Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Domithra on July 20, 2018, 03:35:16 AM
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
-
Everything is good, but mostly in my country people tend to use a lot of Facebook. So to give or spread information faster through Facebook .
-
Yes the allocation of twitter and facebook campaigns is not proportional to the allocation of articles. if the participant bounty facebook and tweitter in the limit in the number of participants may be a fair thing.
-
At times sharing a post on facebook is not much work but reporting every week involves a lot of work. Both give almost rhe same results but it also depends on your follwers on the platform too.
-
I noticed twitter had more participants than Facebook. Seldom to happen that Facebook is more participants than twitter. Mostly the allocation is always the same. Both is better tools to promote ICO.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
Adding on to the unfairness facebook and twitter always have more participants to share the small pool of coins. Unlike signature they are paid with higher amount of coins and also lesser participants.
-
Actually I prefer to use twitter to promote a project. Because twitter is simple and able to reach out to the whole world and can include many followers.
-
I believe that the promotion of the company through Twitter and Facebook is not so difficult. Of course, I want to get more for my work, it's harder for me to write articles, I think that they should pay for it more than for social networks.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
I think Both is good, Facebook and twitter campaign. But I prefer signature campaign.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
I personally like face book campaign because my friend and follower is 10k.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
Both are good, But I prefer twitter campaugn because my follower is 15 k.
-
Mostly the bounty pool for facebook and twitter are the same. The percentage given to facebook and twitter are mostly almost the same. It mostly depends on your followers or friends.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
Maybe for some who are familiar in facebook and twitter campaign but for me i think signature campaign is good which is more popular and with higher bounty reward allocation.
-
The more secure and easy to work look like facebook campaign. to get friends is also easy. twitter rules are very difficult to do. there is often a suspension of twitter accounts spreading crypto ads.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
facebook n twitter bounty is easy but like shit now days. there are so many peoples in these bounties. so u get very less stakes. we need huge following for good quantity stakes. signature n translation is best because of highest paying bounty campaign n less participents. if you are a good translator then go for translation bounty and in signature campaign you have to post positive n constructive content. then u get huge stakes from it.
-
both is bad for me, ive never get good amount of reward if participating on twitter or facebook, linked in and medium is better than facebook or twitter for reward because particpant of linkedin and medium is not as much as facebook and twitter
-
facebook and twitter campaigns are equally good but I would rather join in his signature camp
-
Facebook and Twitter are social media campaigns, which usually get smaller prizes than other campaigns. whereas usually, these two campaigns, must have the most participants. in my opinion, is the right of the gift manager to give how much prize we receive later. so if we feel the facebook and twitter campaigns get too small a gift, then we do not have to participate in it. just follow a campaign that gives big prizes, like a signature campaign.
-
This two bounties are paying less because of the numbers of participant. I suggest to go for signature bounty. Social media campaign are always flooded with participant.
-
Based on my observation I think facebook is good in campaigns because in facebook it is easy to use and very simple how to create while in twitter mostly of peoples cannot understand on twitter to used.So I think facebook is much better for all people users.
-
if I follow the campaign more often campaigns, because bounty facebook his work is not too complicated and his income was quite a lot.
-
I also can not understand why the facebook is paid more, we work the same way and there and there :(
-
if I support more campaign Twitter campaigns, earnings from bounty Twitter campaigns a lot, we can get a lot of tokens if bounty Twitter campaigns his project has been last.
-
For me, i prefer twitter because its easy to when it come to posting and more crowded than facebook. Twitter also is more allocation than Facebook.
-
jajajjaa is indeed the fact like that bro!
we must be smarter to choose a campaign so you can get more tokens.
it's better to join the Signature and Content Creations campaign because it's usually high.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
I think It depends how much your friend or follower. But I personally prefer signature campaign, It is more profitable.
-
Both seems to be the same to me, choosing between this two should be determine by which social media platform you are more comfortable in growing the followers.
-
They are all good and mostly have the same allocation of stakes or tokens for it. Sharing and reporting of links are almost the same.
-
they are both bad.
signature and reddit is 10 times better than those two.
Reddit pays really nice
Facebook and twitter requires tons of work
-
In my opinion, between Facebook and Twitter are both good in the Bounty Campaign. Because they are both still famous and favorite social media used by many people to date. If there is indeed a difference in the distribution of tokens from one of them, it is likely the decision of the Bounty Manager. So social media like Facebook and Twitter have no effect on our Bounty income.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
We have to consider the target market. I'm pretty sure majority of the participant's friends/followers on facebook and twitter are not even interested in crypto.
-
Facebook and Twitter bounty campaigns are all regarded as social media campaigns and are normally awarded the same percentage pool of the tokens allocated for the whole Bounty program. Facebook and Twitter campaigns demands a lot of hard work yet are usually given the least percentage pool. Seems unfair.
I think It depends how much your follower or friend in twitter and facebook. It is my opinion.