Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum

Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Stuart on April 10, 2019, 11:16:24 PM

Title: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Stuart on April 10, 2019, 11:16:24 PM
The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: gotbounty on April 10, 2019, 11:36:45 PM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: UNIVERSE on April 14, 2019, 11:57:35 PM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.

Agree with your answer, bro. IEO provide safety and investors are interested in this. There some IEO that are just sold out only in a few minutes. Actually, I am surprised with it, but it is real. People seem to be interested because the IEOs are held in top exchanges.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: laughingburger on April 15, 2019, 03:58:35 AM
The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.

I will support ICO from a bounty hunter point of view, if the market is slowly shifting to IEO what i see is that bounty hunters will slowly lose their bounty jobs. However i am quite sre that if more and more ICO get successful through IEO we will see more ICO folow this plan instead.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: trauchot on April 15, 2019, 08:33:44 AM
I think that so far it is not worth worrying about this, many companies are still conducting ICOs and using bounty hunters to promote theirs companies, but when all companies will switch to IEO, then we will most likely will have problems.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: juv3ntus1 on April 15, 2019, 09:08:04 AM
I like more the Initial Exchange Offering because if you invest in IEO project you are sure the exchange will list that coin and the team will not finish the money and shut down the project and you will have a token who will worth nothing.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: MVT$ on April 15, 2019, 09:37:35 AM
If you are worried about ICOs getting less because of these IEOs, there are only a few who makes it to bigger exchanges. Many IEOs on smaller exchanges are still running bounties. I've also seen some post ICO bounty campaigns. Don't stress. 
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: aiviaa485 on April 15, 2019, 09:49:15 AM
Maybe ICO was designed for the lower class community.
Then the IEO is for other people who have a lot of assets.

Maybe this is in my opinion, and definitely very different from the others.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: zilzylian on April 15, 2019, 10:55:03 AM
IEO is a new thing where existing coins will run the sale of their tokens through crypto exchange, if this happens I think there will be lots of discounts and airdrops there, I as a bounty hunter don't worry about this, because we can also invest there.
Developers will need Bounty Hunter to promote their products to the wider community
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: toheed2x on April 15, 2019, 11:39:21 AM
yes its good for new projects and exchanges but not good for bounty participants because there is no need of advertisement for starting campaigns if you direct started IEO  :-\
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: VladEx on April 15, 2019, 11:53:22 AM
Right now bounty hunters rare get a good profit so maybe we need some changes and moving to IEO is a good idea
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Alcor on April 15, 2019, 07:31:24 PM
The Binance exchange is the most popular in IEO projects. However, I met on this forum a figure that out of the 60 IEO projects that were offered to this exchange, the exchange left only four, and the rest were rejected. Therefore, the remaining 56 or began to turn to less popular exchanges, or will collect funds in the ICO format.
We see that if IEO projects become further popular, then bounty hunters may lose their jobs.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Bobcrypto on April 15, 2019, 08:05:58 PM
And gradually, ICOs is becoming less attractive by the day because of what many investors, bounty hunters and other participants had experienced from ICOs. The issues of scam, faild promises, fraudulent activities etc, that has characterized ICOs has finally paved the way for IEOs.
I think if this trend continues, bounty hunter may be saying good by to ICOs jobs/promotions .
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: khufuking on April 15, 2019, 08:39:37 PM
IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, think about it that way, why would they will need campaign if they can sell their tokens super fast on any exchange threw IEO without the need to bother with Bounty campaign and all the hassle come with it.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: indexx on April 15, 2019, 11:16:49 PM
IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: diygirl on April 15, 2019, 11:29:05 PM
~snip~ I think if this trend continues, bounty hunter may be saying good by to ICOs jobs/promotions .

But I still see there are some projects that provide bounty programs even if they do IEOs. I think it is too early we conclude that bounty programs will be over. Personally, I think the bounty programs won't be over with the IEOs.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Jacky on April 15, 2019, 11:41:53 PM
IEO is actually not kind of stuff, I think that it is one of the other crowdfunding systems that is now being used for collecting the funds in to raise.
Well, IEO is very interesting because the coins are listed on exchange during the crowdfunding, so it will affect good both for investors and bounty hunters.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Fenix on April 16, 2019, 07:20:42 AM
IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.
So far, I see that there is no definite practice regarding the possibility of having bounty campaigns in IEO projects. Some IEO teams do not provide for them and quickly sell their tokens, others try to keep the old campaign system bounty. It seems to me that the campaign bounty when distributing new tokens need to be saved. So far, only one of the best projects is quickly completing the fundraising campaign, but the bulk of them will still need to advertise their projects, regardless of the format in which they will be conducted.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Ghozrd on April 16, 2019, 12:49:41 PM
I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, I think this is the latest investment we can do by buying new coins that already have good sales at ICO, I pay attention to coins or tokens those who run the IEO have a good future, ICO and IEO have differences, namely the IEO collects funds faster than investors in just seconds while the ICO takes a long time.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: masterrex on April 16, 2019, 01:11:35 PM
The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.
Honestly I participated already with the numerous ICO wayback 2017-2018 respectively But due to my Bad experience in my previous ICO investing journey im getting scam 2 times, thats why im keeping away in ICO at the moment. But I wish to participate in IEO But i was not able to bought tokens, first on Binance, second on Kucoin, all was failed due to large number of participants the tokens was sold like a hotcake.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Bit on April 16, 2019, 02:18:09 PM
I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, ~snip~

I saw they reached more than softcap, most of them could reach hardcap. I ever heard that on Bittrex, all tokens are sold out only in several minutes. It is very surprising and investors seem very enthusiastic to buy. 
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Bobcrypto on April 16, 2019, 03:15:22 PM
IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.

Yes, the spreading of information by the community through word from persons or group is vital to the popularity and awareness of these projects. I think as time goe on there may be additional bounty campaign to enhance the IEOs.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Psynthax on April 16, 2019, 04:01:25 PM
ICO and IEO is a good way to crowdfund ofcourse, ICO especially is already tested by the whole community since years ago, though the community have the public secret that ICO sometimes is messed up, often leaving their investors in a grey area full of uncertainty. IEO in the other hand is provided by a popular exchange to facilitate any new project that will be coming up with a new idea. By that we could see that IEO could be more legit than ICO itself however there's still some risks involved whether the project will follow the roadmap or delivering what they promise.

However, as you can see it's always better to seek for something with more certainty, with existing product and not just empty handed but with plenty of proof like VEIL and that's why it's my favorite.

VEIL is basically integrating best-in-class anonymity technologies to become the first cryptocurrency that provides uncompromising, always-on privacy. they already have a crystal clear vision and product. Also there's no kind of BS overfunded crowdfunding nor premine and what's even more promising is the fact that it's already traded exchanges with quite of the volume

If I were to choose I'd certainly go with the legit ones instead of putting money into something like IEO and ICO like what most of smart people do, heck even millionaire is putting their money in a project that already starts to surface not just an idea right? so that's my 2 cents I guess that's the best thing I could think.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: tonymillions84 on April 23, 2019, 11:07:58 PM
that is exactly what everyone needs. the scam involved in cryptocurrency was becoming a menace. it was about to drive investors out of this new technology. with IEO, investors are sure that projects will definitely hit exchanges. one good benefits.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Legio on April 24, 2019, 10:49:43 AM
IEO is increasingly popular, this method attracts investors because it is safer and has a lower risk of scam compared to ICO. But ICO used to be and more familiar to investors, maybe later there will be a big shift of choice from ICO to IEO.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: shadow.bishop on April 24, 2019, 08:31:55 PM
I can say IEO took ICO's throne. There are so many IEO will sale next days also.

Upcoming IEOs in April 2019. Detail ;"https://icodrops.com/category/upcoming-ico/"
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Rafiq on April 27, 2019, 06:46:08 PM
IEO is increasingly popular, this method attracts investors because it is safer and has a lower risk of scam compared to ICO. But ICO used to be and more familiar to investors, maybe later there will be a big shift of choice from ICO to IEO.
I agree with your opinion. Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) is better then Initial Coin Offering (ICO) and it is safety for investors. But I think it is bad for bounty hunters. In future bounty hunters will lose their bounty jobs.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Leonardo on April 27, 2019, 07:21:31 PM
IEOs was hot at its early days but it will soon loose its steam. People are greedy. They want 8x or 10x profit. Meanwhile, exchanges can not always cut their flesh to feed the greediness.

[...] But I think it is bad for bounty hunters. In future bounty hunters will lose their bounty jobs.
Not really, there're still good traditional ICOs, it's just they're harder to found. Besides, there're always opportunities for bounty doers, for example IoTeX signature campaign that I'm wearing ;)
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: AllSii on April 27, 2019, 09:18:42 PM
I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, I think this is the latest investment we can do by buying new coins that already have good sales at ICO, I pay attention to coins or tokens those who run the IEO have a good future, ICO and IEO have differences, namely the IEO collects funds faster than investors in just seconds while the ICO takes a long time.
Besides the fact that IEO attracts investors' money, it allows you to automatically get a listing on the exchange.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: GREENch85 on April 27, 2019, 10:06:15 PM
I heard from several people that it is very difficult to become a lucky person who managed to buy tokens during the IEO. All purchases are made using bots in seconds. Of course we are talking about top projects.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: 88percent on April 27, 2019, 11:49:12 PM
IEOs becomes popular and there are many investors interested in this token sale type. But I think ICO is also keeping its existence. But from the enthusiastic from people, IEO is better for now.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: atithisha on April 29, 2019, 01:05:00 PM

Did you have an idea to launch initial exchange offering? Get the assistance from icoclone or ping in telegram: coinzclone
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: ArtCrypt on April 29, 2019, 03:42:48 PM
Of course the second method of fundraising (IEO) is very popular and in demand, because this method guarantees listing for this token on the exchange  Now there are few projects that use this method. To tell the truth ICO is already dead. It is past and not important at the moment.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Moykoy on April 29, 2019, 03:51:06 PM
The ICO project is now less interested by bounty hunters. And now there is a new project with the IEO label. Now the bounty hunters are flocking to the IEO project because here is more promising than at the ICO.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Malibu on April 29, 2019, 04:18:33 PM
At the moment, the IEO certainly wins against the ICO. Now all investors in IEO. But if you are a big investor, then IEO will not suit you. I think life IEO not long
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Cutter Cute on April 29, 2019, 04:39:30 PM
The most important thing here is, as long as there are new coins and registered in exchange, I think it will have many benefits for investors because they avoid fraud, my concern is that when the new project runs the IEO and then the developers just leave it, detrimental to investors and registered exchanges, but with a good level of security from the exchange team, they will choose coins and look well before carrying out the IEO.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: 88percent on April 29, 2019, 06:01:16 PM
At the moment, the IEO certainly wins against the ICO. Now all investors in IEO. But if you are a big investor, then IEO will not suit you. I think life IEO not long

I am interested in your opinion, but what do you suggest exactly? Well, I also think IEO will become like ICO. When there are many exchanges play manipulation in IEOs, the popularity of IEOs will be decreasing like ICOs as well.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Mikam on April 30, 2019, 04:50:48 PM
Many prize hunters have left the ICO. They flock to the IEO. According to them, the IEO project is clearer and more promising. While the ICO project has more scammers.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: densuj on May 01, 2019, 06:13:20 AM
At the moment, the IEO certainly wins against the ICO. Now all investors in IEO. But if you are a big investor, then IEO will not suit you. I think life IEO not long

I am interested in your opinion, but what do you suggest exactly? Well, I also think IEO will become like ICO. When there are many exchanges play manipulation in IEOs, the popularity of IEOs will be decreasing like ICOs as well.
Well manipulations of price, ICOs scam projects, low the price of token and many more something bad related with ICOs and IEOs is part of the risk losing money in cryptocurrencies. We have knew there were many ICOs failed in the projects but does not mean in the IEOs the projects will be successfull for example it is bad news about the IEOs https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin so if we want make investment in the ICOs or IEOs make sure we have know everything related with the projects, before we make investment our money it is very wise as an investors in cryptocurrencies projects.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: cybersoft on May 01, 2019, 07:47:43 AM
ICOs are full of scams nowadays that is why they invented the new form of crowdfunding called IEO to make more better and professional which also provides a safer ground for investors and venture capitals alike. For me, I support the new form of crowdfunding as it reduces scams and will also help in securing people investments in a better way. for bounty future, well I don't give a damn :)
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: wizard on May 01, 2019, 10:06:41 AM
We can already confidently say that the ico time is over. Investors confidence in ICO no longer exists
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: GREENch85 on May 01, 2019, 01:43:26 PM
Fundraising project Ocean Protocol on Bittrex Launchpad has been very "sluggish". Most likely, people lost interest in Bittrex Launchpad after the failed tokensale Raid (project turned out to be a Scam and IEO was canceled)
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: vanjava on May 01, 2019, 05:13:19 PM
The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.

in my opinion the IEO is a tough competitor for the ICO because many IEOs are popping up now along with the ICO which continues to be less attractive to investors and also many ICOs that are scam. for now the IEO is more profitable than ICO.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Spc on May 01, 2019, 05:21:52 PM
Many bounty hunters are turning to the IEO. Because they feel more fortunate to be in the IEO. While the ICO is still labeled as a gift full of fraud.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: shadow.bishop on May 01, 2019, 07:32:34 PM
Current and ATH ROI in USD of IEOs recently listed on exchanges.

https://icodrops.com/ico-stats/
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: @Royale on May 02, 2019, 01:13:42 AM
IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.

I beg to disagree with you Sir. I actually think IEO will eventually kill bounty hunters.
IEO's only requires three primary participants: crypto exchanges, projects and INVESTORS. The respective crypto exchange performs the technical analysis of the projects, the credibility of the token issuer and the potential of the token. Thus, projects can be assured of a more legitimized and better token sale. However, the crypto tokens of startups aren’t available to open public. Only the stable customers of the respective crypto exchange can participate in the IEO event. For others[investors] willing to participate in the token sale, they need to create an account with the exchange hosting the IEO.
I really do not see any room in IEO for bounty hunters.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: MuTu on May 08, 2019, 03:17:49 PM
ICO fundraising methods have been around for a long time and have survived to this day, but ICO is very risky and has many scams. The IEO method is increasingly popular for investors and this method is considered safer and less risky, but both ICO and IEO have their own advantages and disadvantages.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Laslo on May 08, 2019, 03:55:50 PM
The direct interest of the exchange in the profit from IEO casts doubt on the reliability of the reputational risk check, which means the safety and profitability of investors' investments is at risk of complete loss :(
But, experts say that IEO is the result of an evolutionary development of the market that solves the issues of unsystematic investor risks (hacker attacks, scamming) and reduces the costs of start-up organizers.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Zurcemozz on May 08, 2019, 03:59:03 PM
I think i will choose ICO as a bounty hunter, just like what other said, there is a chance that IEO will kill the bounty hunters., But also ICO is very risky and there are many people who uses it as a scam.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Coin63@ on May 08, 2019, 11:46:52 PM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.
Initial exchange offering shortly named IEO, is more profitable and safer than initial coin offering short ico... Nowadays IEO is always accepted.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: densuj on May 09, 2019, 03:52:14 AM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.
Initial exchange offering shortly named IEO, is more profitable and safer than initial coin offering short ico... Nowadays IEO is always accepted.
No you are wrong IEOs and ICOs they are high risk investment related with cryptocurrencies, there are no free risk of investment in IEOs or ICOs projects if you don't know anything about the projects be built on it. I have bad news for the IEOs become scam projects https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is mean IEOs does not mean profitable than ICOs all of them can be failure if you don't know anything about the projects.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Ghozrd on May 09, 2019, 04:23:25 AM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.
Initial exchange offering shortly named IEO, is more profitable and safer than initial coin offering short ico... Nowadays IEO is always accepted.
No you are wrong IEOs and ICOs they are high risk investment related with cryptocurrencies, there are no free risk of investment in IEOs or ICOs projects if you don't know anything about the projects be built on it. I have bad news for the IEOs become scam projects https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is mean IEOs does not mean profitable than ICOs all of them can be failure if you don't know anything about the projects.
I think big investors already understand what will happen, the IEO does promise because the token is listed on the stock, but in the end, fraud can still occur without us knowing it and I always advise all my friends to see the team details from the project developers before investing.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: charanpreet singh on May 09, 2019, 11:19:28 AM
I assume that so far it isn't really worth stressful about this, many businesses are nonetheless carrying out ICOs and the usage of bounty hunters to promote theirs companies, however whilst all companies will switch to IEO, then we are able to most in all likelihood may have issues.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Coltpython on May 09, 2019, 12:26:38 PM
IEOs are just slight upgrade to ICOs. Why IEOs are better is that the projects in question sell their tokens and list on the exchange once the sales are over. To do this they will also need to undergo KYC processes and other checks to verify their authenticity. In other words, you have less chances of getting scammed via IEOs
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: densuj on May 10, 2019, 02:33:34 AM
For now, Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) should be better than ICO. IEO provides a safer way for investors to put their money on crypto projects. Moreover, IEO is held on big exchanges, it can guarantee investors for the quality place for token listing.
Initial exchange offering shortly named IEO, is more profitable and safer than initial coin offering short ico... Nowadays IEO is always accepted.
No you are wrong IEOs and ICOs they are high risk investment related with cryptocurrencies, there are no free risk of investment in IEOs or ICOs projects if you don't know anything about the projects be built on it. I have bad news for the IEOs become scam projects https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is mean IEOs does not mean profitable than ICOs all of them can be failure if you don't know anything about the projects.
I think big investors already understand what will happen, the IEO does promise because the token is listed on the stock, but in the end, fraud can still occur without us knowing it and I always advise all my friends to see the team details from the project developers before investing.
I agree with your advise to all of your friends to see the team of projects before investment into them, i will add other factors which the IEOs projects must have real of products although it is just beta products, the IEOs must have the company behind of the projects because however ICOs and IEOs basically they are like IPO on the stocks of market and the last always increase financial intelegent in cryptocurrencies space before making investment in cryptocurrencies. It is more better than any other method of analysis on cryptocurrencies projects.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: 88percent on May 10, 2019, 10:41:44 PM
~snip~ I really do not see any room in IEO for bounty hunters.

In fact, there are still many IEO projects that provide bounties. Do you realize it? I still see many bounties made by IEO projects. I don't try to support Mr. indexx , but it is what I see for now.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: alltalk on May 11, 2019, 04:51:01 PM
Of course, IEO will give impacts to crypto space. I see investors have high interest to join since it provides better security. I think IEO is a bit better than ICO for now. But I don't know what will happen in the next few months.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: Paha87 on May 12, 2019, 05:48:15 AM
For the ICO we are more accustomed, and IEO is all new and has a lot of disadvantages and of course advantages. I do not see the point of betting on this or that form of advertising and selling coins, I am more accustomed to ICO, investors have time to study the project, communicate with the management and make a choice for investment, which can not be said about instant sales at IEO!!
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: jet on May 12, 2019, 12:11:45 PM
for sure it affect to bounty hunters but whether good or bad. only time can tell! for me, projects are making bounty to create community and it expecting less for an investors.. hunters are task to reach out more people in the crypto world.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: andrewBud on May 12, 2019, 11:35:53 PM

The problem is that for IEO on exchanges, exchanges require compliance with certain conditions, plus a considerable amount of money.  IEO service costs money.  Therefore, ICO will remain in one form or another - developers need money to organize IEO.
Title: Re: ICO vs IEO.
Post by: masterrex on May 13, 2019, 05:41:50 AM
The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.
For me It doesnt matter if good or Bad for Bounty hunters, since crypto is not revolve on us the more important for me was the funds are safe and those scumbags are not able to robbed the investors in broad daylight.