Satoshi Correspondence Revealed by Witnesses in Legal Clash Against Craig Wright

[sirty143]

Satoshi Correspondence Revealed by Witnesses in Legal Clash Against Craig Wright

In the unfolding lawsuit between the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and Craig Wright, three key witnesses who had early interactions with Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto... See more for yourself here.

Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

[philipma1957]

Satoshi Correspondence Revealed by Witnesses in Legal Clash Against Craig Wright

In the unfolding lawsuit between the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and Craig Wright, three key witnesses who had early interactions with Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto... See more for yourself here.

Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

Your link is broken so I can not see any correspondence at all. Maybe you could give the link out in a non hidden way .

[yhiaali3]

Your link is broken so I can not see any correspondence at all. Maybe you could give the link out in a non hidden way .

I think this is the correct link:
https://news.bitcoin.com/satoshi-correspondence-revealed-by-witnesses-in-legal-clash-against-craig-wright/

Anyway, an interesting article from which it turns out that the three witnesses are early Bitcoin developers Marty Malmi and Mike Hearn, as well as Adam Back, the creator of Hashcash, the Proof of Work (PoW) algorithm that is an integral part of the Bitcoin mining process.

I don't think there is anything new in the case, the same claims, and no real evidence by Craig Wright. This is clear from the quote:

Malmi critiqued a complex article penned by Wright, describing it as “very lengthy, hard to follow, and hard to understand,” puzzled as to why Wright didn’t opt for a simpler proof by signing a message. The Finnish computer scientist also observed Wright’s many legal challenges and his unexpected mentions in court. Malmi said he was inaccurately referred to as Norwegian by Wright, despite Nakamoto’s clear recognition of his Finnish origins. Malmi refuted several of Wright’s claims directed at him, categorically denying each one.

That's right, why so complicated when you can provide much simpler proof by signing a letter? Something that Craig Wright has failed to do so far.

[sirty143]

Satoshi Correspondence Revealed by Witnesses in Legal Clash Against Craig Wright

In the unfolding lawsuit between the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and Craig Wright, three key witnesses who had early interactions with Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto... See more for yourself here.

Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

Oh yeah! I'm sorry... tnx anyway!

Your link is broken so I can not see any correspondence at all. Maybe you could give the link out in a non hidden way .

[SamReomo]

Craig Wright is just a clown nothing else, he's not Satoshi Nakamoto and that's proven now. Satoshi and Adam back's e-mail conversations proved that they had a conversation in 2008 before submitting of Bitcoin whitepaper.

I guess Adam knows something about Satoshi and he never said that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto or he has some kind of connection with Satoshi Nakamoto. Now, we fully understand that Craig is a liar and all his claims are just lies.

[Lucius]

When a person is convinced that a lie is the truth to such an extent that he cannot get away with it anymore, then he becomes a pathological liar. Faketoshi is just such a person who will do everything to continue to present his lie in order to stay in the spotlight as long as possible.

People who cooperated with Satoshi surely know that he is not that man even without seeing any proof, and when someone presents hundreds of fabricated documents then there should be no doubts for anyone.

Will Gavin Andresen, who once declared that CW is the real Satoshi, be at the trial? Who knows, maybe he changed his mind again, for the right price of course

[ABCbits]

Nothing new or surprise here, it's just further proof CSW isn't Satoshi and CSW lack technical knowledge.

Will Gavin Andresen, who once declared that CW is the real Satoshi, be at the trial? Who knows, maybe he changed his mind again, for the right price of course

If he were bribed by CSW and agree to it, he'd have hard time in court due to 2 of his past blog post.

[Lucius]

Will Gavin Andresen, who once declared that CW is the real Satoshi, be at the trial? Who knows, maybe he changed his mind again, for the right price of course

If he were bribed by CSW and agree to it, he'd have hard time in court due to 2 of his past blog post.

Gavin has always been a man with a price around his neck, whether he was "bought" by a famous three-letter agency or "persuaded" by Faketoshi to say he was Satoshi. When I read about the events from the early days when Satoshi was still active, I was amazed by the fact that Satoshi valued Gavin so much, while Gavin was at times even aggressive in calling out Satoshi for making too many decisions on his own.

Luckily, Satoshi stuck around long enough to steer Bitcoin in the right direction, because who knows what Gavin and some others would have made of it all.

[dkbit98]

This emails are one good thing that came out from this circus show with faketoshi.
Very interesting reading material and we are getting little more bits and pieces about real Satoshi.

New emails Satoshi - Sirius emails 2009-2011 released:
https://mmalmi.github.io/satoshi/

[Tribalchief]

After reading this, it appears that Satoshi isn't a group of hackers, instead, it's a single person. Hearn made a smart move by posing simple questions to Craig based on previous discussions, but the imposter couldn't pass the test. It's a big shame to see Craig Wright claiming to be someone else when he is not.

I see no tangible reason why someone would return after making an exit in the first place. Craig Wright should stop making a fool of himself and instead consider new ideas that can contribute to making the world a better place, just as Satoshi has done.

[Lucius]

~snip~
I see no tangible reason why someone would return after making an exit in the first place. Craig Wright should stop making a fool of himself and instead consider new ideas that can contribute to making the world a better place, just as Satoshi has done.

We should not expect CW to give up just like that, for the reason that he would admit that they are lying all the time - and on the other hand, he has already convinced himself of this lie so much that he thinks it is the truth. So, regardless of all the evidence that he is not telling the truth, he will still look for a way to cause even the smallest possible doubt that he is Satoshi after all.

Fortunately for him, the world is a big place and there are many countries with many courts in front of which he will try to prove his lies - and the only thing that would prevent him from doing that is to end up in prison or to take his own life (allegedly, he has already attempted suicide once).