% with four decimal places. Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

Halving is still important, if bitcoin never had a halving we would not see a bullish season after the halving. When miners' rewards are cut, supply is limited and the price of bitcoin rises. Maybe some people say it doesn't affect him, maybe he doesn't follow the 4 year cycle

Satoshi carefully planned bitcoin well, ranging from ;
The method of securing the network;
The incentive and it's halving;
PoW;
Avoidance of double spending;
And lots more.
Satoshi is a genius. And everything he planned and implemented for bitcoin has one way or the other to affect the bitcoin price and Bitcoin network. We shouldn't underrate the power of halving.

a gambling addict will stop if he is aware of it on his own and cannot be forced if it is not from their heart, even if it is religion and family, if they do not have a strong intention to leave gambling

I fully with you. True change does indeed come from within and gambling is no exception. Its essential that the person has a genuine and strong desire to change. I wholeheartedly agree that self awareness is the cornerstone of meaningful and lasting transformation.

Hey team, this looks like a good project, but I'm surprised I haven't heard about it considering that it launched over five years ago.

I'm reading through the initial post and can't help but notice a couple of claims I'd like some clarification on.

The article claims that the platform "does not shuffle available funds in one or multiple pots, but exchanges incoming bitcoins with coins purchased from investors - cryptocurrency exchanges."

What are those investor cryptocurrency exchanges? Are they regular cryptocurrency exchanges, or are there some special investment vehicles set up for this particular purpose?

Also, regarding your process of mixing coins, you wrote: "Our transfer algorithm selects independent investors and trading platforms, and breaks down your funds in a manner that completely removes a link between input and output transactions. We neither require registration nor store logs. Once the mixing is done and the transaction confirmed, the data on processed transactions is deleted. For each mixing request, we issue a digitally signed letter of guarantee, which confirms our obligations to the client."

How can this be independently verified to give users confidence and trust that coins are properly mixed and cannot be traced?

I see there's a lot of attention on the project and an influx of intending users, so I believe this is a valid question that should be addressed.

Bayer Leverkusen have done it again. They scored the equaliser in the 96th minute of the game (additional time was only 5 mins but hey).
As much as they again confirmed their undefeatable aura, I think their performance was not that great and they should seriously consider themselves lucky for earning that 1 point.
The way they lost those first 2 goals was appalling and not what you would expect from the new Champions.
I'm not sure if they get overly relaxed after securing the championship, but they need to put themselves back together and stay focused ahead of the Roma match on Thu.