Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Learning & News => For Beginners => Basic questions about this forum => Topic started by: Agbe on March 16, 2024, 08:24:14 PM
-
If Karma is not included in the process of ranking up and an account then what is the need of a campaign manager using karma to select participants in a campaign? This how to rank up https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=183665.0 From what I have read and seen in the forum, I have not read a place where karma is part and parcel of the campaign criteria. This is an another link that talks about ranking up https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=23431.0. This is another one again for special Ranks yet no karma is mentioned https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=14162.0. And finally Ranking Up Fast https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=23431.0.
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
Thanks for your friendly responses.
-
I change the ranking as i see fit ... I do not want anyone to know the process, to avoid abuse.
For campaigns, some require good karma, others don't.
-
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
I think the conditions for participating in Signature campaigns depend on the requirements of the bounty managers, and it is subjective. Usually these requirements only relate to the activity of the participants and not to Karma. I rarely see a specific requirement for the number of Karma of the participants, of course members with negative Karma are often not welcome and chosen in signature campaigns.
You can refer to the criteria of bounty manager yahoo62278:
What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319266)
-
The bounty manager makes decisions about which users can participate in signature campaigns. For whatever reason, a bounty manager may decide to make a signature campaign only available to users with the highest karma on the forum (this is an example), because the project team requires it. It is not the administrator or the forum staff who decides who participates and who does not.
So that you understand it better, another example would be to compare karma with what each user is paid per post. Users with a higher rank are better paid than, for example, full member users. Therefore, sometimes a bounty manager may decide to accept users with more karma into their campaigns, as they will have a better reputation for writing more detailed and useful posts for the forum and users.
-
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
Thanks for your friendly responses.
Imo, karma is a very important aspect of your account.
In the end , what really matters is your reputation in this forum. If you have a good reputation, you are more likely to be accepted in good campaigns and/or other promotions.
Karma is a good way to measure your reputation. Not the only one, but it is certainly important
-
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
These things have nothing to do with the administrators and moderators of the forum, the decision is up to the campaign managers. In some cases, you can have a large number of karma, but the manager will still not choose you, because he thinks that your posts are not good enough and do not attract attention.
So the answer is still the same for all doubts about acceptance into campaign signatures, write constructively and don't spam. A very easy rule.
MrSpasybo pointed to the yahoo62278's thread, if you interpret it well, you should find answers to your doubts.
You can refer to the criteria of bounty manager yahoo62278:
What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319266)
-
I think this is one of the reasons yahoo dropped that thread of his because many users are drawn to the attention that having lots of karma alone can secure them a signature campaign and with the way the forum is now, I think even a spammer can easily abuse the karma system and getting himself lots of karma, so thats why it's necessary for campaign manager to check and choose from their own criteria that would deem any user of their choice to be qualified for their signature campaign but in all having good post record and your frequent activeness in contributions here should cover you in securing a spot in any signature campaign.
-
Please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigns and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
I am sure that Karma is one of the criteria used by bounty managers to accept most especially with signature campaigns but is not the only one...they will also consider the ranking and the quality of the posts of the candidates. One may have a good number of karma if the quality of the posts suffers a lot then the applicant can be rejected as there are others who are just waiting to be included.
-
If people are receiving lots of karma, then that would imply to me that users are probably reading their posts. People whos posts get read hive a higher likelyhood that people see the signature. It also could show that the community respects that users opinion.
None of this is a guarantee that someone gets into a campaign, it just might increase their chances. As a manager, you still have to look at their posts and judge the quality for yourself.
-
Please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigns and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
I am sure that Karma is one of the criteria used by bounty managers to accept most especially with signature campaigns but is not the only one...they will also consider the ranking and the quality of the posts of the candidates. One may have a good number of karma if the quality of the posts suffers a lot then the applicant can be rejected as there are others who are just waiting to be included.
Maybe, or maybe not. From the campaigns that are currently running in this forum, only @yahoo62278 is the first one to require participants of his campaign to include in their application the current number of karmas they have. Especially since most participants of the campaigns right now are the teleported accounts that were accepted even without receiving any karma yet during the application.
Since there are increasing numbers of new users every single day, I think the bounty managers have their own criteria and they may start to include the number of karmas received to select better participants to promote the project they handle.
But there is something in my mind. If ever this criteria have been added, I think it would give more advantages to those users who purchased a special rank as they have a huge additional number of karmas received.
-
If Karma is not included in the process of ranking up and an account then what is the need of a campaign manager using karma to select participants in a campaign?
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
Karma can be a consideration that Bounty Managers need so that members are accepted in various campaigns, but there are also Bounty Managers who don't care about karma, and what they see is the quality of their posts which can be useful to all members on altcoinstalks.
For campaigns, some require good karma, others don't.
The admin's statement is also exactly the same as my statement because for campaigns there are those that need karma and there are also bounty managers who don't need karma as a reference for being accepted in a campaign.
None of this is a guarantee that someone gets into a campaign, it just might increase their chances. As a manager, you still have to look at their posts and judge the quality for yourself.
Yeps, if I were a Bounty Manager I would definitely see it from the quality of the posts because the quality of the posts has a positive effect on all members on the altcoinstalks forum.
I'll just take an example like this
-A Bitcoin miner will definitely know clearly about the tools needed to miner Bitcoin.
-Indirectly, the member will definitely explain in detail the procedures for Bitcoin mining with his expertise.
-The explanation may be at the beginning of the tools needed for Bitcoin mining, such as computer specifications, internet power, hardware and software needed for Bitcoin mining.
Then, what is the feedback from members who provide detailed information about Bitcoin mining?
-Yeps, the answer is in the karma gifts from members who feel helped by the topic created by the member which explains in detail about Bitcoin mining.
-For campaigns, this position will definitely be seen by the Bounty Manager because posts from members about Mining Bitcoin are very useful and needed by other members to be able to mine Bitcoin and this is a good opportunity to be accepted in various campaigns.
*The key answer to this topic is that if I become a Bounty Manager, I will accept the member in the campaign by assessing the quality of the posts he has made and informed all members.
-
If I'm not wrong then till now there's no such Karma requirements for the signature campaigns but if we see the importance of Karma then to some extent it plays some role in selecting of participants by a campaign manager. Like yahoo62278 said, the ones who have good karma can be considered as more readable members, the ones whose posts are read by the majority, and on that basis such members may get some priority during selection.
I believe the most important thing that a campaign manager looks for a participant is that how good he/she is in representing his/her views and how active he/she is during the week. An active participant with good posts may get some priority by campaign managers even if they don't receive so many positive karma, however karma is an important aspect to determine good posters so it won't be totally ignored by the campaign managers.
-
If Karma is not included in the process of ranking up and an account then what is the need of a campaign manager using karma to select participants in a campaign?
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaign and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
Karma can be a consideration that Bounty Managers need so that members are accepted in various campaigns, but there are also Bounty Managers who don't care about karma, and what they see is the quality of their posts which can be useful to all members on altcoinstalks.
-snip-
There are many managers teleporting to Altcointalks who previously used merit as the minimum standard to join their campaigns, but now that no longer applies equally.
Karma is not like Merit because it has a different system of course.
And the absolute and so fixed rule is about the quality of the posts of each member who wants to join.
In the Bitcointalk Forum all post quality checks can use third-party websites that have been integrated and easy to check the quality of participants' posts.
But at Altcointalks I also don't know how to check the performance of each participant, whether this is done manually or there are other websites to do it.
That is the campaign manager's job and every manager has their own rules.
-
But at Altcointalks I also don't know how to check the performance of each participant, whether this is done manually or there are other websites to do it.
Well, to check members on altcoinstalks, as you know so far, you can see it in the "Statistics" section of the profile, see the statistics section of my account: damsix (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=statistics;u=35709)
I also only recently found out that the bounty manager from "icopres" used this feature to accept participants on altcoinstalks who joined the campaign handled by BM icopress.
For now, I personally am quite satisfied with seeing the performance of altcoinstalks members by looking at the "statistics" feature and it is very simple to check.
That is the campaign manager's job and every manager has their own rules.
This is of course completely up to the choices chosen by the Bounty Manager, of course all bounty managers have different rules for accepting each participant.
We cannot intervene with bounty managers regarding this matter, whether it is about choices or policies issued to accept bounty participants.
Except maybe right in the middle of the campaign there were members who experienced incidents of violating forum rules and this is a different story.
-
Admin should not be responsible for any criteria used for participation in signature campaigns, and he should not explain anything.
Ranking can be confused in all forums and it doesn't mean that someone will be paid better just because he has a higher rank.
Better ask managers to explain what they want.
-
Admin should not be responsible for any criteria used for participation in signature campaigns, and he should not explain anything.
Ranking can be confused in all forums and it doesn't mean that someone will be paid better just because he has a higher rank.
Better ask managers to explain what they want.
You are right, admin should never be responsible for signature campaign participation because it's the job of a campaign manager not of an admin. Most often campaign managers prefer to accept those members in their campaigns who are active and who contribute helpful information to the forums.
The reason for accepting such participants is simple, the advertisers want best exposure and such participants can give them that exposure. Let's compare two participants, one who makes many posts a day but all of his/her posts are just meaningless and they don't contain valuable information which can attract the readers.
On the other hand there is another participants who makes 4-8 valuable posts that contain genuine, relevant information which could help the readers or you can say other members of the forum. The later one will be the preferred choice for the campaign manager because he/she will help the brand to get more exposure than the one who makes many useless posts.
-
with what i see in this, i don't think we are to hold any campaign manager responsible on how they which to state the requirement for the criterial needed in selecting participants for their signature campaign, however, i still don't think there's much need in using the criteria of karma in selecting for campaign participation, though it may to an extent depict the layer of how effect you have been posting quality as people continue to give more karma to you, but its still not an accurate means because you can make quality posts from here to the moon and none may give you one, so since its not a requirement to ranking up, i don't think there's a need as well in requesting for such, but the managers in charge has their own right as well in making decision on what they needed as requirement.
-
Well, to check members on altcoinstalks, as you know so far, you can see it in the "Statistics" section of the profile, see the statistics section of my account: damsix (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile;area=statistics;u=35709)
I also only recently found out that the bounty manager from "icopres" used this feature to accept participants on altcoinstalks who joined the campaign handled by BM icopress.
For now, I personally am quite satisfied with seeing the performance of altcoinstalks members by looking at the "statistics" feature and it is very simple to check.
Thanks for the information, I also just found out about this statistic and of course this will make it easier for anyone to see the performance of participants especially for managers.
Admin should not be responsible for any criteria used for participation in signature campaigns, and he should not explain anything.
Ranking can be confused in all forums and it doesn't mean that someone will be paid better just because he has a higher rank.
Better ask managers to explain what they want.
Ranking is only a grouping, not an absolute for quality.
Many high-ranking accounts don't even have the quality they rank.
Managers have their own assessment for each participant who applies and who will be more deserving of acceptance.
-
I know that the initiator of the topic is teleported from BTT, so I'm a little surprised that a Hero member has a question like this and that he addresses the same to the forum staff if he knows (maybe he doesn't) that even in the forum from which he came, the staff has no influence on who will be accepted to signature campaign, and who doesn't.
Whether it's karma or merits, it shouldn't be something by which someone's quality is measured, because if you were to look at that criterion, then I'm one of the less quality members on this forum considering the number of karma I received for my posts compared to the merits I get on BTT for posts of the same quality.
-
-snip-
Whether it's karma or merits, it shouldn't be something by which someone's quality is measured, because if you were to look at that criterion, then I'm one of the less quality members on this forum considering the number of karma I received for my posts compared to the merits I get on BTT for posts of the same quality.
Yes it shouldn't be like that, Karma and merit are just a number given by others for good post appreciation.
The main criteria should be how someone creates a topic or how they describe each issue well and be themselves without forcing them to know everything.
In BTT maybe we have a fairly wide range of rewards, but here we are both new, but yes this is not only because of the amount of karma and merit
-
I change the ranking as i see fit ... I do not want anyone to know the process, to avoid abuse.
For campaigns, some require good karma, others don't.
Nice reply, I liked it. Well, I was also concerned a while ago about what would be the criteria for a manager to select a participant in a campaign, and I do have some know-how but I know I might be wrong too. As different managers have different criteria. And recently, yahoo62278 made a topic and revealed his way of selecting members. What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319266.msg1519117#msg1519117) His way is quite impressive BTW.
Speaking of other managers, they haven't shared any criteria but I assume they must have one. With time we will get to know other's criteria as well. But till then I would say dear OP keep growing and contributing get some badges if possible. But not the bad ones 😂
-
I change the ranking as i see fit ... I do not want anyone to know the process, to avoid abuse.
For campaigns, some require good karma, others don't.
Nice reply, I liked it. Well, I was also concerned a while ago about what would be the criteria for a manager to select a participant in a campaign, and I do have some know-how but I know I might be wrong too. As different managers have different criteria. And recently, yahoo62278 made a topic and revealed his way of selecting members. What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=319266.msg1519117#msg1519117) His way is quite impressive BTW.
Speaking of other managers, they haven't shared any criteria but I assume they must have one. With time we will get to know other's criteria as well. But till then I would say dear OP keep growing and contributing get some badges if possible. But not the bad ones 😂
Most managers likely will not share selection criteria. Some of them may not even have any criteria, they just pick whomever applies on a 1st come 1st serve basis.
In reality, a poster doesn't need to know a managers criteria, they just need to make sure they are doing the best that they can. If you are not being accepted into campaigns, you might consider sending a message to managers asking what you can improve on.
-
In reality, a poster doesn't need to know a manager's criteria; they just need to make sure they are doing the best they can. If you are not being accepted into campaigns, you might consider sending a message to managers asking what you can improve on.
Spot on!
I guess you will agree with me that at least 50% of currently active users were teleported from the Bitcointalk, and it is too early for managers to pick participants based on their karma because most of the members who came to this forum did not earned enough karma while old users of this forum already has a lot of karma.
Moreover, it is too easy to abuse karma these days with alt firms or by creating a friend circle since the karma is unlimited and nobody can check the karma stats except the admin. So, I guess it would be a weak criterion even if managers consider karma to pick participants. Things may change in the future.
-
Most managers likely will not share selection criteria. Some of them may not even have any criteria, they just pick whomever applies on a 1st come 1st serve basis.
In reality, a poster doesn't need to know a managers criteria, they just need to make sure they are doing the best that they can. If you are not being accepted into campaigns, you might consider sending a message to managers asking what you can improve on.
That's true and I think a manager not even sharing their selection method is somehow good because it just keep the curiosity open out there for the applicants especially the one's that always feel they would like to have an edge over others.
For the case of users sending PM to managers asking for insight to the reason on why not being selected and where to to improve is actually a good thought but I think most manager frown at that and I believe if a users does that , it even makes their chances slim for the manager to select them in any of his campaign well not for everyone I guess.
-
I think a campaign manager basically verifies the eligibility of a member to participate in a campaign. It is the responsibility of the forum admin and other stuff to verify that the manager's rules and users' posts are in accordance with the forum's rules. And in the case of signature campaigns, one manager follows each criteria It often depends on the demand of the project. Like gambling casinos has the demand of gambling related post and mixers and other cryptocurrency project need different boards. By combining all these, a member is eligible to participate in a campaign. Another main issue is that one cannot be eligible to participate in the campaign if there is only post activity. To participate in the campaign, one must be a quality poster.
-
Moreover, it is too easy to abuse karma these days with alt firms or by creating a friend circle since the karma is unlimited and nobody can check the karma stats except the admin. So, I guess it would be a weak criterion even if managers consider karma to pick participants. Things may change in the future.
As far as I know, only Senior+ members have unlimited karma points, all ranks below that are limited to what they get from other members - although I don't know how the formula works - 1 karma received = 1 karma that can be given to someone or the formula is different.
Of course, members will always find a way to abuse karma, and it is no secret that merits on BTT are still sold today on the black market and that some members have used airdropped merits to rank their alt accounts.
-
This question should be directed to the campaign managers and not the admin. The forum does not run signature campaigns and as far as i know, they also do not moderate it.
Campaign managers will try to adopt what they think is a good criteria to select participants in their campaigns and it can include a lot of things and it also depends on the type of campaign, is it a casino, mixer, instant exchange, etc. However i don't know if it is important for a manager to make such criteria public, it can affect the posting patterns of members who may try to post to meet those criteria. Lastly, just communicate freely on the forum, if you don't spam, you have a chance to get in a campaign.
-
Of course, members will always find a way to abuse karma, and it is no secret that merits on BTT are still sold today on the black market and that some members have used airdropped merits to rank their alt accounts.
Even if merits are sold on that black market and if old members use their airdropped merits to rank up their alts, you can still investigate it and find it quickly and a single negative tag is enough to ruin the account. But when it comes to altcoinstalks karma system, we cannot check who gave karma to whom. So, people will use their other accounts to send positive karma to other accounts. Or they will manage other Senior member + member to firm karma to rank up. It is possible to stop these abuse only if admin disclose the karma stats of a user.
-
As far as I know, only Senior+ members have unlimited karma points, all ranks below that are limited to what they get from other members - although I don't know how the formula works - 1 karma received = 1 karma that can be given to someone or the formula is different.
Members with ranks below Senior have no option of changing others' karma at all. This option is available for Senior members and above only. So no hidden formula.
-
Even if merits are sold on that black market and if old members use their airdropped merits to rank up their alts, you can still investigate it and find it quickly and a single negative tag is enough to ruin the account.
Merits abuse is something that is not investigated very often, but even when it results in negative feedback, it does not mean that the account is automatically destroyed - it used to be like that, but today you have examples of accounts with negative tags from DT1 members participating in the sig campaign without any problems.
But when it comes to altcoinstalks karma system, we cannot check who gave karma to whom. So, people will use their other accounts to send positive karma to other accounts. Or they will manage other Senior member + member to firm karma to rank up. It is possible to stop these abuse only if admin disclose the karma stats of a user.
There is actually a way to find out who gave you negative karma, and I thought it only required payment, but now I checked and I see that it also requires some luck. That option is called The Eye of Sauron - See who gave you karma (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=316161.0)
-
Most managers likely will not share selection criteria. Some of them may not even have any criteria, they just pick whomever applies on a 1st come 1st serve basis.
I heard some managers have secret black lists and white list of members, I don't know if this is true ;)
It is a bad idea to accept everyone who signs up for campaign, but it's also not easy to find enough quality members willing to apply.
After watching situation with managers in forum last few years, I can say that it's not an easy job at all.
-
Most managers likely will not share selection criteria. Some of them may not even have any criteria, they just pick whomever applies on a 1st come 1st serve basis.
I heard some managers have secret black lists and white list of members, I don't know if this is true ;)
It is a bad idea to accept everyone who signs up for campaign, but it's also not easy to find enough quality members willing to apply.
After watching situation with managers in forum last few years, I can say that it's not an easy job at all.
I published my blacklist on the other forum at 1 point, I stopped adding to it after awhile though(at least publicly). I think if users know that it's real, they might go further in trying not to find themselves on it. They might improve their quality.
-
I heard some managers have secret black lists and white list of members, I don't know if this is true ;)
It is a bad idea to accept everyone who signs up for campaign, but it's also not easy to find enough quality members willing to apply.
After watching situation with managers in forum last few years, I can say that it's not an easy job at all.
I know for sure that some managers have their black and white lists. Some don't even keep them a secret.
A long time ago there was a SMAS list on Bitcointalk ([SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam), and it was very difficult for everyone from that list to get involved in a serious campaign.
-
I heard some managers have secret black lists and white list of members, I don't know if this is true ;)
It is a bad idea to accept everyone who signs up for campaign, but it's also not easy to find enough quality members willing to apply.
After watching situation with managers in forum last few years, I can say that it's not an easy job at all.
I know for sure that some managers have their black and white lists. Some don't even keep them a secret.
A long time ago there was a SMAS list on Bitcointalk ([SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam), and it was very difficult for everyone from that list to get involved in a serious campaign.
I remember this on the other forum. They even create a list of 1000 most spammers and DTs give a neutral tag to those users on the list. Some people I know even said that the campaign managers added some of those users to their ignore list and completely avoided interacting with them.
-
I published my blacklist on the other forum at 1 point, I stopped adding to it after awhile though(at least publicly). I think if users know that it's real, they might go further in trying not to find themselves on it. They might improve their quality.
This could motivate some members to improve post quality, but it's a double edged sword, and it can make some people quit the forum.
Than some managers can add someone to black list for all the wrong reasons, maybe because member has a different opinion.
Some people I know even said that the campaign managers added some of those users to their ignore list and completely avoided interacting with them.
I have a bunch of people ignored because I don't want to waste time reading their posts.
-
Merits abuse is something that is not investigated very often, but even when it results in negative feedback, it does not mean that the account is automatically destroyed - it used to be like that, but today you have examples of accounts with negative tags from DT1 members participating in the sig campaign without any problems.
That's because the user has a long forum background and has a lot of positive feedback. Sometimes, users get negative feedback just because of disagreement, and we have seen that a couple of times. Sometimes, managers do not care about the negative feedback if the user is worthy enough to be accepted in a campaign.
There is actually a way to find out who gave you negative karma, and I thought it only required payment, but now I checked and I see that it also requires some luck. That option is called The Eye of Sauron - See who gave you karma (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=316161.0)
Yeah, I know that. But if I am not wrong, you cannot use The Eye of Sauron to check other members' karma stats. You can do it for your own account only. Also, as you mentioned, you need some luck as well.
-
If Karma is not included in the process of ranking up and an account then what is the need of a campaign manager using karma to select participants in a campaign? This how to rank up https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=183665.0 From what I have read and seen in the forum, I have not read a place where karma is part and parcel of the campaign criteria. This is an another link that talks about ranking up https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=23431.0. This is another one again for special Ranks yet no karma is mentioned https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=14162.0. And finally Ranking Up Fast https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=23431.0.
Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread. And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.
Thanks for your friendly responses.
As per the rules of this forum, each of your posts will count as one activity and you will earn a certain rank when you reach certain activities. If you post a specific post, you will earn a specific bank when that post is converted to activity, and when you apply to a campaign, the campaign must mention the minimum rank of members they will hire for the job. You can read their rules carefully and then apply to those campaigns but if your rank is low you can increase your rank by posting and then again be a part of that campaign.
-
You can read their rules carefully and then apply to those campaigns but if your rank is low you can increase your rank by posting and then again be a part of that campaign.
Everyone is allowed to apply for the campaigns that are open and the ones who contribute good stuff may get accepted in a campaign.
The campaign managers know which members are active, they also look for the posts which contain good and valuable information.
There is of course that rank requirement and if we keep that in our mind then higher rank members will get somewhat high pay rates in some signature campaigns.
It's always better to make posts without caring about the rank because if someone posts only to rank up then such type of posting may let a member to do spamming.
-
Everyone is allowed to apply for the campaigns that are open and the ones who contribute good stuff may get accepted in a campaign.
The campaign managers know which members are active, they also look for the posts which contain good and valuable information.
There is of course that rank requirement and if we keep that in our mind then higher rank members will get somewhat high pay rates in some signature campaigns.
It's always better to make posts without caring about the rank because if someone posts only to rank up then such type of posting may let a member to do spamming.
I think all bounties campaign manager has their own criteria when accepting new member in their signature campaign, most of them looking for active user but keep prefer the member have good qualities post. Actually most of signature campaign in this forum have the same rate payment indeed your reach highest level behind not adopted with payment system such as in bitcointalk forum.
take care post firstly and make bounty campaign manager interested how the member contribution in the forum by giving more educative post here.