В Китае создали «горячую линию» для доносов на майнеров криптовалют
Теперь любой желающий может донести на своего соседа, занимающегося майнингом, даже если активисту это просто кажется
По данным The Financial Times, Комиссия по развитию и реформам Внутренней Монголии (IMDRC) планирует создать горячую линию для сообщений о майнерах криптовалюты.

Источник
https://www.ixbt.com/news/2021/05/24/v-kitae-sozdali-gorjachuju-liniju-dlja-donosov-na-majnerov-kriptovaljut.html

##№@@ ...--- Grin Уроды

Какой класс активов будет иметь самую высокую доходность в 2021-2030 годах? Общий доход с настоящего момента до конца 2030 года.

Bitcoin has the capabilities of positively affecting the world's economy in general. Bitcoin offers good incredible benefits to our finances by harnessing payment methods through the provision of good security, fast transaction, low cost per transactions, owner control of transactions etc.
Bitcoin also offer job opportunities and financial satisfaction to the people and as such boost the economy of the world.

to get dumped and forgotten. Not all of course.


And I cannot wait for Mcafee to eat his own dick on live television. 2020 will be the best year. 

Can Ripple’s XRP Hit the $10 Mark by the End of 2018? – XRP Price Today – Sun Oct 14

Ripple (XRP) is one of the biggest digital currencies in the market so far. With a market cap of $10.38 billion, XRP enthusiasts and investors are trying to contemplate whether the coin will hit the $10 mark within the next three months. XRP’s Looming Partnership with J.P Morgan This...

Read more: https://www.trackcoinmarket.com/en/blog/can-ripple's-xrp-hit-the-dollar10-mark-by-the-end-of-2018-xrp-price-today-sun-oct-14

Having taken some time to look at a number of ICO's in depth, it looks to me that a large number of them may be marketers first and developers second. They all seem to be great at selling a vision or product but when you actually start to scratch beneath the surface, you start to notice that they promise the impossible, if it sounds too good to be true then it probably is. That's not to say that all ICOs are like that, there's a number of very well thought out and genuine ones.

So my question is, what do you want from an ICO with regards to its presentation and what they offer? Is having a working demo or MVP the most important? Is it all about the team or does that not matter if they've already demonstrated their competence? Do you want the ICO team to generate hype and "oversell" or would you rather a more honest and direct approach?

I think our main problem is the huge electricity expense induced by mining and its noxious effect on the climate. This is, to my mind, the only serious argument against Bitcoin.
Alleviating the electricity expense should be one of our priorities. If we do not do it for the sake of the Earth (which we really should) we should at least do it selfishly because governments will not tolerate this forever and they will be right. The more the exchange rate increases, the worse it gets, of course.
Some solutions exist though: first there is proof-of-stake, of course. This technology may be too young to be deemed reliable enough but we should at least start considering it.
If we do not like proof-of-stake I think we could drammatically decrease the electricity expense by stopping monetary creation now. Nowdays Bitcoin is famous enough to remain secure even if miners earned transaction fees only. And if as a whole there are 16.5 M coins instead of 21 M, this does not make much of a difference. That is even good for holders. To make miners agree with that solution, they must be compensated for their lost income.  More precisely, active miners must be compensated because they have already bought ASICs. Futures miners do not need to be compensated. Since mining is a competitive industry, future miners will make no profit on average, whatever the reward scheme. To compensate active miners we could decide that the next 2016 blocks yield, say, 100 new coins and then 0 forever. Everybody would win and the Earth above all!
There are probably many other solutions and I wish the community cared a little more about this fundamental issue.

No, I do not believe that. We must admit that what has allowed banks to acquire so much economic power is their ability to understand where capital is, and make the necessary efforts to keep it.

Knowing that banks will never fight against capital, what I see today is a growing interest of banks to incorporate blockchain technologies into their processes, and because of their marked interest in taking over everyone's money, it would not be strange that in the near future we will see banks willing to accept cryptocurrencies to carry out financial transactions.