What part of this looks real?
To me all this is clearly fake after reading first two lines of his messages.

All parts of this conversation are quite realistic, even if this particular one did not happen. It shows exactly what happens between the scammer and the victim.
A victim who empathically tries to extract at least part of the money, when he does not do so he threatens with a curse. A scammer who has no sympathy for the greedy who believe in easy money.

This is ridiculous, some groups and politicians must really hate someone else having some privacy. I also worry about other criteria of "CVC mixing", especially these points which are very common feature on many cryptocurrency wallet.

Quote from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-10-23/pdf/2023-23449.pdf

(B) Using programmatic or algorithmic code to coordinate, manage, or manipulate the structure of a transaction;

(D) Creating and using single-use wallets, addresses, or accounts, and sending CVC through such wallets, addresses, or accounts through a series of independent transactions;

(E) Exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets;

This is like some kind of bad parody, shouldn't they find someone with an elementary knowledge of blockchain and not allow some plumber to write these terms for them?

When did this amateurism in the US gov begin?

I got this on Telegram, it seems real. Although it is a scam, I had a lot of fun reading this conversation.
By sharing this, I hope that maybe someone will better understand how the scam works, it seems to me a pretty good example.

I seen someone suggest in the chatbox to allow users to choose 2 slots to fill the open spots. If you are having trouble filling 100 spots, you could do that, but what does that say about the traffic or interest? Things to consider moving forward. Maybe do raffles with less spots and try to build the popularity?

And this raffle is just part of the Mixtum mixer promotion.
Looking at it from the point of view of advertisement, there is not too much difference if we are talking about one or two raffles in the same period. This can be just one observation on the whole matter.

Something was certainly happening with cryptomixer.io, because on 28.05 they wrote a statement on the site. I searched a bit, but I didn't find anything from the recent past that was related to them.

Warrant Canary
We confirm that we take full control of our infrastructure. It has never been compromised or suffered a data breach. We have not disclosed any information of our users, and we have not been forced to modify our system to allow access or data leakage to a third party of any kind.

As of May 28, 2024 we state the following:
We have NOT received any National Security letters;
We have NOT received any gag orders;
We have NOT received any warrants from any government organization.
We are 100% committed to our zero-logs policy — we never log the activities of our users to ensure their ultimate privacy and security.

When will I get access to post our client campaigns in the Altcoin page

You're still pretty vague.
Can you provide all the information you have and what exactly you want to publish here?

To reduce spam, it is not enough to just register an account and flood the forum with links. But if you would explain what exactly you plan to do, maybe you will get concrete answers and a solution to the problem.

Anyhow, the big question is who will replace him. Names currently floating around in the news are: Roberto De Zerbi, Thomas Tuchel, Kieran McKenna, Mauricio ­Pochettino and Thomas Frank.

This is the essence of the problem. Maybe ETH doesn't look like the best of the best, but who is the alternative?

All those listed are good managers, they are rightly mentioned as a possible replacement, but I don't see that any of them has enough capacity for what awaits him in MU. All of them are excellent when there are no great expectations from them and when they are not under the scrutiny of the public.

De Zerbi, had a great last season when he succeeded Graham Potter. No one expected much and not much attention was paid to his work. This allowed him to work relaxed and he produced results.

Pochettino, had some success with Tottenham if you call it success even though you didn't win anything. Then when he had to take the final step forward, he completely failed. Of course, even then no one expected Tottenham to do anything more significant and there were no criticisms when they played badly. Everything fell apart when the criticism became stronger.

Thomas Tuchel is very conflicted, a very similar nature to Mourinho. If he didn't succeed in Bayern, which was much better organized, why would he manage to sort out the mess that is in MU? Also failed in PSG, and the CL title with Chelsea at a time when no one expected anything from them. The following season, everything fell apart when more was expected.

McKenna was already at MU, as an assistant to Ole. Many blamed him for Ole's failures. He is promising, I believe he will be a big name one day, but it is too early for him to take over MU now. He needs to make several successful seasons in a row.

Thomas Frank also fell under the pressure of the previous successful season. It's one thing to lead a team that is content if it's not fighting for survival, and it's quite another thing to lead MU where only wins are satisfying.