We can not answer this question - thus just assume there is no legal entity for now.

A visible team and a legal entity makes it easier to attack the project, especially by governments.

However, once the products are ready and tested,

Each will be eventually launched as a separate and independent legal entity,
in a crypto favorable jurisdiction or at least a neutral one.

We have 2 units of marketing

The unit headed by the community manager and it is effectively the community marketing.

The official marketing unit, headed by the CMO, which cooperates with various marketing 3rd party services.

What are the marketing plans ?

For the community marketing, you can head to the community telegram group and see what they are up to.

For the official marketing unit, we will never disclose specifics nor time of any marketing action we take (this is to avoid the pump and dump behavior).

No name change planned
it is as good as any

This is not a question asked, not even once ...
However, this should be an important question when you do your DYOR about a project or startup ?

Obviously, shitcoins need no funding, they just need to convince people that price will go up, because they will list here or there or someone will tweet or talk about them, or ... You know a zero-sum game, a greater fool theory.
Often you hear shitcoin founders (usually on twitch) pretending they are spending from own pocket for marketing etc ... This makes me want to laugh, no they don't the sell tokens to cover expenses and make money, don't let them convince you otherwise.

We need funding, because we have serious projects with serious requirements.
We will be selling tokens to fund the development of these projects and the marketing of the token and the project.
Thus funding comes from token selling.

Selling procedure:
We will be selling in small amounts, in-order not to kill momentum, thus you have nothing to worry about.

Our team is made up of few individuals located in multiple countries (remote working for the win)

Dev. have years of experience in software development and some blockchain dev.
CMO: have at least 15 years experience in marketing.
Other team members are experienced in various aspects of programming, marketing, or crypto-ecosystem.

CM: head of community manager, not official part of the team, but unofficially she now is, Big experience in crypto communities.



Why the Team is not doxed and remain Anonymous ?

• One of our core team members is in a country where crypto is illegal
• It still early to know how countries see crypto companies (most are still silent)
• The SEC usually comes after crypto companies sooner or later
• Why satoshi remained anonymous ? Ask Kim dotcom, John McCafee, egold and many hunted by gov.
• Taxation wise would be a nightmare

Registered company ?

We can not answer this question, but the products, once ready will be spun off as independent companies.

We view ourselves as a startup, a team with a project (s),
We did not later on decide on adopting a project just to calm down fears, No, we started from day 0 with a project and vision in mind.
Not a pump and dump coin.
We prefer to focus on growing the community organically.
To later be able to deliver the projects we are working on.

We can not stop people from buying too much, even when we put a transaction limit to 1 billion,
that means there will be small-average dumps from time to time, and also growth and supply will create a certain level of pumps.

However, we always keep an eye on the big picture, providing software solutions that integrate our token

When CEX (short for centralized exchange)

In due time,

We will chose appropriate CEX partners when the time is right.

We discussed this subject on Reddit :
https://www.reddit.com/r/NextMoonToken/comments/mjekbl/token_distribution_and_locking_team_tokens/

We have been asked to do a break down of the token ownership.

In addition to give our opinion on locking the marketing and development tokens and burn the contract owner tokens.
Let us start with a very important statement.

We view ourselves as a team with a project to deliver, and Not as a token to pump.

This means, these tokens that we have, we will need them for various needs, from paying people whom we work and cooperate with, to financing development projects to paying for marketing.

Our Project Ownership is as follows: (percentages based on initial launch)

Marketing Wallet : 15 % : 0x9287ce539960188010c6c9667dfb668772a1169f

Soft Development Wallet: 15% : 0xddf592e9858ea4bddf1967193938b72ff5762c4f

Deployer Wallet: 37.7% (initially 40%) : 0xe9740a88cc00095141dafdd2ea201906781c295c

Locking tokens ?

There are no plans to currently lock tokens, dev have considered the issue and even deployed a locker for testing. However the transaction limit to 1 billion token would prevent the locker from releasing the tokens when the lock time is over (sure there are way around this like developing a contract that releases 1 billion at a time but for now we are not going to work on developing and testing a new locker contract)

Thus the Marketing Wallet and Dev wallets are left with no BNB, and would not be used at this stage. They will be only used for late product development and marketing of product(s).

Burning the contract owner tokens?

No planned burns for these 37.7%.

Instead 15% of total , will go to another wallet, with a specific use case that we will announce in 2-3 weeks time.

This leaves the contract owner wallet with only 17.7% These tokens will be used for all the marketing needed to get the token off the ground and also for some early product dev. These tokens will be needed for partnerships, needed for listing costs, needed for 1000 other reason, thus not going to be burned.

Trust us or don't, does not matter

We have seen the way hundreds of tokens launch and then burn their tokens and then pump, till whales have enough and dump ...

No one says things should be like this.

I am sure company owners don't burn their shares after investors buy in, why should we do that with our tokens?

You don't trust us, no problem, don't invest.