What do you think about coins issued without ICO?

[AltLogan]

I think they are more reliable. I would choose them. Scammers will not just distribute tokens and invest their money.

Scammers can earn some more money and disappear. this is how it works..
If it's an ICO that has nothing then no one would invest in it and they get nothing too.

Is there any security measures we can do ourselves to avoid it?
Or it depends on airdrops or ICO creators?

[eldial]

I think coins issued without ICO is very reliable in the market  because it can be changes directly to the investors without  signing of agreement and it should be a scam supposively but in terms of changing into a cash basis is too not easy to works for it.

[Bica]

I think they are more reliable. I would choose them. Scammers will not just distribute tokens and invest their money.

Scammers can earn some more money and disappear. this is how it works..
If it's an ICO that has nothing then no one would invest in it and they get nothing too.

People invest in projects having nothing. And they disappear. It works like this. I haven't heard of other stories.

[AltLogan]

I think they are more reliable. I would choose them. Scammers will not just distribute tokens and invest their money.

Scammers can earn some more money and disappear. this is how it works..
If it's an ICO that has nothing then no one would invest in it and they get nothing too.

So then I guess there is nothing to trust in.
Scammers can be everywhere, right?
What's your secured ideas then?
People invest in projects having nothing. And they disappear. It works like this. I haven't heard of other stories.

[Marryan]

I think they are more reliable. I would choose them. Scammers will not just distribute tokens and invest their money.

Scammers can earn some more money and disappear. this is how it works..
If it's an ICO that has nothing then no one would invest in it and they get nothing too.

Is there any security measures we can do ourselves to avoid it?
Or it depends on airdrops or ICO creators?

All we can do is to learn the market properly and don't invest in unknown things.
I don't know any other ways out. Especially when you're a novice and don't know much about the market.
It's not so simple as many of you think it is.

[AltLogan]

I think they are more reliable. I would choose them. Scammers will not just distribute tokens and invest their money.

Scammers can earn some more money and disappear. this is how it works..
If it's an ICO that has nothing then no one would invest in it and they get nothing too.

Is there any security measures we can do ourselves to avoid it?
Or it depends on airdrops or ICO creators?

All we can do is to learn the market properly and don't invest in unknown things.
I don't know any other ways out. Especially when you're a novice and don't know much about the market.
It's not so simple as many of you think it is.

Agree!
But I mean that not only well known services are secured since scammers are finding ways to pass by all.

[backfirst77]

Usually coins or tokens do ICO to sell their products. But there are also those who do not go through the ICO process as usual. CYFM and MFTU are tokens distributed not through the ICO mechanism and are listed in many exchanges. This proves that this system without ICO can be done because also.

[ismelda_ita]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Of course, it's different. Coins without an ICO usually function to serve in the exchange of goods or services. So the price of each coin reflects the form of cash and liquidity. While ICO coins are generally more focused on a project. Their token is created to meet certain types of market instruments or is a single business. even making it on existing blockchain supports smart contracts like Ethereum and Waves.

[Marryan]

Usually coins or tokens do ICO to sell their products. But there are also those who do not go through the ICO process as usual. CYFM and MFTU are tokens distributed not through the ICO mechanism and are listed in many exchanges. This proves that this system without ICO can be done because also.

So are they more reliable ones? Or it's also easy to get into scam?

[Zed0X]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Are you trying to compare the 100% Airdropped tokens and ICO funded projects?

If that is what you meant, then here is what I think:
They appear to have a similar pattern (many will pop up and many will soon die or fail) but the mortality rate of ICOs are a bit lower compared to airdrops. Although I can say that I have seen some notable 100% airdropped projects I joined that are performing better than ICOs but atleast 90% of them are gone now.

[Marryan]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Are you trying to compare the 100% Airdropped tokens and ICO funded projects?

If that is what you meant, then here is what I think:
They appear to have a similar pattern (many will pop up and many will soon die or fail) but the mortality rate of ICOs are a bit lower compared to airdrops. Although I can say that I have seen some notable 100% airdropped projects I joined that are performing better than ICOs but atleast 90% of them are gone now.

That's exactly why I think it's better to invest in Bitcoin or Ethereum. They're not going to disappear in nearest time.
Am I right? Or ICOs may be more potential?

[tamango]

Ico is not necessary to be succesful for a project there are. Some good cases of project without ico like rebellious that have done only airdrop. Community support is very important ..

[babfurkan]

I know an example MCT(Master Contract Token). They issued all coins only with airdrop. if you hold any NEO token you get 1k MCT. The team were working hard and try to create new ecosystem for NEO. But later I sold my airdrop tokens in return about 80 usd and stop to follow team and new process

[Dinid]

Not every crypto project need an ICO.

Q : What is ICO ?
A : ICO (initial coin offering) or (initial currency offering) is a type of funding using cryptocurrencies. Mostly the process is done by crowdfunding but private ICO's are becoming more common.
Source : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_coin_offering

Ico is related to crowdfunding.
So, Big Self-Funded Companies that have real business ecosystem,  do not need to launch any ICO to raise fund.
These Companies may be create their digital crypto currency (coin or token) is to improve/ease their business payment feature.

[ComeBack]

If some coins didn't issued or have an ICO it means they have enough funds for the project but for those project that has an ICO they need a huge amount of money to launch their project that's why they doing it