I wouldn't bother watch their documentary, but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?What I am expecting is that Satoshi Nakamoto will not be revealed because they can not know who Satoshi is or are.
I wouldn't bother watch their documentaryYou'll see a lot of clips posted on social media after it's released anyway.
~ but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?This must be the big reveal posts that I've seen. I think it's a money making documentary. At this point, it doesn't really matter if he's identified or not because Bitcoin is beyond him now.
There is no possible way for this to be true at all, and I mean not even %1 chance, there isn't even a lottery chance, they did not and will not. You know why I know? Because there are 100 million and more people in crypto world, and he is one of the biggest mysteries of all time, and from big government agencies like FBI and CIA and Mossad to KGB, they are all looking for him but also all these people are looking for him as well. So eventually one of them would have found already, and this documentary doesn't have people that are brighter and smarter than this 100+ million plus all agencies combined.Well, we've been discussing Satoshi identity for years but we've only gained more insight into Satoshi's grand vision rather than uncovering his true identity. I don't believe HBO can shed any light on this even if they can create a compelling conspiracy theory.
yup it is all just a clickbait title and prospect of course people will click on it thinking they will finally have an answer but in the end there will be nothing i would like to check it out tho just to check for inaccuracies hopefully there aren’t much because a well made documentary can help educate much people but if the show is just full of misinformation then well nothing much we can doI wouldn't bother watch their documentary, but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?What I am expecting is that Satoshi Nakamoto will not be revealed because they can not know who Satoshi is or are.
I believe it's just a flashy title in the end, since if they had found out, this information would have been revealed
I think in the end they'll reveal something more generic that we all know so far, that it could be several people, and we'll continue with the same opinion so far haha
Everyone's curiosity has certainly been aroused, so the strategy has already worked :D
I'm still going to be watching it do, I have to check Netflix if it has been rolled already in Asia.
My current feeling on Satoshi's identity is:
- Sassaman is a very bad candidate. If this is their conclusion, then they totally failed to do proper research.
I guess we’ll finally find out if Satoshi is a genius coder or just a really good magician! 🎩✨ If it turns out to be Len Sassaman, I hope he’s ready for a lifetime of “Are you Satoshi?” questions at every family gathering!
Len Sassaman woukd have to.prove and sign message to old wallets.
Hes going for a wild ride of his life but anything coukd happen already in this wierd times.
~snip~
@Freemind, if you read that topic, then maybe you also read my post - however, believing the information that LS died only two months after Satoshi wrote his last post on BTT, I assumed that with regard to other information that exists regarding Satoshi's private communication - > Gavin Andersen (April 26, 2011) LS can't be Satoshi. However, considering that LS died a few months after that, it is a possible candidate to be Satoshi.
Of course, assuming that someone is Satoshi is one thing, and proving it is something else entirely. If it is true that LS left computers that were completely encrypted, then no one will be able to reliably prove anything so soon.
Len Sassaman woukd have to.prove and sign message to old wallets.
Hes going for a wild ride of his life but anything coukd happen already in this wierd times.
Kraken exchange should know the guy because recently they recieve BTC from wallet created back in 2008.
Len Sassaman woukd have to.prove and sign message to old wallets.Dude.... ::)
Hes going for a wild ride of his life but anything coukd happen already in this wierd times.
Kraken exchange should know the guy because recently they recieve BTC from wallet created back in 2008.
How could someone send coins from a wallet created in 2008 when the genesis block was mined in 2009?
Everyone preparing for another big nothingburger documentary reveal 8)
~snip~
@Freemind, if you read that topic, then maybe you also read my post - however, believing the information that LS died only two months after Satoshi wrote his last post on BTT, I assumed that with regard to other information that exists regarding Satoshi's private communication - > Gavin Andersen (April 26, 2011) LS can't be Satoshi. However, considering that LS died a few months after that, it is a possible candidate to be Satoshi.
Of course, assuming that someone is Satoshi is one thing, and proving it is something else entirely. If it is true that LS left computers that were completely encrypted, then no one will be able to reliably prove anything so soon.
Correct, and that was precisely what I was looking for a few minutes ago, more specific dates. Also taking into account what theymos have said in BTT, it is very likely that LS is not Satoshi, we must remember that he was one of the last people with whom Satoshi spoke "publicly" and take the emails into account.
My opinion remains the same, I don't think Len Sassaman is Satoshi. Now I will ask a question to all the users of the forum.
Doesn't anyone find it strange that HBO (or any streaming platform) is releasing a documentary about Satoshi, focusing on a person who died?. I hope someone understands where I'm going...
Sassaman who died in 2011, isn’t Satoshi, says his widow, Meredith L Patterson. And HBO never even approached her when making the documentary, she told DL News, “which is the strangest thing about all this to me.” ... The suggestion that Sassaman could be Satoshi Nakamoto is not a new one. When similar claims circulated in 2022, Patterson refuted them, emphasising that Sassaman was “a Mac user.” Early Bitcoin development was focused on Linux, and Satoshi had to ask for help building the MacOS version, which is the operating system used by Apple devices like the MacBook. ... Another intriguing detail that fuels the speculation: a reference found in Satoshi’s writings to an obscure academic conference that took place in 1999 near the Belgian city of Leuven — the same city where Sassaman later earned his PhD. Sassaman did not list this conference among those he attended, and its proceedings were likely accessible online.
its not even someone that people have already been speculating to be Satoshi such as Hal Finney or Adam Back or Nick Szabo. what would the effect of this documentary to Craig Wright and his believers? ;DTheir lead isn't even known by the community. Whoever are their researchers, they need to do better but still good job for making a content and making everyone curious about it but lacks convincing theories and facts.
i haven't watched it yet nor read the article about this discovery but my speculation is that if they are going to verify whether he is the real Satoshi, should they be finding out whether he kept some private keys on the wallets from genesis?
I don't have to watch the docu of HBO about satoshi nakamoto because it's for sure that they don't have any leads who's the real one. The one that they have revealed isn't even convinced himself that he's satoshi. ;D
There is no real reason For Peter Todd to deny that he is not Satoshi. He could have said that he do not have access to his wallets anymore and he does not have control of those Bitcoin. He simply decided not to lie about it.
There is no real reason For Peter Todd to deny that he is not Satoshi. He could have said that he do not have access to his wallets anymore and he does not have control of those Bitcoin. He simply decided not to lie about it. A lot of Faketoshies tried to prove themself as Satoshi while a honest guy denied that he is not Satoshi.That is the smartest thing to do, deny what you aren't, what will be the point of claiming to be Satoshi and then looking over your shoulders, when truly you are a faketoshi. Only a conman like Craig Wright would argue to be Satoshi all these years, when it is so obvious that he is not, any sensible person would not want to draw attention to himself or his family with a lie.
... but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?I will not trust the identity of whosoever the release in the documentary will be Satoshi Nakamoto because the hype around this kind of documentary is usually for them to have a lot of viewers and have financial benefit from it. I'm simply not interested in this documentary and will not be following the update on this unless perhaps I come across it mistakenly, but I would not consciously seek to watch this documentary because I believe it will be false.
If everly the true Satoshi Nakamato will surface again, it will be through forums like BTT or discords or private emails and not from such purported documentaries. It's just about clout chasing and making money and not for the benefit of the cryptocurrency industry.... but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?I will not trust the identity of whosoever the release in the documentary will be Satoshi Nakamoto because the hype around this kind of documentary is usually for them to have a lot of viewers and have financial benefit from it. I'm simply not interested in this documentary and will not be following the update on this unless perhaps I come across it mistakenly, but I would not consciously seek to watch this documentary because I believe it will be false.
Now that I heard how authors of this documentary are claiming that Peter Todd is allegedly Satoshi Nakamoto, I can only laugh and say that this is one big bullshit.
I didn't watch documentary yet, but I think that three letter government agency was involved in making this.
Majority of Bitcoin community does not agree with claims made in Money Electric.
I have not yet watched the documentary and still looking for a review od this documentary I'm sure many will post their reviews on YouTube and other social media, but one of the thing that HBO's evidence show on their documentary is this one, but of course Peter Todd will deny this and I don;t think its a strong evidence that he really is.
I have not yet watched the documentary and still looking for a review od this documentary I'm sure many will post their reviews on YouTube and other social media, but one of the thing that HBO's evidence show on their documentary is this one, but of course Peter Todd will deny this and I don;t think its a strong evidence that he really is.
They may write that Peter Todd denies this, but they are putting "Satoshi" and "Peter Todd" right next to each other along with his face, so some people might actually believe this stuff, especially on mainstream media who've never heard of him before.
I am actually starting to worry about his safety. I can't imagine how he feels now that a bunch of dim-witted criminals might actually believe this news and think he does have the 1.1 million BTC and "rob Satoshi Nakamoto".
Great point, we have seen the numbers of physical attacks on crypto holders, and so with this documentary, who knows, maybe this dim witted criminals goes after him because he is "Satoshi" after all.
Hopefully Peter will be aware of this and take his safety seriously. This could be one downside of this documentary, revealing people and we all know that he already deny this many times already that he is not Satoshi.
I have not yet watched the documentary and still looking for a review od this documentary I'm sure many will post their reviews on YouTube and other social media, but one of the thing that HBO's evidence show on their documentary is this one, but of course Peter Todd will deny this and I don;t think its a strong evidence that he really is.
There is no real reason For Peter Todd to deny that he is not Satoshi. He could have said that he do not have access to his wallets anymore and he does not have control of those Bitcoin. He simply decided not to lie about it. A lot of Faketoshies tried to prove themself as Satoshi while a honest guy denied that he is not Satoshi.That is the smartest thing to do, deny what you aren't, what will be the point of claiming to be Satoshi and then looking over your shoulders, when truly you are a faketoshi. Only a conman like Craig Wright would argue to be Satoshi all these years, when it is so obvious that he is not, any sensible person would not want to draw attention to himself or his family with a lie.
They may write that Peter Todd denies this, but they are putting "Satoshi" and "Peter Todd" right next to each other along with his face, so some people might actually believe this stuff, especially on mainstream media who've never heard of him before.
~snip~
They actually do not make such a news for people who are not interested in Bitcoin. They make it for people interested in cryptocurrency but has no deep knowledge of bitcoin. They might not have bought any bitcoin in life, maybe they joined the industry through airdop and meme coins hunting. These set of people will help spread the news without verification.They may write that Peter Todd denies this, but they are putting "Satoshi" and "Peter Todd" right next to each other along with his face, so some people might actually believe this stuff, especially on mainstream media who've never heard of him before.
~snip~
Today I read an article in my local newspaper that reads something like "Mystery solved, BTC creator found", so so-called journalists who only c/p news from other media do not question the credibility of such claims at all, but take them for granted.
However, I think that the average person who is not interested in BTC anyway is not too interested in such things, so that story will probably fade over time - especially if someone makes another documentary in which they will claim that Satoshi is actually someone else.
I can't watch the documentary as I don't have a subscription plan to HBO, and for those who are curious about it, I would say follow whatever these users are saying.
The 100-minute documentary is more of a harm than a benefit because HBO created a non-sense documentary in exchange for a security of another person.
~snip~
... but what do you think about upcoming HBO documentary?I will not trust the identity of whosoever the release in the documentary will be Satoshi Nakamoto because the hype around this kind of documentary is usually for them to have a lot of viewers and have financial benefit from it. I'm simply not interested in this documentary and will not be following the update on this unless perhaps I come across it mistakenly, but I would not consciously seek to watch this documentary because I believe it will be false.
Three letter agencies don't have time to meddle with streaming giants' productions, especially when their targets are usually elsewhere and not streaming videos to their devices.This agencies are involved in literally everything.
I have not yet watched the documentary and still looking for a review od this documentary I'm sure many will post their reviews on YouTube and other social media, but one of the thing that HBO's evidence show on their documentary is this one, but of course Peter Todd will deny this and I don;t think its a strong evidence that he really is.HBO showed a sublimated message that Peter Todd is actually Satoshi. At the same time, the whole thing was fun for him during the recording, so maybe his message of denial might not be taken very seriously.
If you watched this documentary Money Electric you would see that even Peter Todd was connected with certain government agent, same as Gavin Andresen.The government and the three-letter agency were mentioned too many times for an ordinary documentary. ::)
Some even speculate that they have their fingers in developing bitcoin.
This was stupid documentary, but I had much more fun watching another clown Stephen Mollah who is pretending to be Satoshi.
If you want to laugh I recommend watching or listening six videos from ''press conference'' in London 31/10/2024, uploaded by Jonny1000
Enjoy ;)
This was stupid documentary, but I had much more fun watching another clown Stephen Mollah who is pretending to be Satoshi.
If you want to laugh I recommend watching or listening six videos from ''press conference'' in London 31/10/2024, uploaded by Jonny1000
~snip~
Correct. It's good for a laugh, but nothing more. I don't know if the people who make these documentaries, and all those who claim to be Satoshi, think that we are idiots, or that we were born yesterday. I don't understand the point of doing these things, they draw attention that is quickly lost by not being able to show absolutely anything...Believe it or not this latest Faketoshi scammer asked everyone who was in his ''press conference'' to pay entry fee, so they are only trying to earn money with stuff like this.
Believe it or not this latest Faketoshi scammer asked everyone who was in his ''press conference'' to pay entry fee, so they are only trying to earn money with stuff like this.
It's funny that he announced another bigger event and I am sure he is going to ask money again... because he announced real ''evidence'' of his claims :P