Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: gunhell16 on October 15, 2020, 11:00:22 AM
-
(https://i.ibb.co/nm2GkYg/Screenshot-5.png) (https://ibb.co/h956847)
I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?
-
(https://i.ibb.co/nm2GkYg/Screenshot-5.png) (https://ibb.co/h956847)
I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?
Well, you can't really blame Bounty detective as this a compensation for there hunters, for their failed bounties that weren't successful. This fund is from there own pocket and not the usual way of promoting another project.
If you check again, the space is very limited to 40 altcointalk and Bitcointalk, the last time I checked, the signature participants slots were just 30/30 but I can see it has been increased to 40/40.
There are other signature campaign you can join like TON though there are no available space for now.
-
I think what is unfair is the late announcement of limiting the participants. Regarding to $5,000 bounty pool, it is the hunter who will decide to join or not. At the first place they know that it is only $5,000. To participate is not a compulsory but it is individual decision.
-
Actually i missed the best signature campaign Free TON because of bounty detective Campaigns. I already participated in $5000 dollar with of campaign. I think it is worth of time and effort. Please bounty detective team reconsider your campaign time. Campaign time should 2 weeks maximum. If I Participated in Twitter campaign with below 10k members, then I would get only 2 dollar with 6 weeks hardworking.
-
(https://i.ibb.co/nm2GkYg/Screenshot-5.png) (https://ibb.co/h956847)
I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?
The fact that this payment for the campaign comes from the pocket of the bounty manager is actually enough to consider it as fair. This is sure than the unrealistic campaign offering big amount of allocation but nothing is true at the end of the day.
-
Bounty detective is the owner of the campaign, they can make the rules as they want. For me, it is fair once they limit the number of participants because of the number of rewards isn't very high. You mustn't blame Bounty Detective because they may have certain goals for the campaign. We should support them, at least they allow us to join.
-
It is fair, Bitcoin detective wants to make the participants get a good amount of the rewards. So, they just limit the number of participants. In this case, we must appreciate Bounty Detective they have the intention to give a good amount of money (reward) to the participants of the current bounty.
-
I think it's fair if the bounty project limits the number of participants. Because this of course will be related to the distribution later. Who is fast then he can. Don't bother. If you are really interested in this $ 5,000 bounty, it's better to register immediately before the quota is full.
-
I think it's fair if the bounty project limits the number of participants. Because this of course will be related to the distribution later. Who is fast then he can. Don't bother. If you are really interested in this $ 5,000 bounty, it's better to register immediately before the quota is full.
Indeed, when there is an opportunity like that, you should be able to take advantage of it immediately to register before they close the registration and I think the gifts they give are quite a lot because during a pandemic like this it is difficult to get money.
-
I guess this is Bounty Detective special bounty for 6 weeks with $5k bounty pool. The amount of $5,000 is fair enough if BNB coin will increase which I think the mindset of Bounty Detective. Actually, BNB is potential and very possible to increase anytime. What I worry is when BNB coin will increase during the campaign and the bounty pool remains the same.
-
I think it's fair or unfair from the point of view of each, But I think the bountydetective has given its best as a reward for a failed project to the community. Participants have no compulsion to join. so the choice is yours
-
indeed allocation bounty detective for their campaigns only about $ 5,000 in coin binance, of course, this is only the allocation of entertainment for the bounty hunter to be able to trust the bounty detective for bounties until now there are many who do not pay participants to bounty detective create campaigns to make a name they are better.
-
Since this is a compensation for those who were affected by the failed bounties. Anyone who join made a choice to
-
First I heard about this project from the Telegram Bounty Group Detectiv I thought the prize allocation was 5000 BNB. But I was wrong because the truth was BNB worth $ 5000. And in my opinion, it is very small, especially since Detectiv's Bounty has a large community, every Bounty managed by it must have many participants.
-
(https://i.ibb.co/nm2GkYg/Screenshot-5.png) (https://ibb.co/h956847)
I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?
I think it depends on the participants, to decide whether its "fair or unfair" At first everyone should aware that before you can join in the $5000 worth Bounty Detective sponsored campaign you must fulfil the requirements 1. you should one of the participants in the previous "dropped"campaigns, Like, KingCasino, ClipX, Cerviero, etc, to be qualified in the campaign, In "first come first serve basis" While the Signature campaign is just limited to 80 participants, 40 for AltcoinsTalk and 40 for BitcoinTalk users, same as for Twitter, Video, and Article/Blog, which is also limited in slot. IMO, $5000 worth of Bounty pool is not that big, But at least it was paid directly in $BNB which is already liquid.
-
fair, not fair actually back to each individual, why because we make the choice to join, if you feel that you are not commensurate with the final result, yes you can leave the bounty, without having to sue a BM by considering a larger allocation, maybe the allocation is already stipulated from the dev's side
-
It's not fair, but we can't do anything, if you think it's not suited for you, don't join, sadly this is how it works.
-
First I heard about this project from the Telegram Bounty Group Detectiv I thought the prize allocation was 5000 BNB. But I was wrong because the truth was BNB worth $ 5000. And in my opinion, it is very small, especially since Detectiv's Bounty has a large community, every Bounty managed by it must have many participants.
If you might have noticed, this is not an ICO at all, there is no advertisement for a new project and a new token. On his own initiative, the bounty detective distributes to bounty hunters Binance exchange tokens, which have a high price and high popularity among participants in the cryptocurrency market. Moreover, they did the right thing by limiting the number of participants in bounty campaigns. I would also try to join if I had the opportunity. However, I'm involved in another signature campaign.
-
In the first place, thanks to all who gave their side and opinion on this topic that I created, this topic was not made to insult Bounty detective neither I am against it of course not! I am just stating the fact, that the allocation literally for the bounty pool was really too small for each participant who will join with it compared to the task they need to comply, in short, the effort is not worth for the rewards they will receive since it came from the pocket itself of the bounty detective management. I hope you get my point and I respect your side also since We are in the forum where we can express our own opinion here. But anyway thanks again to everyone.
-
Fair because bounty detective gives budget from their own fund.
-
In my opinion, if indeed limiting the number of participants to take part in the bounty is legal. However, as much as possible to be fair is to limit who quickly he can. Don't even limit or require a high rank to be accepted. Because it's not fair for those who have registered first but low rank.
-
For regular ICO bounty campaigns, such a small pool would most likely be unfair. However, in this case, the ICO is not carried out. Here, we can say, a separate action is being held, which is dedicated to a specific event. Bounty detectives are holding their event and it is very commendable. In my eyes, their authority has only grown because of this.
-
If based on other campaigns the bounty you mentioned is unfair, because normally someone with a high rank will be paid 120 usd in one month,
but because the number of campaigns now does not match the number of bounty hunters, which causes bounty hunters to be forced to join the campaign even though the prize allocation is small.
-
Fairly speaking and not about a $ 5000 bounty limiting the number of participants. In my opinion this is reasonable because the bounty manager indirectly thinks of the participants who take part in the bounty, try to imagine if the participants are not limited by a small bounty allocation, it will be very disappointing if the bounty has been completed and the prizes received are not proportional to the time they spend.
-
I will say it is unfair because the announcement is coming late, it should have been there right from the beginning of the campaign. I feel many would have join other campaign instead of raising their hope high for the campaign. May be the manager should always have a concrete agreement with dev and team before announcing a campaign.
-
(https://i.ibb.co/nm2GkYg/Screenshot-5.png) (https://ibb.co/h956847)
I just want to get others to the opinion on this matter, Because for me this 5000$ bounty pool is really not enough
and very unfair for the high-ranking members here in the forum. What do you think guys? Do you think this is really fair
or not?
Bounty hunting this days is not about what it is worth; but a reality of what it is all about. 5000$ definitely looks small, but when you consider that signature and twitter campaigns are capped then you see that you do not have to worry much. Just do your bits or avoid thhe bounty.
-
A few years ago, the reward pool in bounty companies was hundreds of thousands of dollars, and this was practically the norm. It was also easier for participants in this and other similar forums because at first there were no bounty campaigns on social networks, but only signature campaigns. The influx of such a mass of participants who were ready to advertise crypto projects on social networks for much less reward has led to the current poor earnings for bounty hunters. I don't like it either, but there's nothing you can do about it. Sometimes I refuse to participate in signature campaigns and other campaigns due to a too small pool. Especially if the projects look suspicious.