follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DFortune

Pages: [1]
1
UniJoin.io's use of CoinJoin to anonymize transactions is interesting. While the single, combined transaction with multiple inputs and outputs makes tracing difficult, it relies on a large user pool for effectiveness.

The article mentions a "Wallet Distribution" option. It would be helpful to understand how this distribution is determined. Does it affect anonymity or simply the number of outputs users receive? Additionally, the emphasis on users storing the "letter of guarantee" raises a question.  Without server-side data storage, how can UniJoin.io handle potential disputes or ensure user confidence in case of lost letters?

Let's also explore the claim of random fees between 1% and 3% with four decimal places. Such granularity seems unusual and could be explained further.

2
Hey team, this looks like a good project, but I'm surprised I haven't heard about it considering that it launched over five years ago.

I'm reading through the initial post and can't help but notice a couple of claims I'd like some clarification on.

The article claims that the platform "does not shuffle available funds in one or multiple pots, but exchanges incoming bitcoins with coins purchased from investors - cryptocurrency exchanges."

What are those investor cryptocurrency exchanges? Are they regular cryptocurrency exchanges, or are there some special investment vehicles set up for this particular purpose?

Also, regarding your process of mixing coins, you wrote: "Our transfer algorithm selects independent investors and trading platforms, and breaks down your funds in a manner that completely removes a link between input and output transactions. We neither require registration nor store logs. Once the mixing is done and the transaction confirmed, the data on processed transactions is deleted. For each mixing request, we issue a digitally signed letter of guarantee, which confirms our obligations to the client."

How can this be independently verified to give users confidence and trust that coins are properly mixed and cannot be traced?

I see there's a lot of attention on the project and an influx of intending users, so I believe this is a valid question that should be addressed.

Pages: [1]
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod