Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: yousufatik on October 06, 2018, 12:58:20 PM
-
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
-
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
The problem is most ICO creators don't know about rates so they can't spread reasonable amount of tokens for marketing purpose. If they get a professional help that would be win win for both part. Bounty users are not guilty here, ICO creators decide how much tokens will be given in bounty campaigns.
-
They have made a big mistake to blame bounty hunters. Bounty hunters are innocent in this matter since they only hold a little amount of tokens. Who hold bigger amounts? I think whales, big traders, and developers have a larger amount of tokens. Even though bounty hunters make the rates decrease, it is only temporarily. Stop blaming them, think realistically!
-
There is no doubt bounty hunters have played a role in the current doom on the market, since they dump most of their coins when listed on exchange. So bounty hunters cannot be entirely blame free. But majority of the blame has to go to the the holders of the large percentage of the tokens and it's certainly not bounty hunters.
-
The % allocated to bounty is very low (from 1% to 4-5% max) so bounty hunters can't be blamed and they are not responsable for a project fall... if project is good price will not go down even in this difficult moment (or it goes down but less than other projects).
-
In a way, bounty hunters also share the blame for dumping of prices. Let's accept the fact that only a handful of airdrop or bounty hunters would keep their reward for long term.
-
Whales and developers should be blamed in this case. They hold the tokens or coins in large amount. They can manipulate crypto market with their tokens or coins. I think bounty hunters don't have capability to control crypto market.
-
Bounty programme usually have 1%-2% these numbers have a very low efficiency on the price of any Tokens/Coins before they blame bounty hunters they should blame the huge crazy bonuses that hand out during different phases of ICO, if you gonna sell huge amount of tokens with 60% or even in some cases 80% bonuses you should expect those to sell pretty cheap.
And this 1% or 2% is spread between thousands of users which mean the possibility of sell at the same time is low, maybe also blame the bounty cheaters that are running 50+ accounts on the same bounty because of they are one person after all and will sell at the same time. But the normal bounty hunter can hardly do any effect on the price of any token.
-
yeah they just miscalculate about the bounty reward. and i think the percentage about the bounty reward is too small if we compare with the developer portion and discount portion. Sometimes the developer itself sell them too in a big portion, not only the bounty hunter. but the answer is if that cryptocurrency has a value/good product inside, dont need to worry about cause the investor will buy them too when their price is down.
-
If I would be holding an amount of token, I would either keep it. Some projects holders have their very fear in giving the bounty hunters their pay because some of the the will sell it, lowering the price of each coin.
-
Well maybe for bounties, they need to wait a lot longer after the ICO to distribute their tokens. But I feel like many ICOs are priced too high so there's not a whole lot of profit margin for investors. Many projects are priced as if they're gonna be in the top 100, which probably won't be the case.
-
Not all Bounty hunters are wrong. they only want payment for their work. The guilty one is an ICO project that gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to bounty participants if they are afraid their tokens will drop?
-
Not all Bounty hunters are wrong. they only want payment for their work. The guilty one is an ICO project that gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to bounty participants if they are afraid their tokens will drop?
Well, really, according to our friends, a lot of bonus tokens at the private sale will make a dump when the price is already on the Exchange.
Don't be mistaken for a bounty hunter because it's the fault of investors.
-
I think the bounty hunters are not guilty and they only selling the rewards to get a profit. I think some of them still holding the tokens because they are sure that the token can increase higher in the future and they know that the project is good in the long-term. I think the investor take their part too when the token is released and they are selling their tokens to make a profit like the bounty hunters. but if the project is really good like I said, then the project will increase higher in the long-term.
-
Actually most of the time it’s investors who blame the bounty hunters. I can understand them they think bounty hunters get the coins for free which they paid money for but this is not a correct way of thinking. Bounty hunters spend time and they play a very important role in the advertisement of the project.
-
They are all looking for excuses during this bear market. It seems these projects want to use the bounty hunters for free exposure. Then when the bounty hunter succeed in getting their project talked about and they have a great ICO then the bounty hunters are evil dumpers not allowed to get paid for their work. Lovely job isn't it. The real reason the coin is dumping is because the project leads are dumping. Not the few scraps we hunters get.
-
bounty hunter received only a few percents of the allocation alone and that I don't think it can be said the decline stemmed from a bounty hunter. I think it's a reasonable thing to happen and of course depending on the team behind it also can run or not. If indeed nice of course despite the price drops will be up again in some time.
-
I think the problem is in marketing, they don't use the right strategy, if they blame the bounty hunters it's wrong, because with the bounty hunter marketing ICOs are helped. Marketing should think of a good way so that the ICO is successful, not blame the bounty hunters.
-
I don't think it's wrong from a prize hunter if the price of a token or coin goes down. Though the intention of the bounty hunter is only the Project Bounty campaign they have. If indeed the investor cannot get the money back, it means that it is wrong from the project team who cannot run the project properly and suffer losses.
-
Come to think of it, percentage allocated to bounty reward are little compared to what investors have control over. I am not totally disproving the fact that bounty hunters dump coin but the blame also fall on investors whose bonuses are more than bounty rewards and can also dump since bonuses are not paid for.
-
I don't think all hunters make mistakes, but if compared, about 30% hold their coins so they get a profit,
but their right also if they want to sell that they can at least want to enjoy the results of their work.
that is to blame is the ICO project which gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to reward participants if they are afraid their tokens will fall? and give gifts to airdrop first and hunter after that
-
I don't think all hunters make mistakes, but if compared, about 30% hold their coins so they get a profit,
but their right also if they want to sell that they can at least want to enjoy the results of their work.
that is to blame is the ICO project which gives a big bonus. Why don't they give coins that are more valuable to reward participants if they are afraid their tokens will fall? and give gifts to airdrop first and hunter after that
a good strategy, give airdrop prizes first and then to the bounty hunter.
and it's true, bounty hunters can't be blamed, what I have to blame is marketing and concept,
actually it is anticipated that the coin does not dump.
-
there is no doubt bounty hunters have played a position inside the present day doom on the market, considering they sell off maximum in their cash while indexed on exchange. So bounty hunters can't be completely blame unfastened.
-
They have committed a major error to accuse abundance seekers. Abundance seekers are guiltless in this issue since they just hold a little measure of tokens. Who hold greater sums? I think whales, enormous brokers, and designers have a bigger measure of tokens. Despite the fact that abundance seekers make the rates diminish, it is just briefly. Quit pointing the finger at them, think practically.
-
Probably, bounty hunters are the less important group in the project.
People cannot blame the big holders so the tendency is to pinpoint the bounty hunters. In fact, in some cases it is right due to some hunters that doesn't have enough knowledge to deal trading.
-
Guilty for what? The price dump could be because of manipulators and not from bounty hunters. Hunters can dump the price but they cannot maintain dumping for having small amount of tokens.
-
in some cases this is true because some hunters do not have enough knowledge to trade. Perhaps, gift hunters are a less important group in this project.
One cannot blame the big holder so the tendency is to determine the prize hunter.
-
Basically, gift hunters are not wrong as long as they can be consistent in their work. In fact, the risk is wrong from the Project Bounty itself. Project failure is caused by the absence of incoming investment. The edges of it all must be wrong from the project. Because the project makes the project less attractive so no investors enter.
-
Actually, most bounty hunters I have seen usually sell off their tokens when they receive their tokens and this causes massive drop in price of a project and an investor would be on deficit on his invested capital. In my opinion, its not only bounty hunters that are guilty. Also, private sale investors also sell off because they usually receive massive discounts and this makes them be in huge profit when tokens are listed.
-
Gift hunters cannot be fully blamed. There is no doubt the prize hunters have played a position in today's destruction on the market, considering they sell the maximum in their cash while being indexed on the exchange.
-
Bounty hunters only guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. bounty hunters are not guilty because they're working for the projects. make the marketing becoming effective and gain the tokens from that projects. Bounty hunters are very valuable for ICO project..
-
Bounty hunters are doing promotional assignments for a project or ICO, the level of difficulty in this promotional job is related to the reward they get after the project or ICO is completed.
Bounty Hunter is guilty of cheating on promotions, such as not posting but reporting other posts to gain stake, using someone else's ID to register more than 1 account in a bounty campaign and many other cheating
-
i understand why called bounties hunters are guilty because bounties hunters usually will sell their tokens immediatelly after get paid and automatically the price of those token will fall because most of them are more likely to dumped the price and that's why some of ICO project only alocated 10% or less from total tokens supply for bounties program to ensure the price at the exchange more stable and not fall to the deep..
-
Actually not a prize hunter who is blamed. But the project side. Because prize hunters only carry out their duties for the Bounty Campaign to attract investors. While the incoming capital is managed by the project, not the prize hunter. so if there is a loss from the Investor, it's all wrong with the project, not the bounty hunters.