Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: ayatoslaw on April 09, 2019, 07:40:17 AM
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
-
As a bounty hunter, we must anticipate this. If the ICO is marginalized and there are no more projects that use bounty as a media campaign, then we must be prepared to face it. And more and more IEO will be done to sell the tokens. If there are no more hunters, they have to look for other fields to work on. But in my opinion the bounty is still needed to help the promotion, because with the increasing number of IEO competition there must still be assistance for promotion. We can see that there are several IEOs on latoken that have been postponed several times because they didn't get good sales results.
-
In my opinion, the help of bounty hunters in the release of new tokens will always be needed. Even if new tokens are distributed through exchanges, projects will still need to attract the attention of investors. Such forums as this one do very well with this and I don’t think that soon something will change in fundraising. Still, ICO projects were much more public and easier. We need the regulation of the activities of the ICO by the states and then the activities of the ICO will take on a new life.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
You point out a good point there crypto hunters will really face big problems in future if more and more ICO is successful with IEO however i doubt that all potential ICOs will be able to enjoy going into IEO.
-
There are positive and negative impacts from the IEO for us bounty hunters.
Positive: Risk of scam can be reduced because there are already exchanges that accept it.
Negative: Maybe the use of bounty hunter services to promote ico or projects will decrease and we must be prepared for that.
-
Companies are used to using bounty hunters to advertise their project and I think if ICOs will die completely, there will be other ways that companies will use to advertise and I am sure that bounty hunters will participate in this new advertisement.
-
I think that the promotion of projects in social networks will be relevant, but will change its structure. For example, now there are ideas about how to conduct marketing campaigns for offline businesses or, for example, to increase the popularity of a particular person, blogger, musician, artist. Therefore, it is possible that bounty hunters services will be in demand further.
-
There are two types of Bounty hunter future. First is the one that loses hope and then leave, they may not be back or will be back someday when the market is better. And the one who always stays in bounty and keep doing, I believe they will have more chance to be successful as noted they know the right bounty to join.
-
There are positive and negative impacts from the IEO for us bounty hunters.
Positive: Risk of scam can be reduced because there are already exchanges that accept it.
Negative: Maybe the use of bounty hunter services to promote ico or projects will decrease and we must be prepared for that.
for the negative impacts that exist as a hunter inevitably must accept the current situation and reality,
but big hopes that hunters can still participate in ICO, IEO to promote their projects
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
You point out a good point there crypto hunters will really face big problems in future if more and more ICO is successful with IEO however i doubt that all potential ICOs will be able to enjoy going into IEO.
what if in the end the project petential doesn't use ICO anymore if indeed they fail to register in the IEO,
because a lot of projects are good but they don't do ICO, like GRIN.
and this must be a good discussion to find a solution.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
If really this day come there might be new jobs for hunter or bounty hunters are totally jobless and i bet the price of crypto will be greatly affected as well i believe a big portion of the total volume is crypto is make up by bounty hunters.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
From the thread's topic, then the full adoption of IEO comes up. We have been thinking, what if ICOs comes to an end, and that was tackled before now. Now IEO has come to take the place, hunters will have to move to traders, that will be the alternative, because ICOs will not be lasting for a long time again.
-
~snip~ if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed, ~snip~
I don't think it will happen, bro. ICO should come back to its best performance again. I think it is only about time to make investors believe again to ICOs. Even if there is a new way in the initial token sale, named IEO, but I assume ICOs won't disappear.
-
No need to worry if ICO will be reduced to being replaced by the IEO, we must be flexible and not easily discouraged. Moreover, work in the digital world is not just a bounty hunter, there are many job opportunities in the digital world such as being a trader or investor.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
It is not just assumption it is the real fact with bounty hunters,as IEO takes over the market of ICO the service of bounty hunters will be come less,companies will be looking forward on Ambassadors representing their company in their area of interest and change the trend of campaign.
-
It is not a secret that bounty hunting work is not the same as it is before and to be honest it is safe to say that bounty hunting work is more like a hubby now a something that you can't really depend on that is a fact since the fall of the market before even IEO appear of surface.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
The Future is bad since no new Bounty program will be created if the ICO's was not prospered in these period thats why it must be regulated now in order to create interest since it will improve the security function of the ICO investors, for me thats my concern upto these day.
-
I think the purpose of the tokens that are sold directly through the IEO has many shortcomings, can we see what products they have, even the real ICO projects and have good products fail to run the ICO.
This is a new trend in investing, I prefer the products the project offers and their future goals rather than following the IEO, because there will be a very fast dump when there are no traders who buy these tokens on the market, even at low prices and make investors need to be patient to hold coins for a long time.
We don't despair, because bounty hunters have many members and I'm sure, without the introduction of good products, I think investors will change their minds. This will last a while and the ICO will still be there.
-
Unfortunately now the market ico is bad which in turn greatly affects the participants of the bounty campaigns. There are a lot of fraudulent projects, and this frightens investors. If the regulation ico appears, then the interest of investors in this area will increase and only in this case the participants of the bounty will have the opportunity to earn.
-
I understand your concern but I do not think that there's cause for alarm.
I have seen many of these projects that did IEO doing bounty programs.
So bounty programs will not be affected by the emergence of IEOS.
-
I'm a litle bit curious about if there is no interest again in ICO, right? Well, there are actually still some types of crowdfunding, such as now the popular system is IEO. f the companies still want to hold the bounty program for the IEO, there will still exist. However, if they are not willing, the bounty program may be decreased and then disappeared.
-
It seems to me that we need to wait some time and still fall into place. The popularity of IEO projects will fall as sharply as it took off. I think that the most acceptable option of fundraising is the state-regulated projects of the ICO. If state bodies fight against fraud and protect the rights of investors, ICO projects will simply be revived as the most convenient and simple form of raising public funds.
-
The chances of Bounty hunters to join such program without interest in ICO will be decreased. Bounty is part of the ICO projects. However now, there is also IEO that sometimes need the bounty programs. As long as there are crowdfunding programs, there may be chances for bounty hunters to participate.
-
Bounty is also not about the promotion of coins from ICO but there are also many types of bounties, such as:
Bounty BUG program.
Community Bounty.
Bounty share project.
So, hunters will continue to exist as long as crypto still exists in this world.
-
For now I think we are still safe with the bounties. I see some bounties both doing bounties and IEOs however this can change for sure. With a bull market, I think the ICOs will become popular again, but till that time IEOs can take over the coin sales.
Bounty hunters have too many problems right now both with the IEOs and the payments.
-
I think we are already seeing less ICO bounties than we had a year ago, which is good thing overall in my opinion. It's possible that ICO's launched last year will begin having more bounties, possible rewarded in ETH (which they are hodling), espeically as Ethereum's price rises. These older projects will need to increase their marketing to stay competitive against all the new projects still starting up. I've noticed some projects that are now engaging in these, while they are already trading on exchanges etc.
I think within a year or two there will be more bounties for projects that have launched, than the scarcity of ICO projects that will either launch as an IEO or otherwise require KYC for bounty hunters as an STO, which is never as popular.
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
I think It is a good question mate. the future of bounty hunters If there is no interest in the ICO, It is the end of the bounty. You can try do trading
-
It is true that the ICO is now completely destroyed because of the many frauds.
ICO need support and help to promote the project and that's where we as bounty hunters are needed.
If there is no ICO that does not need a bounty hunter, that is true.
But with the IEO that makes investors safer for sure when all new projects choose the IEO, they will also need bounty hunters to promote their projects.
we don't need to be afraid of this change, because indeed this is a good thing for digital currencies in the future.
-
Yes it might be true. IEO projects doesnt need more marketing because of the hype of the IEOs and they dont need us anymore.
-
We must strive to survive in any place. If there will be no bounty we will find new way to work! Anyway advertisement is always needed!
-
We must strive to survive in any place. If there will be no bounty we will find new way to work! Anyway advertisement is always needed!
What do you mean to find another way is to look for extra income outside the bounty?
because if the bounty is not there then the ad service is also not there, because it might have been shifted with something else,
like the ICO which will be displaced by the IEO.
-
As a bounty hunter, we must anticipate this. If the ICO is marginalized and there are no more projects that use bounty as a media campaign, then we must be prepared to face it. And more and more IEO will be done to sell the tokens. If there are no more hunters, they have to look for other fields to work on. But in my opinion the bounty is still needed to help the promotion, because with the increasing number of IEO competition there must still be assistance for promotion. We can see that there are several IEOs on latoken that have been postponed several times because they didn't get good sales results.
Yes, you have a point here, assuming there are no longer ICOs because IEOs has gained ground on the crypto ecosystem, it will still be very important for new start up to spreed information about their projects and at the same time, increase their project awareness and popularity.
Again, i think many projects, from time to time may further promote their projects even after successful IEOs or even ICOs, through signature campaigns and social media platforms or on the crypto communities like Altcoinstalks forum and others.
-
I think there are still a lot of places for bounty hunters if the ICO is no longer attractive to them. One of them is the IEO. I think here the bounty hunters will be more attractive and comfortable in it. Because IEO is a little better than ICO.
-
ICOs cannot be replaced by IEOs. And there will be less successful IEOs at the end. Only important exchanges such as Binance, will be successful in this. And there are hundreds of projects. So, no worries.
-
ICO is an irreplaceable part of cryptocurrency. It just changes from this form to another form. Talking about IEO, when people are no longer hyped on it, traditional ICO will take its steam and become popular again. Even when IEO is on trend, there're still some good ICOs. They're just harder to be found.
-
ICO is an irreplaceable part of cryptocurrency. It just changes from this form to another form. Talking about IEO, when people are no longer hyped on it, traditional ICO will take its steam and become popular again. Even when IEO is on trend, there're still some good ICOs. They're just harder to be found.
yes you are right, almost every time I look at web ICO and look for a new ICO on google, I still believe there is a good and promising ICO, even new projects that easily run the IEO are not sure to get a good price in exchange for a long time.
In the end, after investors can easily buy an initial coin in crypto exchange, there will be a price decrease because there will be a high selling transaction rather than buying. Because of that I look more at the product of the new project that I follow than the price. Because if the project is good then the #DevelopmentTeam will start marketing with the help of bounty hunters
-
As a bounty hunter, we must anticipate this. If the ICO is marginalized and there are no more projects that use bounty as a media campaign, then we must be prepared to face it. And more and more IEO will be done to sell the tokens. If there are no more hunters, they have to look for other fields to work on. But in my opinion the bounty is still needed to help the promotion, because with the increasing number of IEO competition there must still be assistance for promotion. We can see that there are several IEOs on latoken that have been postponed several times because they didn't get good sales results.
Yes, you have a point here, assuming there are no longer ICOs because IEOs has gained ground on the crypto ecosystem, it will still be very important for new start up to spreed information about their projects and at the same time, increase their project awareness and popularity.
Again, i think many projects, from time to time may further promote their projects even after successful IEOs or even ICOs, through signature campaigns and social media platforms or on the crypto communities like Altcoinstalks forum and others.
This is true, I've noticed more ICO's from 2017-2018 now using Ether as bounties which is great to see. I'm also noticing IEOs starting to have bounties without naming any names (but DYOR and find them). For me I much prefer to engage in an IEO bounty with the same bounty allocation as an ICO, and is much more likely to successfully raise funds unlike 95% of the ICOs at the moment (if not more). Not forgetting that these IEO tokens can reach exchanges at 3-5x the value 8)
-
when everyone forgets the ICO and many say that the bounty hunter is not needed, in my opinion it's a mistake.
now the IEO is still small and the information is also easy to get, but when all projects using the IEO will definitely need bounty hunter services to promote it.
I have never been worried about this problem because I am sure the bounty hunter will always be needed.
-
This is true, I've noticed more ICO's from 2017-2018 now using Ether as bounties which is great to see. I'm also noticing IEOs starting to have bounties without naming any names (but DYOR and find them). For me I much prefer to engage in an IEO bounty with the same bounty allocation as an ICO, and is much more likely to successfully raise funds unlike 95% of the ICOs at the moment (if not more). Not forgetting that these IEO tokens can reach exchanges at 3-5x the value 8)
I've seen some IEO bounties recently but I don't highly recommend any of them. They just borrowed the IEO to cause attention and hype. I agree that engaging in an IEO bounty is much more profitable than an ICO. However, being labelled as an IEO at this time, one project gets a lot of attraction via social media. Bounty seems unnecessary.
-
Not all teams will be able to collect funds through the exchange in the format IЕO. The exchanges select only some of the proposed projects, however, the majority will be forced to collect funds in our usual ICO format. The issue of reducing fraud over time will somehow be resolved, including government regulation. Therefore, I believe that the services of bounty hunters will still be in demand.
-
we have to think about getting bounty support because in my opinion investment is very difficult without a bounty prize,
So we must maintain the development of this bounty,
It's better if we can make our own bounty,
-
In any way and in the future, there is no way that bounty hunter services will not be needed. project will not rely only on IEO as not all exchanges will welcome all the project. They might be luck to get one or at most two, so there will be need to spread to other exchanges.
-
we all know that ICO was an avenue for scammers to rob people of their hard earn money. IEO remains the next big and great thing to attract investors back to crypto and avoid weak and useless project without future. IEO all the way.
-
it's true with everything you say, that I feel that after the IEO at this time it is very influential on the development of ico, and I hope that everything can go well.
-
for me personal, i will move into trading full time. in case we ran short of bounties which is also not possible because project do need marketing to get the interest of the investors. currently, i even prefer projects PLANNING to do IEO. I always check to make sure that 80% of bounties i am partaking will conduct an IEO.
-
Well if it happens to ICO, though I hope not, I think it would be possible that there would be less need for the bounty hunters. Maybe as a bounty hunter, it would be good if we find other things to make use of our time, could be in the real world or even here in the crypto world. Maybe we can do some tradings or even maybe mae ourselves as investors if our financial status allows.
-
It is possible that not all companies will refuse to take part in bounty participants, so there are little-known projects that need more people to know about them.
-
Market is started booming slowly slowly interest in ICOs will also increase. We have to be little more patient thing will be alright gradually. I think to do IEOs developer needs to pay hefty amount before sale the coin on exchange please correct me if I am wrong. Promotion is always needed to make the project popular for mass adoption otherwise IEO coins value will also drop drastically if not widely known. IEOs momentum for sometime then if not properly promoted.
-
Whether IEO or ICO, bounty hunters will still be relevant, dev and team will always need bounty hunters to promote their project. We should understand that not all project can conduct IEO on big exchanges, and as long as you cannot use big exchange for your IEO then you need bounty hunters to spread your project.
-
now is the year the IEO exploded after many ICOs failed and scam. therefore all investors turn to the IEO. I think bounty hunters are still needed from either the IEO or the ICO. the role of the bounty hunter is very important in both cases.
-
The selection of bounty now need to be approached more carefully. Maybe temporarily, but the time has passed when it was possible to cover quality with quantity. Now this is the way to waste time. Only good quality projects with a real existing prototype and real partnerships with institutional funds.
-
now is the year the IEO exploded after many ICOs failed and scam. therefore all investors turn to the IEO. I think bounty hunters are still needed from either the IEO or the ICO. the role of the bounty hunter is very important in both cases.
but in some cases, the rewards were not much, even very little,
some bounty projects that will follow the IEO or have already registered in the market mostly allocate very little funds,
if you add up the number of people who take part in the bounty for 2-3 months only get a few tens of dollars.
-
If bounties end or worth nothing, I will remember that I am a Ph.D. student :) I hope it won't end :)
-
Whether IEO or ICO, bounty hunters will still be relevant, dev and team will always need bounty hunters to promote their project. We should understand that not all project can conduct IEO on big exchanges, and as long as you cannot use big exchange for your IEO then you need bounty hunters to spread your project.
IEO's are the best alternatives to ICO because most of the projects that conduct ICO's is a scam, and this kind of
image on cryptocurrencies needs to be changed. Maybe you're not updated on latest happenings and you don't
know that most of the projects that conduct an IEO have bounties. :o
-
No matter how many ICO appear, if the IEO is able to hardcap in a matter of a few seconds and can immediately list in the market,
so I am sure the ICO will be less interested, and we can be sure the new project is willing to wait a few months just to get the project to enter the IEO,
and if the ICO is not interested, then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true, there will be fewer project choices, and the bounty hunter's future will be at stake here,
even though this is only my assumption. but what if that really happened?
because every year crypto always develops, and it's our job to think about the worst.
give your opinion as a bounty hunter.
If there is no interest in ICO, I think You can be a trader. You can do day trading and wait until there is good ICO.
-
now is the year the IEO exploded after many ICOs failed and scam. therefore all investors turn to the IEO. I think bounty hunters are still needed from either the IEO or the ICO. the role of the bounty hunter is very important in both cases.
but in some cases, the rewards were not much, even very little,
some bounty projects that will follow the IEO or have already registered in the market mostly allocate very little funds,
if you add up the number of people who take part in the bounty for 2-3 months only get a few tens of dollars.
Personally I didn't find a correlation between higher bounty allocations for ICOs than IEOs, from my calculations of a current IEO and ICO bounties (https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=116632) the allocation is very similar to that of ICOs. This is even taking into account the active number of participants. Therefore I can see why bounty hunters lean towards IEOs more, because the risk is slightly lower, while the rewards are more of less the same. It's dependant on the project imo, rather than if it's an ICO or IEO.
-
The bounty hunter has a major role to play in every project announcement I don't think bounty hunters should be left out because of lEO you also have to think about those people that are not exchange but are interested in the project through the ICO in this case there are long future for bounty hunters because the project still have to be promoted through the media.
-
it is absolutely true that it will slowly become dim if the IEO gets better, and I really believe that the IEO will be more potential now.
-
At present, ICO is still the first choice. And even IEO, I think, they also need the services of Bounty Hunters to help promote their projects or coins. In this case, as long as there are new tokens offered, bounty hunters will still exist. If not, I am sure that bounty hunters have a strategy that is sufficient with the provision of coins that they previously obtained for trading or investing.
-
If bounties end or worth nothing, I will remember that I am a Ph.D. student :)
So, I bet you will move to real job if bounty will be no worth again. Anyway, do you make bounty as your main job now?
I advise to not make it as a main job or a single job only. Bounty is just suitable for a side job, so it means you absolutely need another job in real life as your main job.
-
If you look globally, then I would say that Bounty Hunters last year had little money. However, those who wanted it, earned. It's always like this. You need perseverance to find a good company and follow all the rules of participation in it to earn something.
-
I think bounty hunters who are always doing there job continue when the market is on crisis they always got success.
-
I think bounty hunters who are always doing there job continue when the market is on crisis they always got success.
yeah, agree on you, bounty hunters are ther reason why most of the projects are being successful, its because we the bounty hunters are the one who spread news in the platform and different social media platforms.
-
Companies are used to using bounty hunters to advertise their project and I think if ICOs will die completely, there will be other ways that companies will use to advertise and I am sure that bounty hunters will participate in this new advertisement.
I don't think ICO projects will die. This is the easiest and best way to raise funds for the development of the ICO project. Soon, state regulation of ICO activity should appear and then it should be revived, since fraud should disappear or at least decrease significantly.
-
I dont believe it. Even some big IEOs had their bounty campaign. Actually been joined few already but never received any token yet from a bounty that conduct IEO. I believe hunters are still needed there is no cheaper way of marketing to the public aside from bounty. Its easy as well to manage I guess. Imagine how much they can save than doing a very expensive advertisement on some famous site. Bounty will never dies unless provision had been set to the community on a legal basis.
-
I think that the participants of the bounty companies will soon start to scatter
Now there is no profit at all
may be reconsidered payment
because as now it is generally free work
I have the last few companies, the token was exchanged, and there is less than $ 1.
-
then it is certain that the bounty hunter will no longer be needed,
and if this is true,.
All projects need community and members to join thier communication channels, project without supporters cant success, So i see all legit projects has to give at least 2% of thier token as a bounty in order to gain support.
-
I think projects without bounty hunters will not be able to live, because promotion is necessary to attract investors. Without investors, projects will simply die. Therefore, I think bounty hunters will have a lot of work to do.
-
I think projects without bounty hunters will not be able to live, because promotion is necessary to attract investors. Without investors, projects will simply die. Therefore, I think bounty hunters will have a lot of work to do.
Yes, every project requires large community members, there are still good ICO projects and I believe ICO will not be abandoned. There are still many new projects that require bounty hunter services to build a community.
-
Many bounty hunters may feel the negative things about it. Many of us feel worried about their future Bounty hunter will work if there are trusted ICO, IEO, and other crowdfunding systems in order to get the payment. However so far, we met many scams. However, I'm still believe that there are still worthy bounty programs to struggling.