The series is now over, which is understandable, there is a reason why Lakers basically barely got into the playoffs
I don't know if that's a good argument to use on Lakers because they were also in the same position last season. They made it to the West Finals despite barely making it to the playoffs. The difference this time is that they faced the Nuggets too early and it's probably a bad match up for LBJ and company. Maybe a better argument is that there is a reason why they never won against the Nuggets in the regular season.
It's a bad argument "IF" the Lakers are down 0-2, but they are down 0-3, and we know the history of playoff teams who are down 0-3, right?
How can you blow up double digit leads in 2 consecutive games? Game 2, they are up by as much as 20 and they blew it off. Game 3 they are up as many as 12 pts in their own home court, and they blew it up as well?
The argument is bad, but that's the reality. The series is pretty much over at this moment. How can they stop their starting 5 when 4 of them scored 20 or more? On the other hand, how can you win in a series when your expected 3rd option in offense scored 0 points? Russell is the Version 2.0 of Klay Thompson. When they needed him the most, they just choked. I'm not saying that the Lakers should've traded Russell during the regular season, but they know that during the playoffs, he's choking and yet they didn't trade him.
For sure, Laker fans are disappointed with what happened to their team. With the Nuggets up 3-0, this is pretty much over. Just look at how the Nuggets defeated the Lakers 11 consecutive times.