follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - anshor1

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 79
1

I partially looked at everything presented here, and I think that sending coins/tokens between members should not be strictly punishable nor 100% proof that alt accounts are involved. Of course, unless it is frequent and organized.
Even if it is the same person behind these exposed accounts, I do not see a serious violation of the "one account-one campaign" rule. All accounts are in different campaigns, or maybe I overlooked something.

I assume that the admin and those who decide have more insight and can assert the connection of these accounts with more certainty.


Your logic is correct, because the only transaction is a gas fee and at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked for help from the community.
And transactions are not carried out frequently, it is not strong proof.

We did that because we didn't know that gas fee transactions and buying and selling between members were prohibited.
Because there are no rules in this forum yet.
If there were rules that prohibited it, our community would not do it.

And as I have explained above, I am only asking about my rights, where the exchange of gas fees and transactions between members is prohibited on this forum.

I asked if there were any rules, because someone would be considered wrong if there were already rules.
That is the law that applies in all countries.

If I and my community are decided wrong after seeing the clear basis of the rules, I and my community will leave this forum back to the old forum.


@anshor1 It is wrong for you to create new accounts to add neutrality to this discussion, attacking those who criticize you. It just makes the overall picture of your case worse.


Lauda reborn is not me and I didn't create it.  I don't know who he/she is at all.




2
No..We will not provide this to protect our privacy.
You can enjoy your privacy but than you are a cheater community family ;D

what do you mean, dude?
Are you who decides a cheater or not?
Are you the judge?? 
or the owner of this forum ?
Do you have the authority to claim it ?
 
Admin and senators are discussing and voting on this.
You have assumed and have decided that our community is a cheater.

3
Hi...grammarian and terminology expert,
I already said we are one community in the real world, please read my post slowly.
We are in the same area and often together.
Do we have to take a photo together to show our togetherness??  ;)
No..We will not provide this to protect our privacy.

Who are you ?
Let the judge decide this?
If one community is deemed wrong and multifaceted, we will leave this forum along with other friends.
I'm just asking for our rights,
Are there any rules that don't allow us to exchange gas fees and carry out transactions in the real world among communities using wallets on this forum?
Please judge us...
But we can only be judged and considered wrong if there are rules governing that.
Are there any rules?

4

If there are accounts that have connected wallets, the same writing style, the same level of activity, the same local language, and the same other variables, then it is definitely an alternative account.


What you say is all just based on assumptions.  People can have different assumptions and perceptions regarding the things you talk about regarding similarities in writing style, etc.  Sometimes it could happen by chance.  If you make a decision based only on assumptions, then the level of accuracy of the truth of the decision obtained cannot be measured.  In my opinion, this should not be done because it would be too speculative.  Laws should not be based on anything speculative.

5

There is a similarity in writing style, posts usually begin with short sentences followed by a comma.
If all accounts follow the same pattern, then we now have a link between them at the blockchain level, and at the writing style level, and so on, checking the rest of the variables until reaching the final result.

Hello, hugeblack
If only the similarity of terminology is a proof, and you are discussing the same way of writing it is a multi-indication, why are you only discussing the word " yeah " ???
you might as well discuss the words "yes I agree, okay, I agree with you, Good Idea, You're right, Yeps... etc"
make it proof that the account is multi.

Why don't you think and try to learn the dialect of each country, English is not native to their country and use a translator.The post results will look the same.

Just at the same time, decide on the opening words that are often used by members here as the basis for the accusation that all accounts are multiple.

Isn't that a common sentence in the market???
This is not a strong basis for answering a case.You should use a more reasonable basis.

6
I agree with something you said. I think that a specific rule would be very necessary for cases like this, which unfortunately we see more frequently. I have an idea of ​​what that rule might be, but I don't think most users will like it, so before I make my proposal public, I'll think about it and then discuss it with the admin to see what he thinks.
Please, as an active official who is currently managing the forum, submit a proposal to the admin regarding clear rules that members must obey.  Because the continuity of this forum, for the sake of the progress of the forum, must be continued.

Most of the members of this forum are a community in the real world, if everyone who is connected is considered multiple, and must be punished, we should have clear rules which, if violated, must be punished.
We must think about the progress of the forum, not just think about careless things which are considered major sins and must be punished.
Shouldn't life have rules, mate?
People can be considered to have made a mistake if there are rules.

If people use the same wallet for several accounts and there is a POA as proof, that is clear proof.
these can be tried and punished.

But if only the wallet is connected, buying and selling transactions between members is considered an error, BM should also include this rule in its general rules.  If there are wallet participants connected, they are considered multiple and cheaters.

Many of our mentors in the community PMed about this issue, he is also one of the former high-ranking officials on this forum.  But currently he is busy in the real world so he hasn't had time to contact the admin to discuss and hasn't had time to return to the forum.
He was just disappointed, this wasn't how it was done.  He has also contributed a lot in the past for the progress of this forum and it is clear that you also know him well.
His message was to take good care of the forum together, don't fight each other.  Because it will damage the forum's reputation.

7
Hello, judge and admin.. all
I would explain that we are a community.
Are communities in crypto that share gas fees and sometimes carry out transactions until the wallet is connected not allowed??
Are there any rules here??
Is this banned in the crypto world??
 
Didn't you see that transaction 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 only transferred the gas fee. Yes, at that time the gas fee was very high so we asked a friend to lend us the gas fee.
And in our community that's normal.
If connected wallets are considered multiple, have their transaction frequency been checked?
Are the transactions frequent??
And if wallet 0x97a4548787985c60a992785b85818df7c4456904 is considered the main account / main wallet, try checking how many coins are there and how big the assets are.
 
The logic is weak if the gas loan and borrowing fee is considered multiple.
It is weak logic if fellow crypto lovers are prohibited from making transactions.
And see wallet 0x44e2a1e469e5eCC2fFf9D9c12b31F564AaDc36F6(elbans) only sent 0.0034 ETH ( $22.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c. And DAMKAR 0x4EE1b083580b1C6792bDD61b3fdC774405b05C9A sent 0.00473 ETH ($16.31) to 0x2d233983356986a82359f73937a618328a0fe50c.
This is considered multity??
Sharing gas and transactions with fellow crypto creators is considered to be the same owner ??
Can you prove it??
Accusers must be able to provide evidence, not just throw a hot ball and then leave by getting rewards from their BM.
 
If the IP is the same, it is assumed that it has the same owner??
Have you never been to a cafe that provides free wifi and made a post together?
Do fellow crypto lovers in the real world in the same community never share hotspots??
Can't they meet each other??
Is this prohibited??
 
There should be clear rules in this forum, not allowing you to use wallets that are connected to fellow members in this forum.
So that we can all understand and keep our wallets clean.
because it can only be considered a violation of the law, if there are already regulations. how can we be considered wrong if there are no clear rules governing it.
 
And when the cases raised in this forum court, only gas fee transactions and buying and selling between communities are considered multiple and the owner is considered to be one person, very lucky for those who are experts even though many of the multiple are untouched??
 
What you raise are only cases of careless people, who think connected wallets are normal in the crypto world. Meanwhile, multi owners who are experts in keeping their wallets will always be safe.
 
Try to imagine if hot wallets on Binance or other exchanges could be tracked, how many wallets in the world would be connected.

8
Altcoinstalks username : anshor1
SegWit BTC Address: bc1qqp56x62nam327ug6ft6qvdapfalgkf4s6wh09q

9
Forum rank : Hero
Bech32 bitcoin Address: bc1qqp56x62nam327ug6ft6qvdapfalgkf4s6wh09q

10
Bitcoin Forum / Re: Is Bitcoin legal?
« on: January 29, 2024, 08:50:23 PM »
Legal or not it doesn't matter as it is decentralized asset so governments has no control of it. It has become legal nowadyas because SEC recently approved Bitcoin ETF. Our country is Bitcoin friendly so I can say that it is legal here though central banks regulated local and international crypto exchanges but it's all good.

You're right, legal or not it is doesn't matter  for  bitcoin .
The government just can legalized but didn't control bitcoin.
In my country, the government is starting to interest in  crypto currency.
Hopefully the government will legalize bitcoin soon, it's not about legalize.
But just for comfortable and secure for bitcoin lovers.

11
Username: anshor1
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qqp56x62nam327ug6ft6qvdapfalgkf4s6wh09q


12
Username: anshor1
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qqp56x62nam327ug6ft6qvdapfalgkf4s6wh09q

13
Altcoinstalks username : anshor1
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qqp56x62nam327ug6ft6qvdapfalgkf4s6wh09q

15
TRON (TRX) Forum + Ecosystem / Re: What is the benefit of holding TRX?
« on: January 13, 2024, 03:14:01 PM »
I think You can stake TRON coin or just hold your TRX in your wallet.
TRON is very potential coin.
I'm TRX holder too.
No doubts about TRON, keep hold and believe TRX will hit more $ 1.5 at the coming years.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 79
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod