Visa, công ty hàng đầu thế giới về công nghệ thanh toán, gần đây đã chú ý đến sự nổi bật ngày càng tăng của Solana trên thị trường stablecoin.

Theo Visa Stablecoin Dashboard, Solana gia tăng đột biến các giao dịch stablecoin, đặc biệt là USDC, một loại stablecoin được gắn với đô la Mỹ.

Nếu Visa tiếp cận và tận dụng được sức mạnh của mạng lưới Solana thì họ sẽ có thể tiếp cận và phục vụ hàng triệu người dùng trong thị trường crypto, điều mà họ đã bỏ lỡ cơ hội vài năm trước. Điều duy nhất còn lấn cấn là Solana chưa thực sự ổn định như sự kỳ vọng của người dùng và nhà đầu tư, em không rõ Visa có để ý vấn đề này không, hoặc họ có giải pháp thay thế nào ổn định để dự phòng hay không.

Solana có quá nhiều cơ hội nhờ sức mạnh và phí rẻ, nhưng tự khiến bản thân rơi vào thế khó bởi vẫn chưa thể đảm bảo được sự ổn định, tránh được những sự cố ngưng hoạt động trong nhiều năm qua. Đội ngũ Solana sẽ còn rất nhiều việc cần làm để có thể hoàn thiện và đảm bảo Solana là lựa chọn đáng giá cho các đối tác.

Quote from: luckyledger on April 23, 2024, 09:20:46 PM

Im with you. Such people are often sensitive and unsolicited criticism is rarely constructive and brings no results. People without addictions must learn to cultivate empathy and treat addicts with understanding. And probably this is also easier said than done because usually the first reaction to the action of a person's addiction is negative. But still since those facing addiction may not fully grasp their situation, expecting them to respond positively to criticism is unrealistic.

I wouldn't completely agree with you that the reactions to the actions of an addicted fellow is ALWAYS negative. If you say it's mostly negative then I'll agree but not always.
Let's assume you were once addicted to gambling and then you finally got help and quit the addiction, are you saying that you'll get a negative reflex or reaction when you confront someone who is still fighting addiction.

In such a case, I bet the first thing you'd do is put yourself in his shoes because you'd understand what it means and how it feels to be addicted and how helpless the person is.

Its true, my perspective might have come off as a bit too general. Reactions can indeed vary widely. But what I was trying to say is that most of the time, people's first reaction is negative, and that's because not many folks have been through this themselves or seen someone close go through it. They can really relate and understand. But the truth is, most people haven't had that kind of close up experience with addiction. So my point is as a society we really need to learn how to be more understanding and supportive. We're not really taught how to handle these situations, how to treat people who are struggling, which is something we need to work on. We need to bring a bit more empathy.

jika berinvest dikoin top sih gak usah diragukan aku pun demikian tidak harus perpikir pajang dalam mengeluarkan uang jika benar uang yang kita miliki free  dan layak untuk menginvestasikan di dalam crypto

Meskipun top Coin, terutama yang memiliki tingkat volatilitas yang tinggi tetap perlu analisa juga ketika memutuskan untuk masuk. Semisal membeli ketika harga sedang berada dalam kondisi bearish dan menjual ketika sedang bullish. Minimalnya bisa membaca chart untuk menganalisa secara teknikal; Sementara secara fundamental, menganalisa juga kondisi-kondisi yang sekiranya bisa mempengaruhi kondisi pasar dari koin tersebut.

I keep seeing this type of comparison all the time and everywhere. I think its quite obvious that they are not the same but for some reason it must be "feeling" same to some people. If you are not using TA or FA, if you are not reading the charts, if you are not putting your entire trading knowledge into each trade, then yeah you may feel that way. Still doesn't mean its gambling, but a newbie just randomly picking something may feel a little bit like a gambler. I believe that as long as we get to just have a positive return or at least potential to it, the lack of house edge alone makes it quite possible for you to be fine.

Its true, any activity where a newbie jumps in and just hopes for the best can feel a lot like gambling. Its about luck for them at that point kind of like playing the lottery. If you're not looking at charts or putting your knowledge to work I can totally see why it might feel more like a gamble. But processes that you can control or predict more than 80% can hardly be considered random

For the benefit of clarity on MixTum:

In a case where an investor loses his digitally signed letter of guarantee which happens to be the only means of trace knowing fully well that the organisation stores no data nor log of transactions; is there a provisions for a re-issuing of another digitally signed letter of guarantee?