This is how Winz.io signature look on Mobile - Can't it be made to look better?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The above is how winz.io signature ad look on my mobile phone, and actually, the way the signature appeared on my phone is not what caught my attention to create this thread, the reason I decided to create this thread is because i actually struggled to find out the company the signature ad belonged to, I only got to know it belonged to winz.io when I saw in the third row, the "winzup loyalty club up to 35%" text, and even this looks very small and one has to zoom out to see it well.

And question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?
- Can't those be converted to bold texts, to make the signature look cleaner, clearer and better? like that of Tumbler, Unijoin, coinomize and so on...

Just me thinking out loud, but your opinions are welcome regardless.

[Zed0X]

And question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?

First is "Winz.io"
Third is Winz
Fourth is "Wheel Winz"

That looks so bad but viewing using desktop, the signature looks fine on Chrome, Brave, and Edge. On Firefox, the Winz.io on the first column is messed up. The rest is good.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

And question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?

First is "Winz.io"
Third is Winz
Fourth is "Wheel Winz"

That looks so bad but viewing using desktop, the signature looks fine on Chrome, Brave, and Edge. On Firefox, the Winz.io on the first column is messed up. The rest is good.

OK, thanks very much for pointing this out, I haven't actually checked this out on my pc, and sincerely, I hardly access the forum on pc, the only time I turn to my pc is when I have an an important post to make which requires alot of image link copying and pasting and editing and so on.

This is not a general opinion though, but personally, I think people are more inclined to using their mobile phones on forums like this, so when designing signatures, how the signature appear on mobile should be top priority, and it's also a win win because, if a signature appear good on mobile, the chances it will also appear good on pc browsers is high - this i honestly do not know, but I suppose it's the case.

[SamReomo]

I'm a desktop user and I can confirm that when the zoom of the page is around 150% or less then the signature appears very well but as soon as we zoom the page more than 150% then signature starts breaking. I have got just 100% similar signature when I zoomed the page to 300%.

[Crypto Library]

I faced this particular problem when I was running bons.io's signature campaign. Then I applied the signature of the bitcointalk forum directly to this forum and saw that the condition of the signature was very bad. Then I made a slight change, but what I understood is that it is better not to use ASCII art characters in the signature design of the altcoinstalks forum. If ASCII art characters are used, I have seen that the interface of the mobile phone is broken. However, Winz.io signature is perfect on both my PC and laptop screen.

[Husires]

I can confirm that it is difficult to read the signature on Tor.
A simple signature is usually easier to read.

[notblox1]

This is a problem that happened before on other signatures and I suggest they manager should contact admin to modify update and fix it.
Issue in only seen on firefox and tor browsers, but it does look nasty and takes a lot of space when browsing forum.

[hugeblack]

This is what my signature looks like:


If you notice, the parts that I put a red line on look good compared to the rest of the parts that are built using ██████▀▄█░░█, but the only difference is the use of this

Code: [Select]

[tt]
tt was giving good results on the BTT forum, but I think it is better to remove it with some changes to the signature code and the result will be better.
In addition to that, taking into account that the size of the width is limited compared to the height, it is therefore necessary to delete some parts that are created by blocks.

[bitterguy28]

I'm a desktop user and I can confirm that when the zoom of the page is around 150% or less then the signature appears very well but as soon as we zoom the page more than 150% then signature starts breaking. I have got just 100% similar signature when I zoomed the page to 300%.

this is what I also observe using Desktop , but even when I check the signature in Mobile it looks fine on my end though maybe there is a need for modification to make it looks better to all of us than just in desktop that we knew how more of the forum users is in mobile than desktops.

[SamReomo]

this is what I also observe using Desktop , but even when I check the signature in Mobile it looks fine on my end though maybe there is a need for modification to make it looks better to all of us than just in desktop that we knew how more of the forum users is in mobile than desktops.

Which mobile phone you used to view it? For most of us it's not working properly, I even tried changing settings of my browsers only for sake of testing but nothing worked on my end.

It was still looking the way OP mentioned in his thread. I tested this on my Realme GT master Edition which's the smartphone that I use on daily basis and it was giving the same issue.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This is what my signature looks like:


If you notice, the parts that I put a red line on look good compared to the rest of the parts that are built using ██████▀▄█░░█, but the only difference is the use of this

Code: [Select]

[tt]

The one you shared above looks absolutely perfect, or so I think, but you didn't tell us if you are viewing from a pc or mobile, but all the same, it's still easy to tell that you are possibly viewing from pc.

tt was giving good results on the BTT forum, but I think it is better to remove it with some changes to the signature code and the result will be better.
In addition to that, taking into account that the size of the width is limited compared to the height, it is therefore necessary to delete some parts that are created by blocks.

Well, I honestly know absolutely nothing when it comes how signatures are designed, and neither do I know anything about BBCODE, but all the same, I think the mistake the designers are making is designing signatures for btt and altt exactly the same way with the same elements, attributes and so on, possibly because they assume both to be crypto forums, which is correct, but they forget that both forums don't have the same settings, or programmed to function or display things the same way.

Signatures designers should find out what style appear really good on this forum for both mobile and pc users, and stop using btt style of design on this forum expecting it to appear same.
Just my thought.

[joniboini]

I think the mistake the designers are making is designing signatures for btt and altt exactly the same way with the same elements, attributes and so on, possibly because they assume both to be crypto forums, which is correct, but they forget that both forums don't have the same settings, or programmed to function or display things the same way.

As far as I can remember, signature son Bitcointalk was also like that for a while, until community members made suggestions to the bbcode and so on. CMIIW.

Not surprising that signature designers don't bother designing for each website since most use the same software (SMF). It is efficient and unless the employer asks them to modify it, they will not find it an issue. At the end of the day, this is related to their contract, so if you have any criticism you can forward it to the team or the designer directly. On the other hand, bbcode on mobile is always a pain in the ass due to the scaling issue afaik. Personally, I'd look at the avatar and see which service they advertise, and if interested I'll visit it if I'm on mobile.

[Lucius]

Some signatures really don't look good in some browsers, especially Tor which shows some of the signatures in a very strange way. We already had at least 2 threads on this, and those who missed them might find some of the answers there.

Signature is too Downwards
Signature Deformed [firefox - Onion browser] [Not bug]

[notblox1]

Again issues with signatures 
I think it is better for campaign managers to first send signature codes to admin for checking and possible corrections.
Last few times he made some changes in signatures and they worked correctly after that.
I just hope he has time for such things 

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Well, I am more attached to my phone than a computer, and so, I can say that the Winz signature looks as bad as in the picture that was provided by OP. I am using a Chrome browser, although I didnot check if the view was going to be different on other browsers. Like @Lucius has already mentioned, some signatures don't look good on some browsers. 

TBH, this Winz signature is the one that looks so bad on mobile view (chrome browser), compared to other SATs paying signatures on this forum.