How can ICOs come back in the game?

[Domithra]

As crypto gets exposed to the world gradually, new and more convenient features enter the market. Initial Exchange Offerings are taking over with their planned and well structured activities which put the whole project on checks and make sure investors get their holdings after making the buy orders. Again, the coin gets the opportunity to be listed on that exchange which facilitate immediate trading if not planned otherwise by the team.
In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs. What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?

[MrSpasybo]

ICO had a golden time, in late 2017 and 2018, when the BTC price reached ATH $20,000 USD. About 5-10% of ICO projects are still active & start to have the first products to serve the economy. STO and IEO currently dominate the capital mobilization market, but if ICO projects in the past show their strength & value, the ICO season will be back and stronger than ever.

[trauchot]

A lot depends on the companies themselves and their products, because if the company has a completely original product and big investors see and understand this, they will invest in the company even if this company holds an ICO and not IEO. IEO is currently more profitable for all investors and more reliable.

[Alcor]

I hope for state regulation of the ICO, in which the authorized state bodies will check and register the team of each project, which should drastically reduce the level of fraud among them. I also expect general rules for conducting ICOs, where I think that the rules for relations with participants in ICO bounty campaigns will be spelled out. Indeed, now it is absolute chaos, where each team at any time at its discretion changes any rules. This should not be.

[Bobcrypto]

Even as it stand in the current crypto ecosystem, ICOs are still working and it has not left the market. Obviously, ICOs has some notable setback but few project are been launch by ICOs option, though IEOs has gain alot of ground in many start-up projects.i think  there are still room for ICOs to gaining back it usual positions in projects launch.
If scams could be eliminated from the ecosystem, i think ICOs could regain it full statute.

[Domithra]

A lot depends on the companies themselves and their products, because if the company has a completely original product and big investors see and understand this, they will invest in the company even if this company holds an ICO and not IEO. IEO is currently more profitable for all investors and more reliable.

A working product with high level of demand on the market is very important for the survival and success of a project and its token sales irrespective of being an ICO, STO or IEO. However, for ICOs to come back in the game in general, ICOs must go beyond just a working product but need to be restructured with regulations in other to eliminate the frequent scam projects.

[ICOrealityshow]

You got to understand that everything is good at certain time, it just can’t be like that again. If you were in 2015, you were in 2015 only once, you can’t be back in that year again. So once something is done, it’s just done. ICOs can’t get the kind of popularity it had in past, as it’s past that zone now. In current times, there are new terms like STO or IEO. And in future, there is likely to be something else, there is no way time is going to reverse. So we just got to keep on moving instead of waiting for same thing again, just so vital to understand the Bitcoin History, to help you with so many things.

[Domithra]

You got to understand that everything is good at certain time, it just can’t be like that again. If you were in 2015, you were in 2015 only once, you can’t be back in that year again. So once something is done, it’s just done. ICOs can’t get the kind of popularity it had in past, as it’s past that zone now. In current times, there are new terms like STO or IEO. And in future, there is likely to be something else, there is no way time is going to reverse. So we just got to keep on moving instead of waiting for same thing again, just so vital to understand the Bitcoin History, to help you with so many things.

Of course, traveling back in time is not possible but history can always repeat itself and even in a more better way. This is one of the reasons why Bitcoin enthusiasts still hold on to Bitcoin with the believe that Bitcoin can repeat its ATH of $20K and even beyond. I'm totally not in support with the idea that ICOs cannot get back in the game once it had its time. What ICOs need now is restructuring its activities in order to put few things to checks especially placing checks on projects to eliminate fake/scam projects.

[pedangrusak]

the basic thing from the current decline in ICO is the decline in global crypto prices and also too many ICO players who are increasingly making investors think again for investment. for that we need standard rules on ICO to minimize ICO fraud and I hope they return to shine like before 2018

[vegasus]

When there will be many good projects born from ICOs, then people may be interested in joining ICOs again. If people are interested in joining ICOs, it means ICOs probably to have a good future. But it won't be easy to make people be interested again after there were too many shit ICO projects so far.

[Rofiastuti]

When there will be many good projects born from ICOs, then people may be interested in joining ICOs again. If people are interested in joining ICOs, it means ICOs probably to have a good future. But it won't be easy to make people be interested again after there were too many shit ICO projects so far.

That's right I absolutely agree with your idea . If some project   can attract many people to join, surely the ICO will be good, can survive and compete and can develop in the future

[Majaz]

I think it is very difficult to be repeated again. The possibility could be if it is replaced with new packaging and a new logo. I am sure, the bounty hunters have already been hurt by their hearts.

[Niteroy]

In the near future, the ICO is unlikely to return, because now the trend is IEO, and if someone invests, it often chooses IEO, because they are considered more secure. Scam projects greatly undermined the credibility of ICOs, so investors are more cautious about ICOs.

[Contagem]

IEO is the same ICO but with slightly different characteristics, so I think that ICO will change the form of fundraising, but will continue to exist. I think that for startups, ICO is a good way to raise the required amount in a short period of time. But with the regulation of the ICOs market, interest in investing in them will grow.

[Alcor]

In the near future, the ICO is unlikely to return, because now the trend is IEO, and if someone invests, it often chooses IEO, because they are considered more secure. Scam projects greatly undermined the credibility of ICOs, so investors are more cautious about ICOs.

In my opinion, it is enough that states begin to regulate the activities of ICOs and again they will be able to revive again very quickly. Enough now through such regulation to remove the high level of fraud among ICO projects, and their popularity will again rise to almost the same level.