COPA vs Wright: What's at Stake as the Trial to Determine Satoshi's Identity ...

[ABCbits]

COPA vs Wright: What's at Stake as the Trial to Determine Satoshi's Identity Wraps Up

This week attorneys representing bitcoin developers and the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), an organization that says it is fighting for "freedom from threats" on crypto technology, will tell a judge that Craig S. Wright is not, in fact, Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright, who declared he was Nakamoto in 2016, will close his case arguing he did create what is now the world's largest and most valuable cryptocurrency. Read more here.


After about a month, the trial will be wrapped up soon. I don't know about you, but i think it's obvious COPA will win where i hope it's true it'll legally prevent wright from falsely claim himself as Satoshi. Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

[Charles-Tim]

Is Craig wright Satoshi?

If he is Satoshi, he is very foolish for not been able to prove it. All we needed was not court case but prooves. He was unable to prove anything but giving excuses.

With the email that Sirius released recently, we should know that Wright is not Satoshi.

[ABCbits]

Is Craig wright Satoshi?

If he is Satoshi, he is very foolish for not been able to prove it. All we needed was not court case but prooves. He was unable to prove anything but giving excuses.

On top of that, he got caught performing forgery where he also attempt to shift the blame to someone else. And it seems COPA also plan continue to pursuing wright due to forgery attempt[1].

With the email that Sirius released recently, we should know that Wright is not Satoshi.

His attitude and lack of technical knowledge alone should be enough to make average people convinced that he's not Satoshi.

[1] https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/12/craig-wright-committed-perjury-in-uk-trial-over-satoshi-claims-copa-says/

[TomPluz]

After about a month, the trial will be wrapped up soon. I don't know about you, but i think it's obvious COPA will win where i hope it's true it'll legally prevent wright from falsely claim himself as Satoshi. Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

I am also quite positive that eventually the court will be siding with COPA on this issue so that Craig Wright can finally go home and just cry a river as he would officially be called as NOT Satoshi. Actually, there is nothing new with all the claims of Mr. Wright and his defense even utilized his supposed autism as an advantage which is to me is quite a very low form of strategy. The whole crypto industry is spewing Craig Wright all because we know that he can never be the real Satoshi Nakamoto since he could present any verifiable fact to support his claim. In my view, this man is just seeking fame and riding on the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto as he is sure that even if he will not be recognized to be the real one he can still make good money out of his adventure.

[Z-tight]

Bitcoiners who understand the network already know that Wright isn't Satoshi and it is sad that this case has to even be defended in court, i don't know why Wright continues to pursue this case, harassing BTC developers and crypto firms along the way. As a true bitcoiner i can only hope to see the end of this, which would surely be a total loss for Faketoshi. Wright does not have close to the technical knowledge needed to create something like BTC, and that is all the proof that i need.

[ABCbits]

I am also quite positive that eventually the court will be siding with COPA on this issue so that Craig Wright can finally go home and just cry a river as he would officially be called as NOT Satoshi.

At this point, i don't he'll simply going home and cry. He already spend some time/money and the news state wright can make an appeal.

[dkbit98]

Faketoshi lost his case obviously, but I am sure he is going to continue with his circus show, maybe in other countries.
At this point only his cult supporters trust him with anything, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him back working with vegetables again
Time to forget about this clown:

UK judge said Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin White Paper and was not the person behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

https://decrypt.co/221724/craig-wright-did-not-invent-bitcoin-not-satoshi-nakamoto

Case closed.

[ABCbits]

Faketoshi lost his case obviously, but I am sure he is going to continue with his circus show, maybe in other countries.
At this point only his cult supporters trust him with anything, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him back working with vegetables again
Time to forget about this clown:

UK judge said Dr. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin White Paper and was not the person behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

https://decrypt.co/221724/craig-wright-did-not-invent-bitcoin-not-satoshi-nakamoto

Case closed.

Not closed yet, when faketoshi could appeal and COPA could ask for injustice relief. And i agree we should forget him, at least until he wrongfully attempt to sue someone else again.

[Charles-Tim]

Not closed yet, when faketoshi could appeal and COPA could ask for injustice relief. And i agree we should forget him, at least until he wrongfully attempt to sue someone else again.

Appealing with no concrete evidence. Not just with no concrete evidence but without any evidence. That man is a loser. If he his wise enough, he should know he will fail as he continues to fail. If he appeal for anything about this in court, he will fail again. COPA need to ask for injustice relief. A man that did not create bitcoin that wanted to take the glory and threatening bitcoin developers. But he made name already from it because most people may not know this man if not because of him trying to claim what he is not the owner. Clearly he is a liar.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

COPA vs Wright: What's at Stake as the Trial to Determine Satoshi's Identity Wraps Up

This week attorneys representing bitcoin developers and the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), an organization that says it is fighting for "freedom from threats" on crypto technology, will tell a judge that Craig S. Wright is not, in fact, Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright, who declared he was Nakamoto in 2016, will close his case arguing he did create what is now the world's largest and most valuable cryptocurrency. Read more here.


After about a month, the trial will be wrapped up soon. I don't know about you, but i think it's obvious COPA will win where i hope it's true it'll legally prevent wright from falsely claim himself as Satoshi. Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

COPA will definitely win this case because there have not been any tangible evidence to serve as reason why Wright should win the case, a single man cannot win the entire community of bitcoin, i also thought about this that was it because Satoshi have remained always been anonymous that give the effrontery of Craig claiming to be the creator of bitcoin, unlike the other crypto projects in which we know their creators.   

[Husires]

He has gained undeserved fame, and I believe that this is the main purpose of his claim to be Satoshi, otherwise most of us would not know who Craig S. Wright is. Shouldn't a charge of impersonation be issued as soon as it is proven that he is not Satoshi? This charge is punishable by imprisonment for about 5 years.

[Z-tight]

Not closed yet, when faketoshi could appeal and COPA could ask for injustice relief. And i agree we should forget him, at least until he wrongfully attempt to sue someone else again.

Yeah he might appeal, with how Faketoshi has been behaving all these years, it has now become difficult for us to believe that he would simply accept defeat and go home. He loves the drama, because at this point i believe that Faketoshi knows within himself that he would never win this fake claim, and maybe all these drama and lawsuits just helps him sleep better at night.

[ABCbits]

Not closed yet, when faketoshi could appeal and COPA could ask for injustice relief. And i agree we should forget him, at least until he wrongfully attempt to sue someone else again.

Appealing with no concrete evidence. Not just with no concrete evidence but without any evidence. That man is a loser. If he his wise enough, he should know he will fail as he continues to fail. If he appeal for anything about this in court, he will fail again. COPA need to ask for injustice relief. A man that did not create bitcoin that wanted to take the glory and threatening bitcoin developers. But he made name already from it because most people may not know this man if not because of him trying to claim what he is not the owner. Clearly he is a liar.

It's obvious he's not wise when he pick fight with giant like COPA and talks so much when silence is better option. IMO he's going to "double down" in fight against COPA, although he don't realize it's not worth it.

[dkbit98]

Not closed yet, when faketoshi could appeal and COPA could ask for injustice relief. And i agree we should forget him, at least until he wrongfully attempt to sue someone else again.

Appeal for what?
He doesn't have any proof for his stupid claims, so he can do whatever he wants.
COPA presented actual evidence in court and that is why they won the case, unlike Faketoshi who only had hear-say to present.
Even people who followed him for years and abandoning him now.

[ABCbits]

2 small updates.

• Faketoshi need to pay 6 million British pound to cover COPA's court cost.
• UK court freeze faketoshi asset to make sure he'll make the payment.

Let's hope it'll make faketoshi reconsider before making false claim or falsely suing someone again.

Source,
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/COPA-v-Wright-WFO-Approved-Judgment-28.03.2024.pdf page 5
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/craig-wright-assets-frozen-uk-113522311.html