My Wife and I are creating a Network to Compete with Libra/Diem and we are having issues with Facebook.
Originally posted
March 17, 2021, 03:56:29 AM a few days FORBES wrote an article about the Winklvosses Crypto efforts.
"Facebook is now allowing my Wife to comment on her own Instagram Pictures, but has yet to restore her Facebook Page
https://www.instagram.com/p/CMeXCjpA0vq/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
And attacking my Wife, a Black Woman, while launching a African currency (if they didn't give up), because, what? He's a nerd who invented a place to make his first friend? And bought a Virtual Reality Company?
Zuckerberg was only able to make Facebook because he is Anti-Social, that is what I meant when comparing him to Dan. And if not Anti-Social, just a Bro running a Virtual Reality company he bought on the website he buys his friends on. Because he had a bad time at Highschool and he might have even stolen the whole thing from the Vinklewosses, who have Gemini which he is probably watching and wishing he could be.
So instead he is literally attacking my Wife's company, and trying to prop up his failing idea with it, after renaming his failing brand "Diem"."Jurisdiction for Lawsuits
28 U.S. Code § 1331 - Federal question
28 U.S. Code § 1337 - Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs
28 U.S. Code § 1338 - Patents, plant variety protection, copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition
28 U.S. Code § 1343 - Civil rights and elective franchise
28 U.S. Code§ 1357.Injuries under Federal laws
28 U.S. Code§ 1366.Construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
United States v. Cantrell, 307 F. Supp. 259 (E.D. La. 1969)
Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967)
White v. White, 150 S.E. 531 (W. Va. 1929)
Pruneyard Shopping Ctr. v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980)
They can't claim A.I., we also contacted BBB about it
Domen v. Vimeo, Inc., No. 20-616 (2d Cir. 2021)
They did benefit from my Wife's likeness
Cross v. Facebook, Inc.
https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2017/a148623.htmlThe Winklevoss case
Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/massachusetts/madce/1:2007cv10593/108516Looks like the U.S. Government is Recognizing it, this is a new case
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. FACEBOOK INC. 1:2020cv03590 (2020)
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2020cv03590/224921This case is kind similar to Van Kush v. Facebook and Diem
Swift v. Zynga Game Network, Inc. et al 1:2020cv03590 (ND CA)
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/3:2009cv05443/221703Plaintiff alleged that Defendants utilized social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace to lure unsuspecting consumers into signing up for services and goods that they do not want or need.
This is Facebook being sued for letting people use other people in ads, and resolving it by creating new features acknowledging the phenomenon. This also gets to them trying to keep my Wife out of their Analytics system
Fraley, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/5:2011cv01726/239253/368/They used Private messages inviting ambassadors and explaining Color schemes, etc. and Public Ads, to then propel their business interests while attacking ours
Davis v. Facebook, Inc., No. 17-17486 (9th Cir. 2020)
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/17-17486/17-17486-2020-04-09.htmlFacebook has lawsuits about how much they have to do to stop criminal acts, and that implies they should stop their Employees criminal actions against Customers also
Godwin v. Facebook, Inc., 2020 Ohio 4834
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4794053/godwin-v-facebook-inc/?Texas made a Law about it, we are in Texas
Senate Bill 2373
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=86R&Bill=SB2373