Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: shadow.bishop on November 28, 2018, 08:12:38 PM
-
Buterin considers that blockchain is often used where it isn't needed. He has some doubts about IBM blockchain and blockchain-based food trackers.
For more detail;
https://qz.com/1471152/ethereums-vitalik-buterin-says-ibms-corporate-blockchain-is-missing-the-point/
-
Everyone is free to share opinions on certain matters but I think Vitalik should just focus on improving ethereum. He maybe the founder of one of the most popular blockchain platforms but he does not own blockchain technology.
-
Buterin considers that blockchain is often used where it isn't needed. He has some doubts about IBM blockchain and blockchain-based food trackers.
For more detail;
https://qz.com/1471152/ethereums-vitalik-buterin-says-ibms-corporate-blockchain-is-missing-the-point/
This is Buterin's slightly odd reasoning that blockchain technology is used where it is not needed. If it is used, then there are people who believe that it will benefit there. If this technology in a particular area does not benefit, then after a while it will disappear there. I believe that we do not need to interfere in the process of applying blockchain technology, even if it is used most widely, nobody will be harmed by this.
-
Buterin considers that blockchain is often used where it isn't needed. He has some doubts about IBM blockchain and blockchain-based food trackers.
For more detail;
https://qz.com/1471152/ethereums-vitalik-buterin-says-ibms-corporate-blockchain-is-missing-the-point/
Well he might have his point to point to doubt that some of the industry that adopting blockchain is not really needed. However i only see advantages to the growth of crypto coins and gaining more awareness through this. Nothing bad will happen to crypto even if crypto is adopt for nothing shouldn't he be more happy then judt doubting them.
-
Everyone is free to share opinions on certain matters but I think Vitalik should just focus on improving ethereum. He maybe the founder of one of the most popular blockchain platforms but he does not own blockchain technology.
I agree. Vitalik should not forget that owning two or three altcoins doesn't mean owning the all blockchain. As far as I know bitcoin is still the only one that can turn the market to on fire or off fire.
-
yes many say that. blockchain function to make transactions easier. blockchain-linked food is an unreasonable idea.
-
He should just let other people do their own thing using blockchain technology. Whether it's needed ot not is not really his concern. I trust other groups such as IBM has seen something that Vitalik hasn't.
-
He is right, some projects keep incorporating blockchain into different sector which clearly not suited for them. Example is good sector, how come the blockchain can help it grow? Maybe utilization of it but not totally necessary.
-
Buterin considers that blockchain is often used where it isn't needed. He has some doubts about IBM blockchain and blockchain-based food trackers.
For more detail;
https://qz.com/1471152/ethereums-vitalik-buterin-says-ibms-corporate-blockchain-is-missing-the-point/
Buterin should just concentrate on making the ethereum blockchain better and leave other matters that are not his business alone.
-
blockchain can be used in any field, it is a very simple concept. And all applications revolve around one idea - a record that is testable and immutable.
-
I generally agree with Vitalik Buterin because there are too many project that uses blockchain only to raise funds where project really does not need blockchain or this is not essential for that purpose.
I really hope that this crysis will cuf off every useless projects so that only the good ones will survive and become stronger.
-
I don't doubt blockchain technology, but some ideas often appear even I see blockchain being used on every farm to produce good fertilizer, everyone has opinions and they can express their opinions freely, this is technological progress and some ideas don't make sense , but must get a good response if it is useful
-
I got the point. Yes, Vitalik is right.
I'm not discussing IBM, but discussing something else, for example : ICO project lately.
There are a lot of ICO that out of place, not suitable, and forced to be connected with blockchain.
And most of them are fraud, just wanna get reach easily, take investors money and so on.
We must be diligence, Guys
-
this is an inter-altco statement war and we can only watch and draw our own conclusions which is best for us. if we are provoked and we cannot judge which information is correct, we will be trapped in a loss in crypto
-
In my opinion i think Vitalik should just focus on improving ethereum. He maybe the founder of one of the most popular blockchain platforms but he does not own blockchain technology.
-
Everyone is free to share opinions on certain matters but I think Vitalik should just focus on improving ethereum. He maybe the founder of one of the most popular blockchain platforms but he does not own blockchain technology.
-
Vitalik should not forget that owning two or three altcoins doesn't mean owning the all blockchain. As far as I know bitcoin is still the only one that can turn the market to on fire or off fire.
-
It is just his own opinion. I don't know why he stated it but I think we shouldn't be afraid with that comment. Blockchain is like a booster for cryptocurrency. It gives instant impacts for the improvement of crypto and for sure to other fields that utilize the technology.