I don't understand... The mine has been there for almost two years. Has the government realized this now or is this decision due to other reasons?. Because although I don't have exact information, I imagine that the air force base has been there for much longer. I suppose the interesting thing about this news would be to know what those "certain improvements and equipment" are, but I doubt we will ever know, considering the secrecy that always surrounds military affairs, and the fact that MineOne Partners Ltd. will also not be able to make statements or give its version of what happened.
Once again the so called threat to USA security is invoked.
Once again the so called threat to USA security is invoked.
It's true. It seems that when the United States government talks about “national security” everyone stops asking questions and accepts the official statement without talking about it again. Although, like I said, I know it's not going to happen, but I would like to know MineOne Partners Ltd.'s version of events so we can compare. But I imagine it's all already filed and it's a secret.
I find the Wikipedia entry very curious since some points collide with each other.
If anyone is interested in knowing more: National security (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security).
Well the twin towers burning makes a very stark image for us Americans. I lost a cousin he was a firefighter he died in the towers fighting the blaze
National security risks is really overused excuse to arrest someone or stop someone from doing something they don't like. ASIC designed only to mine cryptocurrency with specific algorithm. How can ASIC affect U.S. military installations? It doesn't make sense.
I don't understand... The mine has been there for almost two years. Has the government realized this now or is this decision due to other reasons?. Because although I don't have exact information, I imagine that the air force base has been there for much longer.
MineOne did not file the transaction with CFIUS until after CFIUS’s non-notified team investigated the transaction as a result of a public tip. CFIUS’s non-notified function has been enhanced by authorities provided by Congress in FIRRMA and ongoing appropriations to support the Committee’s ability to identify and review non-notified transactions.
It's true. It seems that when the United States government talks about “national security” everyone stops asking questions and accepts the official statement without talking about it again. Although, like I said, I know it's not going to happen, but I would like to know MineOne Partners Ltd.'s version of events so we can compare. But I imagine it's all already filed and it's a secret.
I find the Wikipedia entry very curious since some points collide with each other.
If anyone is interested in knowing more: National security (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security).
While reading the OP, I was thinking of the possible power interruption in the area as the reason why they said the mining company could pose a security risk but then I noticed it's Chinese. That is all we needed to know. No need to think about crypto and blockchain technology.
If the mining company were from the United States, I suppose nothing would have happened. That's why I came to the same conclusion as you after reading the article again.