Bitcoin (BTC) versus Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is one of the most antagonistic conflicts that is currently happening in digital currencies. The teams behind each network have massively diverse visions for what the future of the Bitcoin blockchain should be. Although the skirmish originally arose over apprehensions concerning block size, the conflict expanded to include many issues such as censorship, business ethics, decentralization and many facets.
Bitcoin Cash (the sixth largest cryptocurrency by market cap) split from the Bitcoin on Tuesday, August 1, 2017. The fork resulted in two separate networks – BTC & BCH – and also two distinct cryptos by the same name functioning on each blockchain.
The primary motivation that caused the chain split was discrepancies over block size. When BTC became more extensively adopted, scalability problems became a tenacious issue. Cumulating the block size as a latent solution to this became the topic of powerful discussion.
The most eminent members of the community behind the fork were: Roger Ver of Bitcoin.com; Jihan Wu of Bitmain; and Craig Wright (the person claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto).
Currently, there are a series of opinions supporting BTC over BCH. One of the main issues concerning the latter is the security of the system.
Another argument is decentralization which is at the central of BTC versus BCH. The larger blocks used by the BCH system creates the mining practice involve bigger computational resources.
BTC is by far the overriding digital asset in the entire system of cryptocurrencies. At press time, it constitutes more than 52.4% of the total market capitalization of all digital currencies.
Read the details in the article of Coinidol dot com, the world blockchain news outlet:
https://coinidol.com/bitcoin-civil-war/