And question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?First is "Winz.io"
OK, thanks very much for pointing this out, I haven't actually checked this out on my pc, and sincerely, I hardly access the forum on pc, the only time I turn to my pc is when I have an an important post to make which requires alot of image link copying and pasting and editing and so on.QuoteAnd question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?First is "Winz.io"
Third is Winz
Fourth is "Wheel Winz"
That looks so bad but viewing using desktop, the signature looks fine on Chrome, Brave, and Edge. On Firefox, the Winz.io on the first column is messed up. The rest is good.
[tt]I'm a desktop user and I can confirm that when the zoom of the page is around 150% or less then the signature appears very well but as soon as we zoom the page more than 150% then signature starts breaking. I have got just 100% similar signature when I zoomed the page to 300%.this is what I also observe using Desktop , but even when I check the signature in Mobile it looks fine on my end though maybe there is a need for modification to make it looks better to all of us than just in desktop that we knew how more of the forum users is in mobile than desktops.
this is what I also observe using Desktop , but even when I check the signature in Mobile it looks fine on my end though maybe there is a need for modification to make it looks better to all of us than just in desktop that we knew how more of the forum users is in mobile than desktops.Which mobile phone you used to view it? For most of us it's not working properly, I even tried changing settings of my browsers only for sake of testing but nothing worked on my end.
This is what my signature looks like:
(https://talkimg.com/images/2024/03/16/Jm4m5.png)
If you notice, the parts that I put a red line on look good compared to the rest of the parts that are built using ██████▀▄█░░█, but the only difference is the use of thisCode: [Select][tt]
Well, I honestly know absolutely nothing when it comes how signatures are designed, and neither do I know anything about BBCODE, but all the same, I think the mistake the designers are making is designing signatures for btt and altt exactly the same way with the same elements, attributes and so on, possibly because they assume both to be crypto forums, which is correct, but they forget that both forums don't have the same settings, or programmed to function or display things the same way.
tt was giving good results on the BTT forum, but I think it is better to remove it with some changes to the signature code and the result will be better.
In addition to that, taking into account that the size of the width is limited compared to the height, it is therefore necessary to delete some parts that are created by blocks.
I think the mistake the designers are making is designing signatures for btt and altt exactly the same way with the same elements, attributes and so on, possibly because they assume both to be crypto forums, which is correct, but they forget that both forums don't have the same settings, or programmed to function or display things the same way.As far as I can remember, signature son Bitcointalk was also like that for a while, until community members made suggestions to the bbcode and so on. CMIIW.
Would get rid of the need for designers and added fees if we could just use images that were clickable
(https://talkimg.com/images/2024/03/15/JQaq3.jpeg)
The above is how winz.io signature ad look on my mobile phone, and actually, the way the signature appeared on my phone is not what caught my attention to create this thread, the reason I decided to create this thread is because i actually struggled to find out the company the signature ad belonged to, I only got to know it belonged to winz.io when I saw in the third row, the "winzup loyalty club up to 35%" text, and even this looks very small and one has to zoom out to see it well.
And question is, what are those yellowish looking like dots stuff in the first row, third row and fourth row?
- Can't those be converted to bold texts, to make the signature look cleaner, clearer and better? like that of Tumbler, Unijoin, coinomize and so on...
Just me thinking out loud, but your opinions are welcome regardless.
Would get rid of the need for designers and added fees if we could just use images that were clickable, I'll talk to jayce and direct him to this topic and see if he knows any fixes. I don't think there will be a ton he can do though.Can images work as signature in this forum and how?
I think, no, that's not going to work. The first thing we can see in our forum profile is, that there's no "choose file" the same as how we update our avatar or "upload" button in our profile to put in signature space. Only BBcode or smileys can be input in the blank space.Would get rid of the need for designers and added fees if we could just use images that were clickable, I'll talk to jayce and direct him to this topic and see if he knows any fixes. I don't think there will be a ton he can do though.Can images work as signature in this forum and how?
I saw admin fixing codes for signature before so he is the guy to talk with about this if he is not very busy.
Maybe there are other important things to work on but having bug with signatures looks very bad to everyone.
Can images work as signature in this forum and how?I think, no, that's not going to work. The first thing we can see in our forum profile is, that there's no "choose file" the same as how we update our avatar or "upload" button in our profile to put in signature space. Only BBcode or smileys can be input in the blank space.
I saw admin fixing codes for signature before so he is the guy to talk with about this if he is not very busy.
Maybe there are other important things to work on but having bug with signatures looks very bad to everyone.
I just tried it and yes, you are right! 👏👏Can images work as signature in this forum and how?I think, no, that's not going to work. The first thing we can see in our forum profile is, that there's no "choose file" the same as how we update our avatar or "upload" button in our profile to put in signature space. Only BBcode or smileys can be input in the blank space.
I saw admin fixing codes for signature before so he is the guy to talk with about this if he is not very busy.
Maybe there are other important things to work on but having bug with signatures looks very bad to everyone.
I just checked, [ img ] code is working in the signature, so it can work. There are limits on its size and I'm not sure about if there are limits on the number of pictures in the signature, but you can use at least one. ???
I just checked, [ img ] code is working in the signature, so it can work. There are limits on its size and I'm not sure about if there are limits on the number of pictures in the signature, but you can use at least one. ???If that works then I guess signatures can be fixed on the forum to some large extent. Some of the signatures are almost broken on mobile devices like that of Winz.io, but after adding of images in signature such issues can be solved to some extent.
I just checked, [ img ] code is working in the signature, so it can work. There are limits on its size and I'm not sure about if there are limits on the number of pictures in the signature, but you can use at least one. ???If this works than all signatures can be updated to look much better than in bitcointalk forum.
It seems the mixtum signature is also not aligned. The Premium Bitcoin Mixer is out of alignment.
Did anyone ever made signatures from only images in some of old campaigns?
The signature looks bad and it needs to be discussed but I wonder how it's a forum related problem or topic? A good designer needs here who understand the bbcode of this forum.
Do we have a service discussion section on this forum?
Did anyone ever made signatures from only images in some of old campaigns?You can even have an animated pic in the signatures, although I don't like having a lot of animation in the signatures.
I just tried it and yes, you are right! 👏👏
I think you mean to write Mixero. Am I correct?It seems the mixtum signature is also not aligned. The Premium Bitcoin Mixer is out of alignment.
From my observation, only three signatures are well aligned which are unijoin, mixers and tumbler. For the rest you have to reduce the font size of your browser before they'll be able to align well.
Since we know the problem and it was sent to the designer, it is better to lock this topic.I am learning to use Karma and one sent for this. It's even better to move the topic from the board like I said it's not a forum issue but an issue with the designing.
TBH, this Winz signature is the one that looks so bad on mobile view (chrome browser), compared to other SATs paying signatures on this forum.This is how Winz signature looks on desktop on my end - using firefox.
I think you mean to write Mixero. Am I correct?
Some used one big banner for a signature. As it was said by DabsPoorVersion above, he tried and found that you can use not more that one picture for a signature. But it can help anyway if a designer will keep in mind a possibility of using it in signature overall design.I think they can make one big image and add additional links below with the same way like it is used now.
You can even have an animated pic in the signatures, although I don't like having a lot of animation in the signatures.I didnt know that, but I think we already have some animations in current signatures here, for example Unijoin.
Adding pictures with words in the signature usually gives bad results, so whoever wants to design a signature with an image is better to do it from scratch.
TBH, this Winz signature is the one that looks so bad on mobile view (chrome browser), compared to other SATs paying signatures on this forum.This is how Winz signature looks on desktop on my end - using firefox.
(https://i.ibb.co/k1BZvCB/winsz.png) (https://ibb.co/Hd4Z384)
Coinomize, Mixero, Tumbler are the paid signatures that only looks good. Most of the signatures have irregularity looks, and are more terrible on mobile devices.