follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Author Topic: Ethereum Devs Delay ASIC-Resistant PoW Algorithm Decision Until Third-Party Audi  (Read 1296 times)

Offline ZionRTZ

  • Legendary
  • *
  • *
  • Activity: 1628
  • points:
    2965
  • Karma: 112
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 1
  • Last Active: November 22, 2020, 08:45:01 AM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 23
    Badges: (View All)
    10 Posts First Post Sixth year Anniversary


Ethereum (ETH) core developers have delayed the decision to implement Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)-resistant proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm ProgPoW. According to an Ethereum core developer meeting on Feb. 1, the team wants to wait until the algorithm is audited by a third party.

Ethereum core developer Hudson Jameson declared during the call that “there is a group forming or multiple groups forming to perform an independent audit on ProgPoW.” He explained that the audit is an attempt to establish how effective the algorithm would be in leveling the playing field for different kinds of hardware used to mine crypto, including GPUs, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays and ASICs.

Jameson also noted that data derived from such an audit should give devs enough confidence to make a decision. While there isn’t a timeline on when the audit would be concluded, Jameson noted that he expects it to be completed in March or early April.

After another core developer, Martin Holst Swende, declared that they have been trying to decide about ProgPoW implementation for several months and that he wonders how it is going to be resolved, dev Greg Colvin responded in a seemingly frustrated and moderately angry tone:

Quote
“It’s resolved by us making a f*****g decision.”

Also, when asked whether they need more data or if they should make a decision, Colvin answered that they “should just make it.”

Still, the overall consensus has fallen on waiting for the audit to be completed to decide on ProgPoW implementation. In the end, Colvin declared:

Quote
“I would happily decide today, but I’m not the expert. I’m happy to wait for the audit, but I’m not happy to make this decision in May or something. An awful lot of people would like to know so they can get on with their business. [...] ‘Am I going to spend $1,000 to buy a rack of CPUs or not?'”

The group also talked about collecting feedback concerning ProgPoW implementation from the community, with a particular focus on miner signaling. The signaling consists of miners embedding data on the chain, which signals their opinion.

As Cointelegraph reported at the beginning of last month, ETH developers at first had reached a tentative consensus to implement the ProgPow algorithm, which would decrease the divide in efficiency between ASIC and GPU mining on the network.

A few days later, an Ethereum code contributor suggested that Ethereum developers should actually embrace ASICS in a reply on developer forum Ethereum Magicians.



SOURCE: https://cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-devs-delay-asic-resistant-pow-algorithm-decision-until-third-party-audit

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open


 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod