follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Eugene_O

Pages: [1]
1
I want to share my experience with ICOPools.io. The CEO Anton Moss (Telegram @tonimoss; gmail: [email protected]) and his company ICOPools.io offered us to attract investors through pools. Because his company does score and has ties with the CEO of the investor pools. The main condition of collaboration was the analysis of the company and submitting information on ICOpools.io website. According to a fact, which Anton told, it is the only way to attract investors. In cases, if it will be deficiencies in this analysis, the company can correct them to do more attractive for pools. Our company paid them $ 2,000 for this proposal. Anton promised to present our project in the minimum of five pools. We agreed to these terms.
The first unexpected news for us was low score (5.2 of the 10) of our project provided by ICOpools.io. When we've considered all comments and made changes, our score increased only to 5.7 out of 10, despite we have taken into account all their requirements. Numerous of our requests evaluated our project objectively were without the answer. We hadn’t the promised five pools. We got the impression that our company was not even shown to the pools. Instead of this, Anton asked to increase for the extra charge ($6000), because it is difficult to convince the pools with such low score. Unfortunately, Anton didn’t explain how the actual evaluation of the project can be increased after additional payment.
 Initially, they indicate recommendations to attract clients (project evaluation, posting information on the ICOpools.io website), and then didn’t do further steps. All official accounts: Facebook, Twitter, Medium of ICOpools.io are not active. ICOpools.io gets money from customers, by selling inactive resources which will not give traffic or attract investors.
As result, we hadn’t any pools and any good rating that this company made for us.
So, we wasted our time and money. After research, we mentioned that a low activity in their official accounts. It seems strange that the website with good statistics( about 500 K visitors) has low activity in social networks.
Unfortunately, I am very disappointed in collaboration with ICOpools.io. The activity is misleading. Instead of attracting pools and earning a percentage of the attracted investments, this company earns on paying customers its analysis, but without any work with the pools. I will advise being careful with this project. Eugene
 

2
Tokens/Coins Offerings (ICO, IEO, etc.) / Re: ICO pools
« on: September 26, 2018, 11:20:04 AM »
I want to share my experience with ICOPools.io. The CEO Anton Moss (Telegram @tonimoss; gmail: [email protected]) and his company ICOPools.io offered us to attract investors through pools. Because his company does score and has ties with the CEO of the investor pools. The main condition of collaboration was the analysis of the company and submitting information on ICOpools.io website. According to a fact, which Anton told, it is the only way to attract investors. In cases, if it will be deficiencies in this analysis, the company can correct them to do more attractive for pools. Our company paid them $ 2,000 for this proposal. Anton promised to present our project in the minimum of five pools. We agreed to these terms.
The first unexpected news for us was low score (5.2 of the 10) of our project provided by ICOpools.io. When we've considered all comments and made changes, our score increased only to 5.7 out of 10, despite we have taken into account all their requirements. Numerous of our requests evaluated our project objectively were without the answer. We hadn’t the promised five pools. We got the impression that our company was not even shown to the pools. Instead of this, Anton asked to increase for the extra charge ($6000), because it is difficult to convince the pools with such low score. Unfortunately, Anton didn’t explain how the actual evaluation of the project can be increased after additional payment.
 Initially, they indicate recommendations to attract clients (project evaluation, posting information on the ICOpools.io website), and then didn’t do further steps. All official accounts: Facebook, Twitter, Medium of ICOpools.io are not active. ICOpools.io gets money from customers, by selling inactive resources which will not give traffic or attract investors.
As result, we hadn’t any pools and any good rating that this company made for us.
So, we wasted our time and money. After research, we mentioned that a low activity in their official accounts. It seems strange that the website with good statistics( about 500 K visitors) has low activity in social networks.
Unfortunately, I am very disappointed in collaboration with ICOpools.io. The activity is misleading. Instead of attracting pools and earning a percentage of the attracted investments, this company earns on paying customers its analysis, but without any work with the pools. I will advise being careful with this project. Eugene

Pages: [1]
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod