Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Cryptocurrency Ecosystem => Bitcoin Forum => Topic started by: Gposas on April 12, 2025, 06:11:19 PM
-
Currently, the trend of Bitcoin towards national adoption has been one of the bigs news of the year 2025. With different states and nations planing and have already integrated this digital asset into it's nation's economy.
The establishment of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve pioneered by the US government has call for the consideration of BTC by other countries while others are also standing against this development.
Now, it is clear that a Strategic Reserve is being established for various reasons. But if we take a look at the reason of emergency response; either in case of war, natural disasters or a disease outbreak that affects various nations.
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
What do you think could happen to Bitcoin and how would it affect other nations?
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
-
Currently, the trend of Bitcoin towards national adoption has been one of the bigs news of the year 2025. With different states and nations planing and have already integrated this digital asset into it's nation's economy.
The current improvements in terms of adoption in most countries or regions all over the world I was actually increased drastically and it isn't something that is way too surprising because we are actually in a digital era and as a result we should expect the world to take a digital turn too.
I can remember a discussion in couple of days ago where a school in I think Florida actually allowed the use of Bitcoin recently as part of their payments options for school fees. It's nice and we hope more enthusiastic adoption comes.
-
it could become the currency we will be using not just on international trades but probably we could be using BTC on government and on local stores. i also read that school trying to adopt BTC, i think this is only possible if there is adoption of BTC in the local level already where people will not just accept our digital cash but also our BTC if they allow.
thats what BTC will become. a online currency meant to spend.
-
Currently, the trend of Bitcoin towards national adoption has been one of the bigs news of the year 2025. With different states and nations planing and have already integrated this digital asset into it's nation's economy.
The establishment of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve pioneered by the US government has call for the consideration of BTC by other countries while others are also standing against this development.
Now, it is clear that a Strategic Reserve is being established for various reasons. But if we take a look at the reason of emergency response; either in case of war, natural disasters or a disease outbreak that affects various nations.
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
What do you think could happen to Bitcoin and how would it affect other nations?
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
Currently, we haven't seen any BTC sell-offs by governments in response to crises. The German government did sell 50K BTC, but that was just a step in their plan to liquidate illegal assets.
Let's say the US needs money to maintain government operations: they'll borrow more from the Fed, sell bonds, and easily get trillions of $. They don't need to rush to sell BTC for a few tens of billions of $. The same goes for other governments: if they wanted to sell a lot of BTC, many companies and organizations worldwide would be happy to buy BTC at a low price compared to its true long-term potential.
-
it could become the currency we will be using not just on international trades but probably we could be using BTC on government and on local stores. i also read that school trying to adopt BTC, i think this is only possible if there is adoption of BTC in the local level already where people will not just accept our digital cash but also our BTC if they allow.
thats what BTC will become. a online currency meant to spend.
That's right, I also saw a related news that a school in the UK precisely Lomond School has accepted BTC for the payment of tuition fee.
But my concern now is the volatility, when sell off begins to happen amongst these firms, Institutions, and Nations in the future on this asset what will be the impact?
Currently, the trend of Bitcoin towards national adoption has been one of the bigs news of the year 2025. With different states and nations planing and have already integrated this digital asset into it's nation's economy.
The establishment of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve pioneered by the US government has call for the consideration of BTC by other countries while others are also standing against this development.
Now, it is clear that a Strategic Reserve is being established for various reasons. But if we take a look at the reason of emergency response; either in case of war, natural disasters or a disease outbreak that affects various nations.
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
What do you think could happen to Bitcoin and how would it affect other nations?
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
Currently, we haven't seen any BTC sell-offs by governments in response to crises. The German government did sell 50K BTC, but that was just a step in their plan to liquidate illegal assets.
Let's say the US needs money to maintain government operations: they'll borrow more from the Fed, sell bonds, and easily get trillions of $. They don't need to rush to sell BTC for a few tens of billions of $. The same goes for other governments: if they wanted to sell a lot of BTC, many companies and organizations worldwide would be happy to buy BTC at a low price compared to its true long-term potential.
You're right mate, currently we are experiencing the growth/development stage of this establishment, the sole aim now is to acquire more BTC and increase holdings.
But what would it look like when this acquired asset begins to storm the market in sell off to settle one situation or another? Or else they are just willing to acquire more BTC without selling at any point in time.
-
-snip-
I can remember a discussion in couple of days ago where a school in I think Florida actually allowed the use of Bitcoin recently as part of their payments options for school fees. It's nice and we hope more enthusiastic adoption comes.
Adoption like this makes Bitcoin more known and of course in the transactions made Bitcoin becomes a new payment option that is more transparent.
But the problem is that if the government is corrupt or those who are not open to transactions like in a school where many mafias control transactions, they will not accept Bitcoin or crypto as payment, because they cannot manipulate the transaction.
-
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
What do you think could happen to Bitcoin and how would it affect other nations?
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
It really depends, if the event is published as news, it can trigger a massive effect. However, lately, such events tend to cause only short-term dumps. If institutions step in to buy the dip, especially at the selling price of the affected country, the drop might just be temporary. But if none of that happens, there's a higher chance it could turn into a long-term dip.
-
If we consider the reason for using Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, it was from a cryptocurrency that was seized without the "taxpayer" having to pay any additional money to purchase more Bitcoin.
Therefore, given the nature of the global economy and the size of the Bitcoin market, it is still small compared to the economy.
-
Now, it is clear that a Strategic Reserve is being established for various reasons. But if we take a look at the reason of emergency response; either in case of war, natural disasters or a disease outbreak that affects various nations.
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
What do you think could happen to Bitcoin and how would it affect other nations?
it could be possible for bitcoin's price to decline due to huge amount being sold by a country if they wanted to take their money out and use it for whatever reason but how will that affect other nations? not much i suppose unless they are also holding some bitcoins or they are at war with the country who just pulled out their bitcoins
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
mate countries do not only have bitcoin in their reserves yes they will add it to their reserve but they will have other assets as well of sources of money to get from a country can't just depend on one thing especially on something as volatile as bitcoin
-
And these nations is in need of funds to tackle the situation and they want to break the reserve by selling off their long hold BTC.
It is called reserves because it would be taken from and added to but not in a way that the countries will all be selling at once just like other money each countries have in their reserves. Do not expect any country to sell all its bitcoin holdings at once or almost at once. A good asset is just a good asset. That is the reason you will not see a country just adopt bitcoin as a reserve. Once they start, they are not planning to back down.
-
If a government barely has any cash for addressing emergency's such as natural disasters, epidemics, and war, then they probably should not be investing all that into Bitcoin and other cryotocurrencies.
The whole point of a strategic reserve is to hold the coins like an investment and profit off its gains.
-
These conditions are severely threatened if many countries want to sell large quantities of bitcoins given that such an act is capable of reducing the value of bitcoins. It was found that Bitcoin is an asset which reacts significantly to such movements and large scale selling by countries has an added impact on volatility. For the countries that decided to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve in early stages, the major benefit is that they can accumulate more bitcoins hence could support flamboyant selling pressure. But this also gives us a good reason to be careful while handling risks or relations with other parties. Spoofing of large sales or buys could especially affect countries that are relatively small players in the international Bitcoin market or those whose central bank’s only reserve is Bitcoin.
-
Currently, the trend of Bitcoin towards national adoption has been one of the bigs news of the year 2025. With different states and nations planing and have already integrated this digital asset into it's nation's economy.
The current improvements in terms of adoption in most countries or regions all over the world I was actually increased drastically and it isn't something that is way too surprising because we are actually in a digital era and as a result we should expect the world to take a digital turn too.
I can remember a discussion in couple of days ago where a school in I think Florida actually allowed the use of Bitcoin recently as part of their payments options for school fees. It's nice and we hope more enthusiastic adoption comes.
Discussion Florida school is the best example for knowing bitcoin future in cryptocurrency world. We know that a school of Florida, we know that a couple pay school fees use bitcoin. I also believe that in future many country country can use bitcoin for there family activities. Because we could understand easily bitcoin users increasing gradually. I think that if bitcoin users can increase gradually, i think that they want to use bitcoin for different activists. So i expect that every country if permit bitcoin for there country, i think that poverty rate will decrease gradually.
-
If a government barely has any cash for addressing emergency's such as natural disasters, epidemics, and war, then they probably should not be investing all that into Bitcoin and other cryotocurrencies.
The whole point of a strategic reserve is to hold the coins like an investment and profit off its gains.
Profit is at helm, as always - and especially with a person like Trump in the office, - with that, I can definitely agree.
-
Could it be the case of who hits the market first is prone to get funds? Because if the selling pressure is high then the price collapses, nations are left to get less funds than invested to tackle their countries emergency situation.
mate countries do not only have bitcoin in their reserves yes they will add it to their reserve but they will have other assets as well of sources of money to get from a country can't just depend on one thing especially on something as volatile as bitcoin
That's right, diversifying their Holdings is something very vital, I believe there must be other assets either tangible or intangible that are being placed in a Reserve. But the most popular I know is Gold Reserve, until the uprising of a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
Nevertheless, I bet the future holds something nobody can tell but I still feel if clash/conflict happens between countries who has adopt Bitcoin, then the power to crash the market price will be centralized on who sells first.
-
The establishment of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve pioneered by the US government has call for the consideration of BTC by other countries while others are also standing against this development.
The political elements and US campaign are still felt, so the presence of Bitcoin Strategic Reverse could be just an effect of fulfilling Trump's campaign promises to his supporters from the cryptocurrency sector... yes, we can't see that as a serious decision as long as we don't see the US making large purchases or adopting cryptocurrency... as long as that doesn't happen, Trump's decision on cryptocurrency like his promises is just wishful thinking, because we still need something real...
Trump has the power to influence, so he could just talk about it without taking more serious action... even though the market responds to everything Trump says.
-
In case of a massive humanity crisis, all traded assets would go down and that may include Bitcoin when holders would just choose to let go of what they are keeping for years to get the funds they need. This is just a natural reaction but there is a chance that in a case something like this Bitcoin will eventually be a winner as more and more people will be looking for safe haven of their assets. Now, everything we are saying here can just be hypothetical and what can happen in the real world may not be the way we imagined them to be. So far, we have not seen a game-changing event that can be a model for Bitcoin (or any crypto for that matter) in such a cataclysmic scenario. Let's hope we will not be able to deal with this concern in the coming years.
-
The establishment of Bitcoin Strategic Reserve pioneered by the US government has call for the consideration of BTC by other countries while others are also standing against this development.
The political elements and US campaign are still felt, so the presence of Bitcoin Strategic Reverse could be just an effect of fulfilling Trump's campaign promises to his supporters from the cryptocurrency sector... yes, we can't see that as a serious decision as long as we don't see the US making large purchases or adopting cryptocurrency... as long as that doesn't happen, Trump's decision on cryptocurrency like his promises is just wishful thinking, because we still need something real...
Trump has the power to influence, so he could just talk about it without taking more serious action... even though the market responds to everything Trump says.
Actions speak louder than words, in our case.
And politicians love to play in the waiting game as long as they can, to maneuver in case of need.