Update:I realize that i made 2 errors in judgment:1- demirtasilker57 is working for what he sees as the interest of his bounty, going in force to force him to accept our user was unfriendly from my part, and clearly an error in judgment.
2- in-order to block demirtasilker57 from editing the bounty and thus confusing the users that already joined, i had to use a rank that prevents users from changing posts "brutus" which display a traitor tag. This was another error in judgment and a result of lazyness, as i could have created another rank for this task, but was too busy to do that! This is a big error in judgment, and i regret it.
for this, i would like to apologize to demirtasilker57 publicly, i already did privately.
and as a compensation for this unfortunate incident, i will grant him agency rank, a rank reserved to bounty management agencies
old answer:
I get negative karma because i didnt add signature campaign to my bounty. But it is my bounty manager decision and participants must respect him. If members continue to give negative karma about this kind of problems and do not remove my negative karma. I will delete topic and do not approve altcointalk participants to my bounty campaign.
Bounty campaign link: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=53479.msg292480#msg292480
2 important points
1- only bounty managers should post bounties, because they should be accountable
2- if they offer signature campaign for bitcointalk , but don't offer it for altcoinstalk then we don't want their bounty here.
Altcoinstalks is offering much more exposure to bounties than bitcointalk compared to the effort put to promote the bounty.
ranks on bitcointalk do not mean a thing anymore, users do not need to post to increase their ranks, thus no new posts, no one sees the signature > signature campaign on bitcointalk are useless now, if bounty managers fail to realize that then they are not thinking logically.