If there is a big risk to even talk about mixers themselves, then we have a word for that in the English dictionary: censorship. Even Bitcointalk did not go so far as to ban public speech about mixers outright,

Since I have not seen any country try to sanction people for talking about mixers (not even authoritarian states like Russia), I am led to the conclusion that such censorship is non-existent.

For now at least.

maybe we can add to group, so every post will moderate but the problem is they will make another account

Everyone has their own way of managing their portfolio with a little tweaking and input from others and learning from experience.
I also thank you for reminding me and giving me new knowledge.

Even though we have to have our own analysis, at least as a literacy we read the news and get input from other people, even if it's just input because the decision is still our own analysis and decisions. because after all, it's our money and it's our risk

I have created topics on this forum and also the btt forum, usually for discussions that I feel less confident will bring interesting discussions, it crossed my mind to embed that word. Yes, maybe in a slightly different way with the aim of allowing other people to reply to each other on the topic created to produce lots of answers from various views. Until now, I have never felt that this closing word is widely used in this forum (or maybe there are certain subforums where many users use this word but I don't read it).

And I feel disturbed by embedding these words in the topic being created. I consider it a good effort to get useful replies even if the points raised by the person providing the answer are only a few.

Maybe in the future posts in the bounty section should be exempted from activity and forum ranking. Such posts have a really small contribution to the forum, for example, a user who reaches legendary rank, where 99% of posts are bounty reports. It should not be the same as sr. member who wrote quality posts.