I think so too because many do not meet the requirements, maybe because the party from HAVA COIN does not know that many users are from the lower class if it's like this for me it's not fair, although I don't have much hope for airdrops like this because it has been proven that airdrops like this do not give so many prizes that the estimated prizes are not much
Most users are not familiar with the Cosmos ecosystem, so they tend to focus on other assets and blockchains. Many prioritize retrodrops and other activities that do not require investments, so they are not interested in airdrops. In our community, many users have reported having 100 or more Atoms in several wallets, as well as other coins needed for airdrops.
Yes, therefore the investment I make in projects like this is only a little, as you said the risk is very high and even if we stake more than 100 Atom tokens it does not guarantee to qualify because most of them are taken from the leaderboard.
From my observation, you don't need a leaderboard when it comes to staking.
It's either you are qualified because you got the minimum requirement of token to be eligible, or not. No leaderboards whatsoever in staking, but it all depends on the amount of tokens you staked.
100 ATOMS is very high already. I have almost 60 ATOMS currently staked and based on my experience, I'm always eligible to every airdrop that includes "staked ATOM" as a requirement. I'm not saying that you need to buy 60, but the higher the coins, the higher the chances.
If you want to be eligible with airdrops on Cosmos Ecosystem, holding ATOM would be better than holding TIA. I'm currently looking on twitter for some legit airdrops for those who are holding ATOM, and I saw some. Soarchain, COOK (possible meme coin again), Elys Network are just some, and many more in the future I believe. Can I also ask you if how many ATOMS you are curerntly holding (that is if you want to disclose it here only).