Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Cryptocurrency Ecosystem => Crypto Wallets => Topic started by: dkbit98 on January 01, 2024, 12:22:34 PM
-
Open source software is made freely and available for possible modification and redistribution by anyone.
Bitcoin is open source and I think that Hardware wallets should also be Open Source so that everyone can check and verify their code.
Not all wallets are open source, and who knows what code they have and if someone can post firmware update with big bug or malicious code.
Hardware wallets with Open Source firmware:
- Trezor One; model T; Safe 3; Safe 5 (https://github.com/trezor) c r
- Bitbox* r (https://github.com/digitalbitbox)
- Passport**; Passport Prime (https://github.com/Foundation-Devices) c r
- Jade (https://github.com/Blockstream/Jade)
- Jade Plus (https://blockstream.com/jade/jade-plus/)
- Satochip (https://github.com/Toporin)
- Keepkey* (https://github.com/keepkey) r
- BitHD* (https://github.com/bithd)
- Prokey* (https://github.com/prokey-io)
- OneKey Classic*; Mini, Touch (https://github.com/OneKeyHQ)
- HyperMate (https://github.com/hyperpayorg/hardwallet)
- Cypherock X1 (https://www.cypherock.com/)
- Hito (pre-sale) (https://hito.xyz/)
- Bitlox (https://github.com/bitlox)
- Keystone3 (https://github.com/KeystoneHQ)
- BitKey (https://github.com/proto-at-block/bitkey)
- Portal (https://github.com/TwentyTwoHW)
- Cardware (https://https://cardwarewallet.com/)
Coolwallet Pro (https://github.com/CoolBitX-Technology/coolwallet-pro-se), Coldcard (https://github.com/Coldcard) and Safepal X1 (https://github.com/SafePalWallet/safepal-x1) devices are source available, NOT open source.
* based on modified Trezor code
** based on ColdCard code
c open source hardware certified by OSHWA (https://certification.oshwa.org/)
r firmware reproduced by walletscrutiny (https://walletscrutiny.com/?verdict=reproducible&platform=hardware) or bitcoinbinary (https://bitcoinbinary.org/).
DIY Open Source Hardware wallets (signing devices) (only for advanced users):
- Jade DIY Wallet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454770)
- Bowser DIY Wallet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5291333.0) r
- Trezor DIY Wallet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259912.0)
- PiTrezor DIY Wallet r (https://www.pitrezor.com/2018/02/pitrezor-homemade-trezor-bitcoin-wallet.html)
- Specter DIY Wallet r (https://specter.solutions/#diy)
- SeedSigner DIY Wallet sd (https://github.com/SeedSigner)
- XmrSigner DIY Wallet sd (https://github.com/xmrsigner)
- Krux DIY Wallet sd (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350905.0) r
sd Signing Device without permanent storage.
You can check and verify if someone managed to reproduce firmware for this hardware wallets using two websites walletscrutiny (https://walletscrutiny.com/?verdict=reproducible&platform=hardware) and bitcoinbinary (https://bitcoinbinary.org/).
Open Source can also have bugs, and code should be verified and checked before installing.
If anyone knows any other open source hardware wallet please post it here so I can update my list and make corrections.
-
Open Source can also have bugs, and code should be verified and checked before installing.
that's why it's recommended since one can tell if there exist a bug when properly verified and corrections can be made.
The list must be well researched, you mentioned most, including some I am not familiar with. If am going to add then
Coldcard
Ledger but currently located a vulnerability they working on.
Safepal X1, S1 and the pro
Etc
You mentioned foundation passport is using Coldcard old code am curious why you didn't add Coldcard to your list.
-
You mentioned foundation passport is using Coldcard old code am curious why you didn't add Coldcard to your list.
I didn't add coldcard wallet because they are not open source wallet anymore, and they sadly have mentally unstable owner nvk.
Coldcard decided to change license to common clause, and that is not open source license, they even false advertised for months:
https://commonsclause.com
-
Wow i never knew.is there any substantial benefits in changing to common clause.they should be informed that most customers use their products because its open source.
Not a user of any hardware wallet for now since i don't really think i have enough Bitcoin to deserve it, only have theoretical knowledge about hardware wallets.
-
The list is more than what I was expecting. I think this thread needs to be pinned.
Not a user of any hardware wallet for now since i don't really think i have enough Bitcoin to deserve it, only have theoretical knowledge about hardware wallets.
Do not be mistaken. Hardware wallets also support altcoins. Even Trezor, which became widely known as the top HW for BTC, can now accept ETH, DOGE, LTC, and other cryptos. You can visit their website to check which wallet is compatible.
-
Do not be mistaken. Hardware wallets also support altcoins. Even Trezor, which became widely known as the top HW for BTC, can now accept ETH, DOGE, LTC, and other cryptos. You can visit their website to check which wallet is compatible.
Yes, many hardware wallets support multiple cryptocurrencies. These wallets are designed to be versatile and compatible with various coins and tokens. Popular hardware wallets such as Ledger andTrezor, for example, have the capability to store a wide range of cryptocurrencies. Just as @ZedoX have said, it's important to check the list of supported cryptocurrencies on the official website of the wallet provider.
-
Not a user of any hardware wallet for now since i don't really think i have enough Bitcoin to deserve it, only have theoretical knowledge about hardware wallets.
I have heard people say this only to find out that they own a very good amount in BTC, but still do not think it is worth getting a hardware wallet for, i think for someone with > $1k worth of BTC, it may be a good idea to get yourself a hardware wallet.
It may be worth mentioning that you can also set up an airgapped wallet if you don't want to spend money on a hardware wallet, if you know what you are doing and do everything right, it is as safe as a hardware wallet.
-
I have heard people say this only to find out that they own a very good amount in BTC, but still do not think it is worth getting a hardware wallet for, i think for someone with > $1k worth of BTC, it may be a good idea to get yourself a hardware wallet.
In my opinion there is no universal amount. $1k might not seem a lot to someone in the US, but a real fortune to someone in a third world country, for example.
I think that as long as you can't afford to lose your btc without it having real consequences on your personal life, you need to have either a hardware wallet or a clean airgapped computer, even if it is only $500 for example.
I'm increasingly curious about pitrezor. I think I'll try to make one for myself, just to see how it goes. It looks super easy to do btw
-
- Coolwallet Pro SE (? source-available) (https://github.com/CoolBitX-Technology/coolwallet-pro-se)
It's definitely only source-available since the license explicitly mention it's only allowed for non-commercial use which doesn't meet open source definition.
I have heard people say this only to find out that they own a very good amount in BTC, but still do not think it is worth getting a hardware wallet for, i think for someone with > $1k worth of BTC, it may be a good idea to get yourself a hardware wallet.
In my opinion there is no universal amount. $1k might not seem a lot to someone in the US, but a real fortune to someone in a third world country, for example.
I think that as long as you can't afford to lose your btc without it having real consequences on your personal life, you need to have either a hardware wallet or a clean airgapped computer, even if it is only $500 for example.
And i'd go as far as saying it's still worth it even if total value of your coin is only slightly higher than price of the hardware wallet itself.
-
Trezor Safe 5 is now added on the list of Open Source hardware wallets.
This device is similar like Trezor Safe 3, it is using the same secure element, and it only has some improvements with size of touchscreen.
It is more expensive than previous device and it can be purchased for $169.
https://trezor.io/trezor-safe-5
-
I just saw this thread lmao, good list of as always. This list proves how people trusts open source projects, even though making their product open source has a negative effect on the business it self like getting copied or whatnot but look at it. Trezor always amazes me with their products and most people chooses this kind over closed source wallets, i can see them still in the market in 10 years unlike those closed source one.
-
I just saw this thread lmao, good list of as always. This list proves how people trusts open source projects, even though making their product open source has a negative effect on the business it self like getting copied or whatnot but look at it. Trezor always amazes me with their products and most people chooses this kind over closed source wallets, i can see them still in the market in 10 years unlike those closed source one.
There is no negative effect for Trezor or any other open source hardware wallet projects.
It would be the same as saying that it is negative that Bitcoin is open source because we have so many forked coins, but nothing was lost for Bitcoin.
In fact hardware wallets forking code can only contribute imroving it and finding more hidden bugs in code.
-
I just saw this thread lmao, good list of as always. This list proves how people trusts open source projects, even though making their product open source has a negative effect on the business it self like getting copied or whatnot but look at it. Trezor always amazes me with their products and most people chooses this kind over closed source wallets, i can see them still in the market in 10 years unlike those closed source one.
There is no negative effect for Trezor or any other open source hardware wallet projects.
It would be the same as saying that it is negative that Bitcoin is open source because we have so many forked coins, but nothing was lost for Bitcoin.
In fact hardware wallets forking code can only contribute imroving it and finding more hidden bugs in code.
I thought PX-Z is a good poster but this post made me think otherwise. Or should I say that this is how some developers think? But as they think like this, are there still no competition? Coinomi which was a very good open source wallet before changed to close source and the wallet went bad. Trustwallet which is close source, is it the best wallet or the only wallet people are using? That is not possible. Trezor, passport and other hardware wallets that are open source are still making money. Even if all wallets are close source, there will still be competition.
-
There is no negative effect for Trezor or any other open source hardware wallet projects.
It would be the same as saying that it is negative that Bitcoin is open source because we have so many forked coins, but nothing was lost for Bitcoin.
In fact hardware wallets forking code can only contribute improving it and finding more hidden bugs in code.
Talking about open source coins are totally different things. Trezor is on another level on HW products, aside from that its the very first HW wallet, the support from the community towards the company is overflowing. Trezor being as an open source project has nothing to lose, compared to new ones.
I thought PX-Z is a good poster but this post made me think otherwise. Or should I say that this is how some developers think? But as they think like this, are there still no competition? Coinomi which was a very good open source wallet before changed to close source and the wallet went bad. Trustwallet which is close source, is it the best wallet or the only wallet people are using? That is not possible. Trezor, passport and other hardware wallets that are open source are still making money. Even if all wallets are close source, there will still be competition.
Its more like in business side perspective, developers just do what their bosses wants. Closed source wallets are usually owned by a business while open source wallets are community driven and community-supported projects so they have nothing to lose. Regardless of the competition, business have so many things to protect and reconsider (codes being fork, intellectual property, app security related, etc.), weighing the potential risks and benefits that's why they remain closed sources.
The fear of being copied and losing control over their product often makes business hesitant to make their software/products open source.
Well, there are some who risks, exceptionally fund their marketing strategy and get extraordinary results.
-
Talking about open source coins are totally different things. Trezor is on another level on HW products, aside from that its the very first HW wallet, the support from the community towards the company is overflowing. Trezor being as an open source project has nothing to lose, compared to new ones.
I didn't notice any other open source hardware wallets losing anything just because they are open source, Keystone, BitBox and Jade are doing fine, same as Satochip.
Like I said before, they can only gain something and improve their code if someone else forks and discovered some new bug in code.
-
Talking about open source coins are totally different things. Trezor is on another level on HW products, aside from that its the very first HW wallet, the support from the community towards the company is overflowing. Trezor being as an open source project has nothing to lose, compared to new ones.
I didn't notice any other open source hardware wallets losing anything just because they are open source, Keystone, BitBox and Jade are doing fine, sam e as Satochip.
Like I said before, they can only gain something and improve their code if someone else forks and discovered some new bug in code.
Good to see that a thread like this was finally pinned here. I was actually waiting to see if admin would take a action like this. That's because a while back I actually suggested a board for open source wallets and some people though they seemed to buy the idea were also simultaneously of the opinion that we have way too many boards lying around the forum so I suggested a thread would be good too.
I think another thread for open source software wallets should also be created for wallets like ELECTRUM that are very popular and of course usually have a couple of questions from different users.
-
I think another thread for open source software wallets should also be created for wallets like ELECTRUM that are very popular and of course usually have a couple of questions from different users.
I already created a topic for Multicoin Open Source Wallets few months ago and it's not very active:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=318934
That is more than enough, since everyone knows about Electrum wallet as bitcoin only wallet, and there isn't many alternatives like Sparrow etc.
Please stay on topic here - Open Source Hardware Wallets.
-
Anyone who is familiar with DIY project SeedSigner knows this device can only be used for Bitcoin, that was the case until now.
With XmrSigner now you can your own Air-Gapped Monero Hardware Wallet, using the same SeedSigner device with flashed XmrSigner code.
Everything is released as open source, and even new enclosure design is released with .stl files ready for download for free.
(https://i.ibb.co/M2fLXD2/imgdfd216b3818b845b9994d8133efb50db.jpg)
https://github.com/xmrsigner
-
Anyone who is familiar with DIY project SeedSigner knows this device can only be used for Bitcoin, that was the case until now.
With XmrSigner now you can your own Air-Gapped Monero Hardware Wallet, using the same SeedSigner device with flashed XmrSigner code.
I didn't know about this project! It's really nice, we finally have a DIY open source air-gapped XMR hardware wallet! :D
I've got a few Pi Zeros lying around that aren't being used, so I'm going to try and make one for myself (probably a minimalistic version) .
-
I didn't know about this project! It's really nice, we finally have a DIY open source air-gapped XMR hardware wallet! :D
I've got a few Pi Zeros lying around that aren't being used, so I'm going to try and make one for myself (probably a minimalistic version) .
Yeah, it's great to see this project coming to life.
If you already have Rpi Zero than you only need to print the case, there are a bunch of .stl files available for free, you don't have to use the one I posted above.
Ggreat thing about it is that you can switch back to Seedsigner code for Bitcoin anytime you want.
-
List of Open Source devices is updated with new hardware wallet from Blockstream called Jade plus.
It has some improvements compared to standard Jade wallet, but it is also much more expensive.
I still couldn't find links released on their github page, so I am posting website link for now:
(https://i.ibb.co/BzDStJ3/imgb5bb426574f88f268c39c6685d160374.jpg)
https://blockstream.com/jade/jade-plus/
-
After Jade Plus, list is updated with another new source devices, Passport Prime.
Passport Prime is not only a hardware wallet since it has many additional features, but I still decided to include it and wait to see the official release.
I think this is going to be interesting device when it comes in the market, something like all-in-one device.
(https://i.ibb.co/syhCCWq/img1617c2fbc0f4fd4cc8f19f71554cd92b.jpg)
https://foundation.xyz/buy-passport-prime/
-
There is a new hardware wallet in town, and it's called Cardware.
Cardware can be purchased form $77, it is AirGapped only dvice, that is using QR code scanning, and it has CC EAL6+ certification secure element.
There is web app used for connecting with Cardware, but I would prefer to have support for other software wallets.
They claim source code is available but I can't find their github page so I will add them in list only after confiormation.
(https://i.ibb.co/v6Mhr1k6/qIcVD.png)
Website: https://cardwarewallet.com/
Blog: https://www.cardwarewallet.com/blog
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Cardwarewallet
Twitter: https://x.com/cardwarewallet
Telegram: https://t.me/cardwarewallet
Discord: https://discord.gg/dgDXR85CXB
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cardware-wallet
Cardware Documentation:
Cardware Github: https://github.com/cardware-wallet
Shop - BTC Only Device: https://www.cardwarewallet.com/btcproducts
Get Started: https://cardwarewallet.com/start
Cardware Wallet docs: https://docs.cardwarewallet.com
NPM Documents: https://docs.cardwarewallet.com/cardware-wallet-documentation/npm-package
Cardware BTC NPM Package 🛠️ https://github.com/cardware-wallet/cardware-btc
-
After Jade Plus, list is updated with another new source devices, Passport Prime.
...
https://foundation.xyz/buy-passport-prime/
Looking forward to its launch and seeing the reviews, they're being bold to trying something new that no brand has tried yet. What caught my attention the most was the possibility of saving 2FA codes on the device itself, as well as an encrypted space (serving as a pen drive) to store whatever i want.
It's April, have any users who have bought it received any updates by email, and will they arrive this April?
It would be interesting if it had some of the features that coldcard has, such as seed-xor, BIP-85 (not just for mnemonic phrases, but for other values such as xpriv, hex, WIF etc).
-
It would be interesting if it had some of the features that coldcard has, such as seed-xor, BIP-85 (not just for mnemonic phrases, but for other values such as xpriv, hex, WIF etc).
Passport Prime already have some new features with 2FA support and security keys that can be used with NFC or USB.
They could add new stuff down the road, but I don't think they are going to reproduce anything coming from c0ldcard any time soon.
-
I still consider the Passport one of the best air-gapped hardware wallets out there. The problem is I'm afraid to import it right now.
Another wallet I've been really liking is the JADE, you can even make a DIY version. The only trade-off is the Bluetooth support, but I'd have no problem using it with my iOS since it's the only way to use hardware wallets on an iphone.
Note: I don't think Bluetooth communication, even if encrypted, is as advantageous or secure as manufacturers claim.
That's why I add less amount compared to a hardware wallet with USB connection and/or air-gapped QR-Code/SD cards.
-
I still consider the Passport one of the best air-gapped hardware wallets out there. The problem is I'm afraid to import it right now.
There is no reason to be afraid, because there are resellers selling and shipping Passport device from EU and other regions, you don't have to order them from United States.
Note: I don't think Bluetooth communication, even if encrypted, is as advantageous or secure as manufacturers claim.
That's why I add less amount compared to a hardware wallet with USB connection and/or air-gapped QR-Code/SD cards.
I never liked bluetooth for hardware wallets, and I have seen how quickly it becomes obsolete in some watches.
Bluetooth 6.0 is already out, and pervious versions could soon become unusable and not supported.