Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: ayatoslaw on December 14, 2018, 06:47:14 AM
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
-
I agree with your opinion. We need some changes in ICO, at least it can reduce many bad cases for scam projects and increase the interest of investors to put their money in ICO coins anymore. I feel that investors become lack of trust in ICOs currently.
-
Although the type of regulations will tell, but I believe that regulation will do more good than harm to especially the ICO investors.
-
Of course it needs them, such a projects could be very risky, so at least some regulations would be very useful - as long as we don't ban them, like China is trying to do (more on spam blocked b (https://www.spam blocked b/beijing-security-token-offerings-may-be-illegal/), but you've probably heard that)
-
the rules regarding ico are very important because by doing so they will reduce the ico that is a scam. with this regulation, it will also help investors and bounty hunters to choose the ico for them to follow. I think it will be useful.
-
In order to put everything in the right place regulations must be strictly implemented. Honest admin of particular ICO should do his/her very best to maintain the systematic strict friendly regulations.
actually, if you want to direct the people from different places, regulations must be presented in order not in missy ending. It is strategy to manage well the entire system.
-
The existence of regulations will certainly have a good impact not only at the ICO
with the regulation will reduce fraud at the ICO itself and allow investors to re-trust the ICO project itself
-
Yes ICO Regulation is very necessary i think that is a welcome idea in cryptocurrency industry because it will help to reduce fake and scam project in the cryptocurrency system.
-
Regulation is the need of the hour as many ico gone scam in last few months and investors lost their hard earned money and if this market comes under regulations then there are low chances of scamming to investors.
-
Regulations will make investors more comfortable when investing in ICO, each regulation will bring good things to advance the future of ICO projects to avoid fraud
-
Without regulation, there is much freedom in which it is use to scam many investor of their money. With regulation an ICO has to meet certain goal and standard before been approved with that the market will be good again
-
I think we need strict regulations to improve the quality of ICOs around. There is alot of scams around today, so the regulations is absolutely needed
-
I am fully in support of ICOs being regulated, there is too much scam these days in the cryptocurrency world, with regulation at least it will reduce.
-
if an ico has rules then I think it will be safer. where the bounty hunters or investors will be spared from ico who is a scam. but we also have to know that it is not easy to predict the ico who is a scam. therefore we must be more careful in choosing it.
-
It may be good if ICO should be regulated. But, does the team of the project agree? because it will make them pass the complicated rules and regulation. And who can regulate the ICO? The government or company or something else? That's what I think now.
-
We need some changes in ICO, at least it can reduce many bad cases for scam projects and increase the interest of investors to put their money in ICO coins anymore.
-
Well for me I think yes. I have heard so much about fake ICOs and they are just destroying the real value of having to use cryptocurrency for a good purpose. FUD could have been started by these fake ones because people will fear that there investments will just go to nothing but loses.
-
I agree with regulation for ICOs. I am afraid investors will leave ICOs if there are no changes in ICOs. There are a lot of scam projects, failed projects, or fake team cases. I think it will be regulated soon to have a better ICO future.
-
ICO regulation will increase transparency in the product and save investors from losses. In last month, scam ICO has been seen in which investors have suffered losses.
-
Yes, I also agree with your opinion, regulation is already there, but according to me the results have not been seen until now. I think organization like SEC must act more decisively.
-
that's right, guys, because now there are a lot of ICO emergencies, because those regulations are really needed in an effort to sterilize various kinds of fraud in the crypto world
-
I sure do agree that ICOS needs to be regulated because if they aren't, the one or two investors still hanging around are not going to want to continue investing in ICOS due to the high rate of scams. If they are regulated, this will give room for the genuine ones to be seen and invested in.
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
To reduce ICO scams, I think It is good idea. I agree, I think ICO need regulations. Regulations will have a postive impact.
-
Yes. Ico projects needs to be regulated as soon as possible to prevent it from "going into extinction".
There are proferation of icos , and most of them are solving similar blockchain challenges.
Some icos are just out to scam unsuspecting investors.
There is the need for the creation of a regulatory body.
-
No regulations the market was already broken down long ago. Regulation doesn't mean to regulate the whole crypto processes but just to maintain things in order accordingly. It helps to make crypto place beautified.
-
This question has been asked many times by many people and my answer remains the same. Although this was not the initial plan of cryptocurrency but there has been alot of bad things happening in the crypto world where scammers and useless projects come up. Regulation can cramp them down since the crypto universe can't do something about that
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
Yes i am also agree with you. Everything must be a rules and regulations that ICO also should have a rules that if anybody want to serve an ICO he must have to follow that. Maximum times we see problematic ICOs that does scam and i think for market falling down that may be reason. So there should be a regulatory board who control ICOs rules.
Thanks.
-
A very good idea if the bounty has regulations that govern it. Because it will reduce the existence of a bounty that is scam and does not pay according to existing provisions. So that bounty hunters can be protected from fraudulent practices by those who make bounties.
-
Of course, we need ICO regulation, because more than half of the companies that make ICO are real scammers and should be punished for this, so the cryptocurrency and ICO regulation will lead us to security.
-
Of course, we need ICO regulation, because more than half of the companies that make ICO are real scammers and should be punished for this, so the cryptocurrency and ICO regulation will lead us to security.
Regulation is a great necessity.Participants in bounty ant investors are tired of so much insecure ICO.
-
Yes there's a need to regulate ICO because it will help to reduce crime and scam project.
-
I think that regulation or which barrier mechanism of protecting investors from unscrupulous companies would not hurt. Less would be frank scam
-
Yeah, ICOs need a little regulation. It will be better for its future. ICOs have experienced a bad year in 2018, so it is better to have a change in 2019. Maybe by a little regulation, investors will be more interested in ICOs anymore.
-
Yeah, ICOs need a little regulation. It will be better for its future. ICOs have experienced a bad year in 2018, so it is better to have a change in 2019. Maybe by a little regulation, investors will be more interested in ICOs anymore.
I agree with you if bounty needs a little regulation. There are many investors that don't trust longer in ICOs because of failed and scam projects. We need to find out the solution to this problem. And the regulation may be a good way to deal with the bad situation.
-
ICO needs regulation, it can have good impacts on the interest of people to join ICO. There are many bad issues in ICOs currently, so we must get the solutions. Regulation will make people feel safer to join ICOs.
-
Honestly, yes so much.
Nowadays, we will find so many ICO scams that really make many investors, token holders, and also all participants being deceived and bad for this. However, how can it be regulated? I think they should give their real ID on their social media or website.
-
I was one of those that totally against regulation for anything related to Crypto but looking at how things going I would say regulation is a must for ICO to protect investors because they are the main key in ICO and losing them means losing the whole ICO business altogether.
-
At this point with the rate of scam project which took place and made away large sum of money from investors and for projects with no real use I do say that regulations are needed to prevent people loosing money
-
Yes, Icos need regulations. People are abusing the ico systems by chuning out coins that has no single use case let alone of trying to improve the blockchain technology.
We need regulatory bodies to regulate icos.
-
Yes there's a need to regulate ICO because it will help to reduce crime and scam project.
I agree it can reduce the number of fraudsters. But I am not really sure in what way to regulate ICO. This is what I am still thinking. If then ICO will be regulated, the regulation must be an effective way. If it is not effective, then it just wastes a time to regulate it.
-
Recently there are many fraudulent projects that collect investors money and disappear after a while. To prevent such situations regulation ico is necessary. Regulation will protect investors and increase the level of confidence in this method of attracting investment.
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
I agree mate, I think regulations will usefull to prevent scam projects. Because too many scam projects now.
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
Absolutely YES and its a must ICO's are need to be regulated to protect the Investors interest and cryptocurrency industry as a whole againts those scammers that wrecking havoc on the ICO market.
-
Your opinion is very good and I think it really is very necessary so that there is not much going on ico is a scam, and it can make the trust of investors or bounty participants to be more enthusiastic in hunting prizes.
-
The activity of the ICO needed to be regulated several years ago, then now we would not have such a bad state in this kind of activity. The absence of any regulation in the ICO attracted a lot of scammers, and almost all ICO teams now write that they have the right to change any rules for bounty hunters at any time. This means that no agreement is valid and the ICO team can simply declare that they have decided not to pay us for our services and will act within the stipulated conditions. This lawlessness should not be.
-
I agree mate, I think regulations will usefull to prevent scam projects. Because too many scam projects now.
Yeah, it will be very useful to prevent fraudsters or scammers. I am also aware that there are too many scam projects wit fake team profiles. I think the regulation should focus on identifying the team member's ID and project information.
-
Of course, it needs in order to decrease the scams. However, how is the way? I don't think that there will be easy ways for us to regulate the ICO. Should we ask their ID photo in their website to make us sure that they are real?
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
yes, I agree with you mate. I think ICO needs regulations, because I see too many scam now. We must be carreful
-
I agree that regulations must be in place to regulate the ICO, because so that not just anyone makes a random ICO, so this could be a strong reason why regulation is needed,
and regulations are also useful to prevent scam projects and I believe this regulation will have a positive impact on the development of new projects.
Absolutely I agree that ICO needs to be regulated to erased the doubt and Bad image that damaging the ICO Market Potential those Scammers must penalized and punish in strong possible means.
-
government intervention are very good in the cryptospace so that admin can be identified by the investors and we have huge protection against fraud. I think, the world must see the crypto currency as part of financial system and must regulate it, so we could have order in our ecosystem.
-
yes the settings in ico are very important, and I am very happy if there are settings in ico, because it will be able to reduce coins or scam projects.
-
It is the lack of regulation of the activities of the ICO that has led to such a bad state. This activity is now almost frozen. It needs changes and, above all, regulation. State regulation will be most effective, although it involves the danger of over-regulation and undue interference with the work of the ICO. However, I still do not see any other way out.
-
I am not sure if ICOs are going to survive due to all the chaos ...
I would say that ICOs need regulation for sure, but will that be prevention enough against fraud, crazy people, naif teams, etc??? Not sure exactly... I think that there is a serious lack of educational tools for people wanting to join the crypto sphere, maybe there is also a lack of interested people that want to learn instead of just go crazy looking for quick cash
-
Strongly agree, regulation is very necessary in the ICO process. Because as we know, in the past, very many crypto projects ended in fraud. So rules are needed, which will make it difficult for these fraudsters to take our money through fake ICO
-
At present, a lot of scams has occurred, even though there have been regulations made. Imagine if there is no regulation, everyone can make ICO itself and the scams will increase. Regulations were created to reduce and prevent scams so that no more.
-
Exactly. ICO really needs some regulation. But, who create the regulation and who assess the regulation. In this case, we can conclude that it may be regulated but it will be difficult to realize. Unless we ourselves who must analyze them carefully to avoid scams.
-
Indeed, it is necessary to regulate, because every day there are various projects, of which some are scammers. This has an effect on the fact that investors are afraid to invest their money in projects. I hope regulation will appear in some time and this situation will change.
-
Yes I thiink ICos need regulations.
This is to reduce the proliferation of the cryptosphere with tokens or projects that does not add value in any way to the blockchain technology.
-
ICO seems no need regulation, it just needs time to recover and come back to best performance. In 2018, there were many failed ICOs or turned to scams projects. I think with the bad experiences, investors will need time to ensure themselves to come back.
-
regulations are very necessary in the ico space to prevent scam projects, so that people don't just make ico with unsold products on the market
-
Given the many frauds on the ICO project, I strongly agree if the regulations apply to the ico that will appear. This is for the comfort of all of us who are involved in it.
-
the question is who will run the regulation. it is a hard task to run regulations for projects and also for ICOs. the clear plan is to do your own research in every investment you want to join else you will waste lots of money. some projects have no focus. all they want is the money from people.
-
There were too many scammers in 2017, at the moment when the rise of Bitcoin lured many new players to the market. The bear market has driven many scammers out of the game, because after the Bitcoin collapse:
1) many potential investors left the market.
2) Increased awareness of people investing in projects. They began to think more about what they were doing and how it should earn them money.
I do not deny the fact that the ICO market needs rules. But it should not be iron mittens. Everything must be adequate and plastic. It often happens that some investors, by their very nature, are starting to spread incorrect information about the project and accuse of fraud. It is necessary to make sure that the project has the right to defend its reputation and to protect itself from attacks. And since we are talking about the regulation and punishment of unscrupulous projects, then we should not forget about unscrupulous investors.
I say this because I myself have seen how people invest money without even reading WP projects, and then they are surprised at why the project does not develop along the path that they want. Such people are prone to panic and very often begin to spread false information, guided by personal insults. Some of these people require projects to buy trading volumes. But, as far as I know, it is generally illegal.
-
Many ICO scams in 2018, there is a list that I can see from other forums, but I can't put the BTT link here.
Fake ICO projects will harm many people, especially investors and for the progress of cryptocurrency, I strongly agree that there are regulations to make ICO safer for investors and the crypto community
-
I always prefer regulations. For the smooth functioning of every work their are regulations required.
-
I always prefer regulations. For the smooth functioning of every work their are regulations required.
Yes, you are right. Regulation is needed to make ICO be better. Regulation may function to make investors more trust in ICOs. They will think that regulation can guarantee security. As there are many bad issues related to the security on ICOs, then regulation may be a good solution.
-
Of course it is necessary. This is to limit the movement of ico so that it is not too free which eventually appears fake ico too.
The most important thing is to give confidence to investors to get back up, because ico appears with new regulations.
-
the fact really there's a clamor that we need changes in
ICOs projects or should be regulated, yes I'm in favor because we are all experience the scam ICOs which contribute bad image on crypto space,and many potential investors losing their trust and eventually create fears to crypto community. again I'm in favor to be regulated by my question is who
manage the regulation and create law's? but if people only have god fearing there's no need to create regulating body, every one should nead quick change and remove the greedy in our hearts.
-
I think we need to start thinking of how the systems of regulation to the certain ICO., and who will make the regulation. One of the ways sometimes should be the one that they can control But t=it is impossible. Probably, we need to ensure that their team is real by doing KYC for the team.
-
There were too many scammers in 2017, at the moment when the rise of Bitcoin lured many new players to the market. The bear market has driven many scammers out of the game, because after the Bitcoin collapse:
1) many potential investors left the market.
2) Increased awareness of people investing in projects. They began to think more about what they were doing and how it should earn them money.
I do not deny the fact that the ICO market needs rules. But it should not be iron mittens. Everything must be adequate and plastic. It often happens that some investors, by their very nature, are starting to spread incorrect information about the project and accuse of fraud. It is necessary to make sure that the project has the right to defend its reputation and to protect itself from attacks. And since we are talking about the regulation and punishment of unscrupulous projects, then we should not forget about unscrupulous investors.
I say this because I myself have seen how people invest money without even reading WP projects, and then they are surprised at why the project does not develop along the path that they want. Such people are prone to panic and very often begin to spread false information, guided by personal insults. Some of these people require projects to buy trading volumes. But, as far as I know, it is generally illegal.
regulation for ICO is like need and not,
but seeing the fact that many investors who rarely read WP or do not do research is a clear reason,
that taking an ICO requires a lot of steps and must be careful.
-
So far, we can say for sure that the catastrophic situation with ICO projects largely occurred precisely because of the lack of government regulation of ICO projects. It is necessary that the authorized state bodies check the ICO team, establish clear rights and obligations of the participants in these relations, including protecting the rights of investors. Then the popularity of ICO projects will rise again. In the meantime, I see that states are not in a hurry to do this. One gets the impression that they are deliberately demanding regulation to discredit the very idea of ​​cryptocurrency.
-
regulation for ICO is like need and not,
but seeing the fact that many investors who rarely read WP or do not do research is a clear reason,
that taking an ICO requires a lot of steps and must be careful.
So, what is the decision? Is it needed or not? For me, I think it is no need for bounty hunters but for investors, it is needed. I don't see the necessary thing for bounty hunters to have ICO regulation. I still don't understand with the regulation need.
-
They seriously needs regulation cus of increase scam and fraud activities going on in the industry
-
Audit and regulation must be created by an altcoins as well, so I'm sure the altcoins that make the regulations and the audit will be the pioneers for these altcoins.
Suppose like Hacken is strong in terms of auditing in the finances of a project.
-
I strongly agree with your opinion that the regulation in ico is very necessary and helps bounty hunters to follow good ico.