Bounty hunters vs Investors, which of them causes a decline in token prices?

[Jereh]

I used to align withth8s assertion until recently when I discovered to the contrary that bounty hunters are actually innocent of causing token price decline.
You would agree with me that most bounties do not usually distribute rewards to bounty hunters early .....hunters receive token long after the tokens are listed .
So how will they cause decline when investors receive tokens before hunters?

[Abusadeeq6]

Both affect the market because both parties are willing to sell their assets. But bounty Hunter do more harm than investors. A bounty Hunter can sell his tokens as low as 100% of the ICO Price which make me to think that they aren't making sense at all

[Dprincebh]

No one is to be blame because all are in for profit. The bounty hunters invested there time and investor invested their money. When token is already launched in market they all go out there to get some profit.

[Ahmedalab]

The idea which came into my mind was the fact that, some people dump the tokens resulting in decline in token value. I thought about this and tried to make an analysis on bounty hunters and investors in possession of tokens being responsible for decline in token value. I want to know, bounty hunters and investors, which of these two groups are responsible for decline in token values after tokens have been listed on exchanges and why?

[hsyncl]

I think it's definitely private investors who have caused the biggest decline. These investors are taking very cheaply as soon as they enter the stock market. Loaded amounts cause the price to be affected.

[Garriss789]

if investors buy at IKO, then they must be sure that the price with access to the exchange will be even lower, this is a great opportunity to buy at a lower price, but if the coin falls all the time, it means that there were no fees, this is my opinion.

[PreshB]

I  think  the   decline  in  price  is  been  caused   by  the   two  party ,  the   investors   and   bounty   hunters.

[Tasha8]

I think that bounty hunters and investors do not play a big role in reducing prices in the market.  To a greater extent, the situation in the market ( a downtrend) and the idea of the project, which does not interest the society and a small number of investors, plays on the decline in token prices.

[pedangrusak]

It depends on the team dev's strategy in dividing the tokens on the bounty hunter, if the percentage is shared large then the possibility of a dump after distribution can occur, but if there are other strategies to anticipate this, dump can be minimized. Today's investors also think they will lose quickly in selling bounty hunters and they also contribute to price reductions after market listings

[Cold_Zero]

I think the early investor makes the token esteem diminish when recorded on the trade, they purchase inexpensively and get a considerable measure of rewards, they can hardly wait to take benefit.

while for the bounty hunters just get a little of the aggregate token available for use, so it doesn't generally influence the cost in the market.

[backfirst77]

More investors causing the price fall. Because the composition of the bounty allocation is only slightly than the ICO that is invested bought. But it's always a bounty hunter to blame in the price of decline. Because this is an easy thing to blame the other side.

[I-Bit]

I am sure the decline cannot be caused by both bounty hunters and investors (average investors). They don't have enough power to reduce the prices on long time period. I think the whales and developers or the teams of projects have more chance to decrease the prices yet they have a power to do that.   

[hannyluv]

both are guilty because its all about profit making. bounty hunters are just after on thing,profits. they usually dont have time to nurture a token,once its on exchange, it gotta go. Investors may nurture a while and dump . both are guilty

[Speaker]

Bounty hunters have no control over the coins...although if the token has a low capitalization, it can be pumped in the short term.Everything else depends on large investors and regulators.

[anshor1]

I have been trying to figure out why some tokens set at appreciable price begin to decline in value after some time once listed on exchange. The idea which came into my mind was the fact that, some people dump the tokens resulting in decline in token value. I thought about this and tried to make an analysis on bounty hunters and investors in possession of tokens being responsible for decline in token value. I want to know, bounty hunters and investors, which of these two groups are responsible for decline in token values after tokens have been listed on exchanges and why?

I think the reasin that causes a decline in tokens prices is bad project.  Not bounty hunters.  I have seen since 2017, If the project is not interesting,  It will not success.