Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Bobcrypto on March 21, 2019, 04:55:24 PM
-
Guys, this is what i think about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) and Initial Coin Offering (ICO); the biggest problem with ICOs is that they’re not monitored by any third parties. Basically, anyone can launch an ICO, as long as you have a white paper to convince investors to put funds into your company.
On the other hand, an IEO is a very, if not entirely, different model. While both ICOs and IEOs share the rationale of an initial public offering (IPO), in an IEO, the exchange becomes an administrator.
To conduct an IEO, the project team must meet and comply with the exchange’s requirements in order to launch the token sale. Contributors are, therefore, protected by the exchange.
Although some may argue that the exchange may go along with the project team to scam customers, this will put the exchange’s reputation at risk. Exchanges that look for a sustainable business model would not consider taking such an unethical move.
However, i have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon. What do you think?
-
Guys, this is what i think about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) and Initial Coin Offering (ICO); the biggest problem with ICOs is that they’re not monitored by any third parties. Basically, anyone can launch an ICO, as long as you have a white paper to convince investors to put funds into your company.
On the other hand, an IEO is a very, if not entirely, different model. While both ICOs and IEOs share the rationale of an initial public offering (IPO), in an IEO, the exchange becomes an administrator.
To conduct an IEO, the project team must meet and comply with the exchange’s requirements in order to launch the token sale. Contributors are, therefore, protected by the exchange.
Although some may argue that the exchange may go along with the project team to scam customers, this will put the exchange’s reputation at risk. Exchanges that look for a sustainable business model would not consider taking such an unethical move.
However, i have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon. What do you think?
Thats a fearless forcast and I agree with you since IEO is more secure in terms of Investing money But not all Exchange platform im doubting to others because scammers are innovative and easy to adopt if necessary who knows Scambugs are desguising as an Exchange, offering IEO only trust to the legit and has credibility like Binance and other well established Exchange Platform.
-
Raising funds through exchanges seem to be the trend now and make exchanges are following up
The IEO conducted already have been successful as sales didn't last up to 5minutes in some instance.
So it's possible that IEO will replace ico.
-
I cannot imagine a cryptocurrency start up exchange launching their token sale on another exchange. With that in mind, IEOs will take a good chunk of the ICOs market but it will not completely take over.
-
To begin, I gave you karma. I have already written my thoughts in a Russian thread about this and I will write it briefly here. IEO in my opinion is not the best option for new projects, too easy, sell/buy/bid, and if it is a fraudulent project? Everyone will lose money instantly. ICO also provides an opportunity for in-depth study of the project, analysis, communication. This option is much better for all investors.
-
I am pleased to see this progress, the developers have begun to see concerns from the ICO scam and to date many investors have been deceived by fake ICO.
I have seen many exchange projects and have their own tokens then traded on their exchanges
-
If you use the word "THINK" then your subject shouldn't be "IEO will overtake ICOs soon" you sounded too sure but then your post then didn't prove anything. I was looking for. Proof. IEO is becoming strong but is about to have a test of time so don't be too excited about it yet
-
I can say that IEO is a truly amazing fundraising way for crypto this bypass the potential threat or scam on such projects. If I were to choose for investment Id likely to used this method as exchanges doing it are big and impossible to endorse worst or scam projects.
-
Currently the IEO phenomenon has started to have a new trend in doing sales of new coins or tokens. Because it can directly be purchased in the exchange in collaboration and this is more interesting for investors. If the sale through IEO is estimated that the altcoin will be a larger listing, at least the listing in Exchange where the next IEO. And slowly began to leave the ICO system sometime.
-
If you use the word "THINK" then your subject shouldn't be "IEO will overtake ICOs soon" you sounded too sure but then your post then didn't prove anything. I was looking for. Proof. IEO is becoming strong but is about to have a test of time so don't be too excited about it yet
It's all speculation/assumption.
Let us not forget that IEOs only gained popularity because of Binance. There were prior IEOs but never really had the expected success. I have not seen any clear data yet that supports the idea of IEOs replacing ICOs.
-
I don't think so IEOs will overtake ICOs soon. At present we know a reputed exchange already launched 2 IEOs very successfully and even investors love it but in my opinion its very early to comment on IEOs. Let's wait for some more IEO's to be launched. Its seems easy now but by the time I believe IEOs will also face rough phase like ICOs on the contrary I still have full faith on ICOs that will revive again in coming months.
-
AEO is essentially a new kind of ICO.
ICO in its usual form has ceased to be interesting for investors and to collect the necessary amount of funds, and therefore the exchanges have come up with an initial exchange offer.This is beneficial for exchanges and investors, because the token is immediately added to a large top exchange where it expects growth.
-
To begin, I gave you karma. I have already written my thoughts in a Russian thread about this and I will write it briefly here. IEO in my opinion is not the best option for new projects, too easy, sell/buy/bid, and if it is a fraudulent project? Everyone will lose money instantly. ICO also provides an opportunity for in-depth study of the project, analysis, communication. This option is much better for all investors.
First, thank for the karma, but the IEOs lunch on exchanges will definitely dent their reputation if the new projects ended a fraudulent or scam projects.
I think, in my opinion, IEOs stand a better chance to succeed than ICOs because no reputable exchange will like it's names drag to a scam or fraudulent practices.
-
Quite right, few people trust ICO already and many companies understand that it is better to do IEO than ICO and the success rate will be in tens or even in hundreds of times higher, of course, also depends on where the company will make IEO.
-
Looking at how IEO is running I can say without any doubt that IEO has no chance to even come close to ICO, look at how things running in Binance the last 3 IEO even tho I know a lot of people who tried to join I am yet to see anyone successfully joined the IEO, to be honest, I am getting the feeling that this IEO is just another way to milk money from people, simply fake sell IEO and list it on exchange with x3 the price and make money from thin air.
-
I have no idea about it for now. IEOs may take the attention of many people with the concept as a safer way for investors to have assets. But ICOs already become a part of cryptocurrency for long time. I think people have already trusted in this way.
-
I totally agree with the title given by TS because there are a lot of them in various forums.
I agree that the IEO will defeat the ICO but later on, Bounty Hunters will not know where to make money from the IEO because it is clear that the IEO did not give a Bounty prize.
-
This is alarming for the bounty hunters that IEOs are now becoming popular and if this popularity increases rapidly, no ICOs will take place sooner or later in my opinion. If ICOs aren't occur, bounty hunters will become worthless.
-
IEO and ICO, two most popular methods of coins sell and buying. Initial exchange offering is more more popular than initial coin offering.
-
Yes it is true. As of now, we saw great returns in IEO.
-
So what you are saying now is that the success or failure of a start up projects lies at the hands of these centralized exchanges? That doesn't sound right. IEOs may have some advantages to investors but overtaking the ICO model won't be good for the cryptocurrency market.
-
The problem is that the exchanges expose serious conditions to projects that conduct IEO - including financial ones. Not all projects are ready to go for these conditions. Therefore, the ICO will definitely remain. Simply, the developers will have a choice of format for ICO
-
~snip~ I have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon.
Well, it is pretty true that IEO has a better way to provide a token sale. Moreover, if it is held on a big exchange like Binance or Bittrex. They will be easier to attract investors in this way. It also ensures people with security, transparency, and convenience. Actually, I am not really sure if it can replace ICOs very soon, but it should have a chance.
-
The biggest advantaje of Initial Exchange Offering is the coin you just buy will be listed on that exchange in maximun 1 week,in this way the buyer can recover at least a part on his investment quickly.
-
IEO makes every party be easier to sell and buy tokens. I think IEO will be a favorite way to sell tokens in the beginning stage. Since ICO has a bad reputation, while IEO seems quite successful, I am sure that project teams will consider choosing IEO than ICO.
-
Guys, this is what i think about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) and Initial Coin Offering (ICO); the biggest problem with ICOs is that they’re not monitored by any third parties. Basically, anyone can launch an ICO, as long as you have a white paper to convince investors to put funds into your company.
On the other hand, an IEO is a very, if not entirely, different model. While both ICOs and IEOs share the rationale of an initial public offering (IPO), in an IEO, the exchange becomes an administrator.
To conduct an IEO, the project team must meet and comply with the exchange’s requirements in order to launch the token sale. Contributors are, therefore, protected by the exchange.
Although some may argue that the exchange may go along with the project team to scam customers, this will put the exchange’s reputation at risk. Exchanges that look for a sustainable business model would not consider taking such an unethical move.
However, i have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon. What do you think?
I think so as well IEO is a new development to ICO and what i see from the market is that those ICO that is shifting to IEO do pretty well when their coins are launch but will 100% of ICO move to IEO is still unknown though.
-
Some are in favor of IEOs because projects are carefully selected by exchanges and they (investors) do not have to worry about getting scammed. Some are not in favor because it is becoming more centralized now where only bigger investors gets a chance to participate.
As someone who does not have a capital close to a "whale", I would still prefer ICOs as it provides more chance for smaller investors to participate. And I think there are many who share a similar opinion.
-
IEO has a chance to overtake ICO but it seems not very soon. There are many ICOs that always come regularly. It indicates that ICOs are still good ways to promote and sell tokens/coins. If ICO still can bring investors and be an effective way, I think it will continue and survive.
-
It is too early to conclude that IEO has good prospects for replacing it with ICO. It is unlikely that the stock exchanges have the ability to completely filter out fraudsters in this kind of activity. It seems to me that government regulation of ICO activities will be the best way out; such regulation can almost completely rid ICO projects of fraudsters and effectively solve any issues that will arise in the future. The exchanges do not have the necessary powers and opportunities for such regulation.
-
For me IEO is an Innovation,the uplifting solution from previous ICO exit scams its quite safer than ICO for sure in terms of the security of the raised funds from IEO since exchange is acting like a escrow between the investors and the team who own the platform. But the concern about IEO is the reputation of the exchange who run and offered the IEO services.