🌀 UniJoin.io - CoinJoin Mixer | Your Anonymity Is Our Priority!

[BIT-BENDER]

Tried using it just once and i must say, i'm totally satisfied with Unijoin mixer. Very fast speed and secure pay back to my wallet. Support team is superb and friendly, had a problem with the delay of receiving the output that took almost 24hrs but they we're able to resolved it. also It was my first time but I did like a pro because of very sample steps. I followed all steps and did successfully. Thanks

I love the fact you talked about the swiftness of the support team. Many establishment takes this lightly but this is a very serious aspect of their relationship with the customers

Using financial sensitive platforms like Bitcoin mixers requires lots of security consciousness. And I won't personally trust a random person compared to the support team. So if the support team works fine then it's a big plus to the project.

[Wakate]

Tried using it just once and i must say, i'm totally satisfied with Unijoin mixer. Very fast speed and secure pay back to my wallet. Support team is superb and friendly, had a problem with the delay of receiving the output that took almost 24hrs but they we're able to resolved it. also It was my first time but I did like a pro because of very sample steps. I followed all steps and did successfully. Thanks

I can see from your explanation, you have tested using a mixer which is a good approach that would have clarified you on how the entire processes works. It is time you have to start explaining that to those that might want to mix their Bitcoin but do not understand how the process look like especially when they are uncertain whether to try it or just relaxed.

The AML bot are always targeted at some addresses that might have received funds from address that are under the government watch list. This is one of the reasons we might be required to cut the connection with multiple wallet addresses that might have send funds due to business transactions and other reasons.

[DFortune]

UniJoin.io's use of CoinJoin to anonymize transactions is interesting. While the single, combined transaction with multiple inputs and outputs makes tracing difficult, it relies on a large user pool for effectiveness.

The article mentions a "Wallet Distribution" option. It would be helpful to understand how this distribution is determined. Does it affect anonymity or simply the number of outputs users receive? Additionally, the emphasis on users storing the "letter of guarantee" raises a question.  Without server-side data storage, how can UniJoin.io handle potential disputes or ensure user confidence in case of lost letters?

Let's also explore the claim of random fees between 1% and 3% with four decimal places. Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

[Crypto Momentum]

Having gone through the  content, I would gladly appreciate if soothing answers can be proffered to my questions:

I understand that CoinJoin basically comprises a pull in of coins by people with like minds who are in pursuit of same objective.

Where one decides to withdraw his interest and request for a withdrawal of his coins, is this approach ever possible?

Secondly, at what point is the above approach possible?

Thirdly, if the withdrawal approach is possible, are there conditions attached? If 'yes' what are they?

[icopress]

[...] Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

I myself became interested... I think there is a logical mathematical explanation for this.

[examplens]

[...] Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

I myself became interested... I think there is a logical mathematical explanation for this.

The random fee is exclusively used due to bigger anonymization. The same or a similar fee can affect the recognition of the connection between two or more transactions. With a more precise percentage like 4 decimal places, it is more likely that the analysis will recognize it as a network fee than if it is a service fee.
Why exactly 4 and not 3 or 5 is a question for the devs, although I think it's a random choice.

[Wakate]

I love the fact you talked about the swiftness of the support team. Many establishment takes this lightly but this is a very serious aspect of their relationship with the customers

Using financial sensitive platforms like Bitcoin mixers requires lots of security consciousness. And I won't personally trust a random person compared to the support team. So if the support team works fine then it's a big plus to the project.

The relationship between the customers and an established enterprise need to be strong to ensure there is a mutual bond that will keep users to continue using such service to get their problem solved without any negative experience. Since we have so many mixers online that users can set their hands on to mix coins, it is advisable for a good mixer to create a continuous bond with users to keep the inflow much constant.

New users especially the ones that are new to mixing might find the process uneasy making some complicated mistakes that could lead to lose of fund or difficulty in output. This would never be a difficulty task to be resolved by good and reliable mixer which is the reason why one need to use a good mixer for conjoining of coins.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I love the fact you talked about the swiftness of the support team. Many establishment takes this lightly but this is a very serious aspect of their relationship with the customers

Using financial sensitive platforms like Bitcoin mixers requires lots of security consciousness. And I won't personally trust a random person compared to the support team. So if the support team works fine then it's a big plus to the project.

The relationship between the customers and an established enterprise need to be strong to ensure there is a mutual bond that will keep users to continue using such service to get their problem solved without any negative experience. Since we have so many mixers online that users can set their hands on to mix coins, it is advisable for a good mixer to create a continuous bond with users to keep the inflow much constant.

New users especially the ones that are new to mixing might find the process uneasy making some complicated mistakes that could lead to lose of fund or difficulty in output. This would never be a difficulty task to be resolved by good and reliable mixer which is the reason why one need to use a good mixer for conjoining of coins.

If we are to be talking about easy to use mixers, then I can you tell that Unijoin is definitely one of the those, in fact, one of the best in this regard, the step by step procedure to mixing coins ensures a very easy to understand process, guarantees zero mistakes what so ever, except the user wasn't paying enough attention and mistakenly submitted a wrong address in the process, that can I believe can still be fixed if the users notice it on time when mixed coins havent been sent to the wrong address, but let's say this somehow results in the lose of fund, this absolutely Is no fault of the mixer as we all can agree.

So, in all, I agree wit all that you said, the coinjoin service is one that is beginning to look like online gambling casinos with new mixers launching almost every day, But then, the best mixers will always survive no matter how high the competition gets.