ℹ️ ANN topic should contain link to the web site of a project. Please add that information.You need to add some text instead of images to check if they are handled by A.I.Q.10 - Does the project have a website & team? > The coin/token should have a website - with their own domain name .
First, I must admit that I don't see the need for this much social media. There are already too many of them and they mostly offer the same thing.
I will not go into the details of what is presented here, but what I see is quite centralized, certain users have greater privileges... It looks like a fairly private network.
Also, privacy and social networks do not go together for several reasons. For example, a private network, available only to a certain group of people, is not attractive for anything, not even for advertising, and that is necessary at some point in order to get life. One more thing, SM users want to be seen and this is one of the reasons for using such platforms.
I will save @Jokers time and remind you of the necessity of adding project URL linkℹ️ ANN topic should contain link to the web site of a project. Please add that information.You need to add some text instead of images to check if they are handled by A.I.Q.10 - Does the project have a website & team? > The coin/token should have a website - with their own domain name .
How will all this data be managed via Bitcoin, given the high fees and limited blockchain, is it via a second or third layer?
The purpose of the social network is to play test a newfound utilization of Bitcoin. It is not meant to compete with or replace existing social networks. If what we end up trying to prove is a success, other social media outlets (like altcoinstalks for example) can use our model and see success too.
The purpose of the social network is to play test a newfound utilization of Bitcoin. It is not meant to compete with or replace existing social networks. If what we end up trying to prove is a success, other social media outlets (like altcoinstalks for example) can use our model and see success too.
The platform seems centralized because of the word "owner", I've already proposed that we change that word to "administrator".
All I see is an empty post - I assume that's the case for anyone who uses Tor or everything was deleted for some reason?
As for the idea itself, I have already read something similar many times over the years on BTT, but I don't think any of those projects succeeded. I honestly think that we need less social networks, and more "networks" that will promote human communication in a more natural way, face to face.