Quote from: Dr.Bitcoin_Strange on April 23, 2024, 08:20:03 AM

Well I think this adulthood stuff or when a person is considered to be an adult is highly dependent on cultural specific concepts.
You wouldn't be wrong for pointing out how strange it is that people under 18 are prohibited from gambling because they are assumed to be minors, while in some countries,  they're already old enough to handle their own finances and already working for their own money, but we must also consider the majority view,  even in those places where those below 18 are already working, not all of them, in fact,  majority them cannot really manage their emotions very well, especially when it involves losing money, it'll be very easier for them to get addicted faster, than a person who has come of age and has more responsibilities.

Yes it's not always about age, but age comes with experiences,  experiences in various areas of life, and these experiences are mostly what helps you to make some calculated decisions that would've ordinarily put you in jeopardy if you hadn't done it right.

You know, that rule about gambling being able only from 18 is rather strange. Like you have said, there are people who are working while being younger than 18. This they are allowed to handle with money (their salary). A person must be mentally ready to operate with money, when he gets large amount of them. Weekly/monthly salary is not the same as few dollars they get for candies. In addition, some people get drivers license when they are younger than 18. That is also rather high level of responsibility. A careless person can not be a driver. In addition, someone become a parent while not being 18. Being a parent is also a high level of responsibility. And there are those who claim that gambling can be allowed only from 18. Like when person becomes 18, he instantly becomes way smarter than those who are younger than him.

Does anyone have experience with crypto loans? Are there platforms known for having better terms and lower interest rates?

Bất cứ sự kiện nào cũng có 2 mặt mà bác: ngay như các dự án xuất hiện trong các hạng mục cũng có thể không thực sự xứng đáng nhất nhưng đó là sự lựa chọn dựa trên dữ liệu mà CMC sử dụng. Với những nhà đầu tư thiếu kinh nghiệm: mọi thông tin đều có thể nguy hiểm nếu khiến họ mua bán không kiểm soát và không đủ khả năng tự ra quyết định với thị trường.

Điều em quan tâm là những sự kiện như thế này sẽ giúp thúc đẩy sự phát triển của thị trường crypto trong dài hạn, giúp cho những nhà đầu tư nhiều kinh nghiệm và luôn tin tưởng vào thị trường có được lợi nhuận!

Quote

Сегодня как раз слушал лекцию одного разработчика ИИ, так он ванговал, что в Будущем на планете Земля будут проживать 10 миллиардов людей и 100 миллиардов различных роботов, не все из них будут разумными, но все - говорящими.
И он это обосновывал тем, что промышленная революция исчерпала себя. Для нового прорыва уже недостаточно придумывать всякие замысловатые механические рычаги (назовём их так) для облегчения физического труда людей.
Сейчас для развития человечества жизненно необходимо создавать рычаги для увеличения возможностей интеллектуальной деятельности. И скорее всего это сейчас и происходит.
И если в результате мы не погибнем, то потом после эволюционного квантового скачка можем и в космос слетать))

Тут я ещё вижу проблему в том, что с развитием технологий многие люди, даже целые слои населения и даже целые отсталые страны станут ненужными. При сохраняющемся капитализме им нечего будет предложить рынку. Вполне возможно, что они будут востребованы разве что в качестве пушечного мяса для региональных войн и конфликтов. Женщины молодые будут востребованы разве что в качестве проституток. Всё остальное роботы скорее всего будут делать лучше человека. И зачем человечеству будут нужны эти миллиарды кожанных мешков, безнадёжно отставших от эволюции и технического прогресса?
   Разве что возобладает клич "нахуй роботов, назад к природе!"