follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here Ads bidding Bidding Open

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - ZionRTZ

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35
481


The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled charges with two former executives of AriseBank, which was hit with a token sale fraud lawsuit in early 2018.

Former AriseBank CEO Jared Rice Sr. and former COO Stanley Ford will pay a combined $2.7 million in disgorgement and penalties, as well as $187,767 each in penalties. While neither admitted or denied the charges, both have also agreed to lifetime bans from serving as officers or directors of public companies and from participating in digital securities offerings.

Specifically, the two will pay $2.26 million in disgorgement and $68,423 in prejudgement interest.

Moreover, both are permanently prohibited from violating antifraud and registration provisions of federal securities laws.

AriseBank’s ICO was halted by the SEC in January of this year, which sued the company and the individuals behind it for allegedly committing fraud.

The Texas Department of Banking issued a separate cease-and-desist order against the company a day earlier, noting that the company was not authorized to provide banking services in the state, where it was based.

Rice was arrested late last month by the FBI after being indicted on separate criminal charges of securities and wire fraud. He allegedly lied to investors about AriseBank’s authorizations, claiming the “first decentralized banking platform” could offer Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-insured bank accounts, credit and debit cards through Visa and other services.

However, the platform reportedly has no relationship with the FDIC or Visa.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/former-arisebank-execs-settle-charges-in-sec-ico-fraud-lawsuit

482
Cryptocurrency discussions / 2018 Crypto Year in Review
« on: December 13, 2018, 12:28:06 PM »
The year is not over yet but I think this is already a good time to assess or review what happened this year and what to expect in 2019. Take a look at Glyph co-founder James Greaves' contribution. https://www.coindesk.com/crypto-2018-was-a-tale-told-by-an-idiot-but-it-doesnt-have-to-signify-nothing

Quote
Crypto 2018 Was a Tale Told By An Idiot – But It Doesn’t Have to Signify Nothing



I’m completely out of crypto and I’ve been selling my bitcoin and ether all year.

Does that disgust you? Disappoint you?

If you just met me, I’m guessing that would be your first question. (When did you buy?) Unfortunately in crypto, the price when you entered appears to have some bearing on how much you know about blockchain.

However, I’d start by asking another question. When did it become doctrine to HODL and sacrilege to sell? Where does the peer pressure emanate from?

At the end of 2018, you can proclaim from the housetops that you will HODL to the end of time and you will be applauded, venerated as a sage — even if you’re lying. But if you’re going to sell, you need to slink quietly out the back door. You have broken the unwritten rules of the cult of blockchain.

My hope is that in 2019 we begin to question the norms we’re holding onto, and that are holding us back.

Consistency is the Hallmark of the Unimaginative

As we enter 2019, my belief is that crypto will need a lesson in strategic execution. Like it or not, there are others like me.

My initial aim was to use crypto for everything in life, replacing all fiat, a hope that was almost immediately dashed when I entered the market at around $3,000 just last year (there’s your answer to the above question). The promised land appears no closer now than it did in January.

As a store of value, I just don’t find cryptocurrency useful — it certainly hasn’t stored much value for me this year. Others likely feel the same.

Others, too, (like me) took the leap as entrepreneurs.

A finance MBA with a track record in venture capital and strategic consulting, I left my job as an executive at a SaaS technology company to start a blockchain venture. All year, I have been hearing that 2018 is the year that institutions get involved and “real players” (or at least traditional players) start to adopt the technology.

Well, some of us came. What did we find? Hype. Hyperbole. Dogma. A cult that made little sense. Not much value. Few actual results.

If I hear one more “investor” tell me I need to pay them and they will “coach me” and then introduce me to their Chinese friends, I’m going to lose my mind. Yes, it happened all the time this year.

This year I have been told:

  • Give me $1 million upfront so I can help raise you $10 million (no guarantees)
  • Give me $500,000 upfront so I can introduce you to my wealthy friends (no guarantees)
  • Pay me $100,000 a month to be an advisor for you — you will get me as an advisor
  • Pay me $20,000 a month and I will coach you every week. We will get on a conference call with my other ICOs (from someone who has never built anything)


We are the industry that is trying to change everything. What we need is constant change until we usher this technology into the world and deliver on the hype (which is significant).

The blockchain industry is both culturally inspiring and culturally broken. There’s so much good: It’s open, inclusive, revolutionary and empowering. But it’s also shady, dishonest, mercurial, and often straight-out illegal.

ICO, I Barely Knew Ye


That said, it may take use a decade to unpack all that happened in 2018 completely.

To get some distance and perspective, bitcoin’s price will likely end up five times lower than when it started, but up three or four times since January 2017.

The problem is the loudest and most visible parts of the industry have been much too focused on speculating, on raising coins quickly, flipping and making a buck. That has dragged the rest of the industry into asking bad questions. We speculated on “utility tokens” that provided no utility and had teams which have never one anything successfully before individually, let alone as a team.

But we shouldn’t forget that ICOs successfully disrupted VC, surpassing even early stage VC investment. It’s a landmark achievement for such a young industry.

I believe the ICO model still holds promise, although in a more mature way and perhaps under different guise. We’ll have to fight to keep that narrative alive. While the VC model has given us Google, Facebook, Uber, and, well pretty much everything you’ve ever heard of, the ICO model has given us ethereum and CryptoKitties.

So, the ICO model hasn’t yet replaced VC as a viable funding methodology. Promise has been shown, but the boom and bust has given its enemies ammunition to fight against it.

The Pick-and-Shovel Business

The first wave in any revolution need to be the loudest. The visionaries come first. In settling the West, first we had the mappers and fur traders, they roamed the wild and brought back tall stories and exotic things. Some found gold. That brought the gold rush, the second wave.

But prospectors don’t build anything of lasting value. I’ve been to gold rush towns in the Nevada desert. Once the gold is mined, the people leave. That’s what ghost towns are. It’s the third wave that settle the West, the farmers, the builders. They’re the common, boring, quiet folk that raise families and settle in a place forever.

Their impact is large, but their voice quiet because they’re not out carousing in the saloons and they’re not flashing their bags of gold dust.

The good news for us third-wave settlers is that there is a lot that needs to be built. At my company Glyph, we are building KYC and accredited investor tools to help the blockchain community, built with decentralization in mind out of the gate. But we need more companies that help new blockchain ventures hire and scale their management teams, pay staff in crypto, collaborate as sub industries and rapidly form strategic partnerships through research and business development.

Culture is the sum total of how everyone acts and what we are prepared to put up with. The only way you can change it is by collectively making a stand.

I, too, have been guilty of creating this culture by not doing anything to stop it. By accepting it.

In 2019, I will call this out every time I see it. I have been doing it privately since June. Maybe it’s time to start shaking out the bad actors publicly. Kicking out the wolves so the rest of us can build what needs to be built.

As 2019 starts, perhaps it’s time to reflect on what truths we hold self-evident, and which need to be eradicated from the vernacular. What are we really rallying around? Where are we going and more importantly, how are we actually going to get there?

If we are focused on the right things, we can cut through the noise.

In 2019 I hope there will be:

  • No more white papers. Instead people will evaluate companies on their ability to deliver results
  • More support companies providing tools and insights upon which others can build
  • No more blockchain advisors
  • No announcements between blockchain companies until someone has built something
  • Mergers of companies that can’t deliver with those that can
  • A large majority of blockchain conferences going out of business
  • More compliance, custody and technical tools that support more transparency and adoption
  • Security tokens that fulfill their hype while at the same time avoiding all the pitfalls of ICOs
  • Differentiation in the public eye between currencies and speculation.


It’s still early days. There’s a lot more to come. There’s so much happening that is so positive.

483


Venezuela has reportedly begun converting pensioners’ monthly payments into its controversial cryptocurrency, the petro.

According to the Caracas Chronicles, an English-language politics and economics blog based in the country, the government has recently been taking the bolivars (the country’s current fiat currency) paid to its elderly residents and automatically swapping them for petros.

Normally, a pensioner would receive their monthly sum in bolivars, shift the funds to a bank account, and withdraw the fiat from a local branch, the blog explained. However, the government apparently converted residents’ bolivars to petros after sending the funds.

Notably, this conversion happened after the government first sent the payments in fiat to residents’ web wallets, meaning the Venezuelan government sent pensioners their funds, withdrew them and replaced with an equivalent value of petros.

Users who connect a petro wallet to the pension portal would then be able to withdraw their funds, though the blog noted that the petro cannot yet be used. Petros can then be converted back to bolivars.

In a follow-up tweet, the Caracas Chronicles noted that the value of the petro relative to the bolivar is unstable, rising from 9,000 to more than 15,000 over the course of a few weeks.

Venezuela’s president, Nicolas Maduro, first announced that the petro would be used for the country’s pension system in August during a televised event.

The token was first announced last year as part of an effort to “advance monetary sovereignty,” though the proposal was immediately opposed by the National Assembly (and later sanctioned by the U.S. government).

While the nation claims to have successfully raised hundreds of millions of dollars – potentially as much as $5 billion –selling the token, it is unclear who has invested in it or how much has actually been raised.

Residents are already required to purchase passports using the cryptocurrency, and the nation’s salary systems are also expected to begin using the petro.

More recently, Maduro said Venezuela will sell its oil for the petro, rather than the U.S. dollar, to decrease the dollar’s importance in the oil market.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/report-venezuela-is-forcibly-converting-pension-balances-to-the-petro

484


“People often say that ‘blockchain will change the world with dot-dot-dot.’ Now everybody needs to figure out what ‘dot-dot-dot’ is, and build it.”

That’s how Jonathan Johnson, president of Overstock.com’s Medici Ventures, describes the blockchain-focused venture fund’s goals for 2019. He told CoinDesk that, for Medici’s 19 portfolio companies, the focus of the coming year “should change from coming up with new ideas to executing on those ideas.”

Since 2014, Overstock has invested $175 million in Medici’s portfolio companies, a list that includes the security token trading platform tZERO, enterprise tech provider Symbiont, voting app Voatz, lending startup Ripio, data managing platform Factom, and others.

Although it began as an investment arm, Medici may soon become the publicly traded company’s core business, as founder Patrick Byrne is seeking to sell the flagship online retailing site by February. If all goes according to plan, the sale would leave the company with “Medici, it’s assets and a bag of cash,” according to Johnson.

But while he said the management team views blockchain as a long-term investment, they are aiming to see some preliminary results soon.

“We want our portfolio companies to focus on having their products in production,” Johnson said, going on to explain:
Quote
“When you have a product, it starts to open up the creative juices, [people start] asking ‘how we can use it’ and it changes the discussion. When it’s mostly about technology, people want to talk about the Merkle tree, mining, nonces… All that talk gets confusing and in the way of progress.”

Medici’s chief operating officer, Steven Hopkins, agreed that delivering a product shifts the narrative.

“We need to do more than just explain what blockchain applications can be,” he said in an interview. “We need to show people how amazing blockchain is by launching blockchain products. When people can use a product, they are half the way up the learning curve of what blockchain is. And now they actually care how it works.”

By way of example, Johnson added: “I don’t know if my mother-in-law cares if a voting app uses blockchain. She would say: ‘Wait a second, is it a safe and secure way for me to vote? And I don’t have to go and wait in line at a junior high school for three hours and wait two weeks until I know who my congresswoman is?’”

Early returns

In fact, that example is more than theoretical – Johnson cited Voatz as an early success in the Medici portfolio.

The blockchain-based voting app was piloted in two West Virginia counties this year during the primaries in May, when only 13 people used it to vote. Then during the midterms in November, it was rolled out for 24 out of 55 counties. According to the official state data, 144 voters in 30 countries used the app to vote. The pilot was open to West Virginians who live overseas, a group that includes members of the military serving in foreign countries.

It’s worth noting that Voatz has been widely criticized this summer, with journalists and cybersecurity analysts questioning the quality of the solution, its security and the very notion that the app in its current state is a blockchain-based system.

Those criticisms aside, Medici considers the early results promising.

“Voatz’s debut in West Virginia went really well,” Johnson said. “It was really limited, and I think the way Voatz and the state rolled it out over the primaries, and then during the general election, was wise. I looked at some letters that came to Voatz from the military folks that said things like: ‘You finally made me like to vote.’”

As it stands, people have to rely on quite a lot of links in the chain to make sure their vote was counted as cast, Johnson went on. Even if those carrying out the voting process are reputable and highly trusted, he claimed, blockchain gives a voter an unprecedented opportunity: to log into the system after the fact and check if their vote was really counted.

This approach can radically revamp trust in the whole institution of elections, Johnson believes, so that people can “trust the system and not worry about Russian hackers.”

After the overseas voters, the next testing wave for Voatz should include disabled voters, then absentee ballot casting, Johnson believes — and then anyone should have an option to vote via the app if they want to.

Playing the long game

Despite Medici’s drag on Overstock’s bottom line – the unit lost $39 million in the first nine months of the year, contributing to a total net loss for the company of $170 million – Johnson said the plan to sell the retail business and focus on blockchain is supported by patient investors who believe in Byrne’s vision.

“Our shareholders are interested in the blockchain business, and when you look at our last earnings call, it was slide 23 when we started talking about our retail business,” Johnson said. “The Overstock team makes decisions based on what’s best for the long-term value for the company, not what’s best for the Q4, Q1, or whatever quarter we are reporting.”

Another priority in the coming year for Medici will be launching tZERO, the regulated exchange for security tokens that Byrne has long touted as a solution to Wall Street’s inefficiencies and lack of transparency.

Technically, the exchange has been open for two years, only trading tokens representing preferred shares in Overstock. However, activity has been light, with only 10 trades taking place between mid-December 2016 and March 2018, according to a public filing.

The exchange will be up and running in earnest in January, according to Johnson, and its first additional asset will be the tZERO equity tokens that the platform sold to more than 1,000 accredited investors in August, raising $134 million.

While uncertain and still-developing regulatory regimes remain a significant impediment to effectual deployment of the technology, Medici-backed startups see working with governments directly as a critical step toward tackling that.

This is what Medici-backed startups are doing outside of the U.S., like Barbados-based fintech startup Bitt talking to central banks in the region about issuing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), or Medici Land Governance working with the Zambian government on a digital land registry.

All this helps “going from an over-regulated world to, maybe, a clearly regulated world, then to a less regulated world and to a decentralized world,” Johnson believes.

Noting that the U.S. government is “the biggest middleman” in the country right now, Medici leadership believes that the regulatory environment can be changed step by step.

“If you look at travel agents and the internet — we didn’t get rid of them overnight, we just showed that they are less and less useful for us,” Johnson said, adding:

Quote
“So, we take incremental steps in this way, we see the middlemen less necessary, we see the regulation maybe unnecessary, and we get to a point when everybody can agree with it.”

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/overstock-venture-chief-expects-market-for-blockchain-products-in-2019

485


Germany’s second-largest stock exchange, Boerse Stuttgart Group, is set to launch a cryptocurrency trading platform in the first half of 2019.

The firm announced Wednesday that it has partnered with a local fintech company solarisBank to create an engineering infrastructure for digital assets trading. solarisBank, which operates with a banking license in the country, will also be Boerse’s banking partner for the venture.

“With its combination of technology and banking expertise, solarisBank is a great partner for us to offer central services along the value chain for digital assets,” said Alexander Hoptner, CEO of Boerse Stuttgart.

Initially, trading for bitcoin and ether will be enabled on the platform, with support for other tokens expected once its initial coin offering (ICO) platform – also currently under development – goes live.

Both individual and institutional investors will be able to trade on Boerse Stuttgart’s crypto platform, which will offer features similar to its stock trading platform. This includes open order books and order execution in compliance with relevant laws.

Boerse Stuttgart is also seeking a regulatory approval to offer multilateral trading facility (MTF) for its crypto trading marketplace. MTF is a type of trading system that allows matching buyers and sellers of financial instruments using electronic systems.

The stock exchange first revealed its plans to launch platforms for crypto and ICO token trading in August of this year, as well as a trading app called Bison and custody services for cryptocurrencies. The trading app will be launched by Boerse’s subsidiary Sowa Labs and will offer fee-free trading at launch, the firm said at the time.

Just yesterday, SolarisBank also teamed up with a crypto payments startup Bitwala to help them offer crypto banking services in the country.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/major-german-stock-exchange-to-launch-crypto-trading-platform

486


Opera has announced the public release of its “Web 3-ready” Android web browser, which notably sports a built-in cryptocurrency wallet.

Previously available in beta, Opera for Android supports ethereum’s ether and other tokens using the network’s ERC-20 standard. The app also provides support for crypto collectibles (ERC-721 standard) such as CryptoKitties, as well as ethereum-based decentralized apps, or dapps, that can be accessed from the wallet.

“Until now using cryptocurrencies online and accessing Web 3 required special apps or extensions, making it difficult for people to even try it out. Our new browser removes that friction,” Charles Hamel, the product manager of Opera Crypto, said in a statement.

Speaking to CoinDesk, Hamel said the new product is largely the same as the beta version, but as it was approaching a “much wider audience” the firm had taken feedback on board and updated the app’s user interface “significantly.”

It now displays “less confusing language” to users and reduces the steps needed to set up the wallet.



The firm opted to support ethereum because it has the “largest community of developers building dapps and has gathered a lot of momentum behind it,” according to Opera.

Opera’s crypto wallet integrates the ethereum Web3 API, facilitating interactions with dapps. The firm is calling it a “tool to access information, make transactions online and manage users’ online identity in a way that gives them more control.”

Hearing the feedback

Hamel said that, during the beta stage, Opera had received feedback from developers wanting to ensure their dapps works as intended in the browser.

As a result, “we have better stability and better dapp compatibility,” he said, adding that the wallet is “much more secure than a browser extension.”

With the Android browser now available on the Google Play store, Opera plans add similar updates to its full desktop browser for Windows, Mac and Linux some time in 2019, while a developer version is already available for testing.

Regarding an Apple iOS app, though, Hamel told CoinDesk that, since it’s a more “challenging” and “strict” environment” for app providers to operate, “It’s not a focus for us right now.”

Krystian Kolondra, executive vice president for browsers at Opera, said in a statement:

Quote
Our hope is that this step will accelerate the transition of cryptocurrencies from speculation and investment to being used for actual payments and transactions in our users’ daily lives.
In October, Opera announced a partnership with blockchain advisory and financial services firm Ledger Capital to further explore blockchain technology. At the time, the two companies said they were seeking new applications and use cases for blockchain, as well as “growth opportunities” for the tech within Opera products.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/opera-browser-with-built-in-ethereum-wallet-sees-public-release

487
News related to Crypto / Crypto Platform Cubits Begins Insolvency Procedure
« on: December 12, 2018, 11:48:37 AM »


United Kingdom-based cryptocurrency payment platform Cubits has filed for administration following a sudden outage that locked customer funds, a company press release revealed Dec. 11.

The act of filing for administration means that an insolvent company has appointed an external administrator in order to act of behalf of its creditors.

Cubits, the trading name of legal entity Dooga Ltd., claimed it had lost funds worth €29 million ($32.8 million) to “fraudsters” in February 2018 that it was unable to reclaim.

Now, Dooga has brought in administrators “to work with those who are owed money by the Company and to collect monies that are owed.”

“Our goal is to achieve the best outcome for creditors generally at the earliest possible date,” one of the two newly appointed administrators Steve Parker commented in the press release, continuing:

Quote
“Dooga’s current position is secure, investigations are proceeding and we will be writing to creditors, formally, this week.”

Both of Opus Restructuring & Insolvency (a part of Opus Business Services Group), Parker is joined by Trevor Binyon to work as “Joint Administrators” for Dooga.

Cubits users had raised the alarm Monday after the platform’s website went offline. At the time, the company’s Twitter account claimed the reason for the downtime was “maintenance.”

The website subsequently went from claiming services would “be right back” to a generic error message Dec. 12. The website now shows a copy of their press release explaining the administration procedure.

Some users reacted coldly, claiming they had already been waiting several weeks to withdraw funds.

Opus Business, now in charge of Cubits’ administration, has not responded to a request for comment on users’ locked funds by press time.

The February episode focuses on three Chinese traders who allegedly purchased Bitcoin (BTC) on Cubits via Malta-based payment processor Pay Secure Online Ltd, regularly known as PaySec.

The company allegedly never paid Dooga the fiat due, leaving the company with debts totalling €35 million ($39.7 million). In August, a Maltese court upheld a garnishee order (third party order) filed against PaySec, which Dooga openly claims “colluded” with the traders.

“Since February, Dooga has made every possible effort to recover these funds,” the release continued:

Quote
“Unfortunately — contrary to expectations — these efforts have been unsuccessful up until now.”
In a separate controversy, an analysis of Dooga’s activity on LinkedIn revealed its payments coordinator Eloise Debono is an endorser of infamous alleged ponzi scheme OneCoin.

Its head of crypto business, Max Krupyshev, left the company in November before its financial woes became public.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-platform-cubits-begins-insolvency-procedure-after-alleged-hack-locks-users-funds

488


United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Jay Clayton has said this week that he is “optimistic” that developments in distributed ledger technology (DLT) can “help facilitate capital formation.”

Speaking as part of a testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — published on the SEC website Dec. 11 — Clayton added that DLT offers “promising investment opportunities” to institutional and retail investors alike.

Clayton’s testimony spanned various aspects of the SEC’s oversight — including its regulatory and policy agenda over the past fiscal year as well as its “new strategic plan,” and 2019 “near-term” focus.

Within this context, Clayton emphasized the agency was “focusing a significant amount of attention and resources” on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), distributed ledger technology (DLT) and digital assets.

In regard to his self-declared “optimism” about the investment opportunities provided by the new sector, Clayton outlined a range of the agency’s initiatives that aim to “foster innovation” and protect investors” as part of a “balanced regulatory approach.”

These include guidance from the SEC’s Corporation Finance director, Bill Hinman, on how to evaluate whether a given digital asset is deemed a security under U.S. federal law, and the appointment of an associate director (Valerie A. Szczepanik) in the same division to serve as a dedicated senior advisor for digital assets and innovation.

As part of its internal crypto regulatory coordination efforts, he noted the SEC’s creation of a dedicated Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology (FinHub) this October, which he characterized as a sign the SEC’s “door remains open to those who seek to innovate and raise capital in accordance with the law.”

Clayton made further reference to the agency’s attempt to coordinate inter-agency oversight with other regulators, and to proactively issue ongoing public statements in regard to ICOs and cryptocurrencies, most recently this November.

The agency chairman closed his discussion with a mention of the “unfortunate” case of bad actors that “prey on investors’ excitement about cryptocurrencies and ICOs to commit fraud or other violations of the federal securities laws.”

As reported earlier this week, Clayton has remarked that ICOs can be effective, but require regulation and compliance with securities laws to ensure they offer participants the same degree of investor protection as in traditional equities and fixed income markets.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-chairman-expresses-optimism-about-dlt-investment-opportunities-in-senate-testimony

489


The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has put out a Request for Information (RFI) asking for public comment and feedback to enable it better understand Ether and the Ethereum blockchain as it seeks to expand its cryptocurrency knowledge base beyond bitcoin.

In a press release dated December 11, the regulator stated that it is seeking the feedback to inform its grasp of the mechanics, technology and markets for cryptocurrencies outside of bitcoin which has historically dominated the conversation.

The RFI will accept responses for 60 days after being published in the Federal Register. Clarifying what the information request seeks to achieve, an excerpt from the announcement reads:

Quote
In a Request for Information (RFI) that will be published in the Federal Register, the CFTC is asking for public feedback on a range of questions related to the underlying technology, opportunities, risks, mechanics, use cases, and markets, related to Ether and the Ethereum Network. […] The RFI also seeks to understand similarities and distinctions between Ether and Bitcoin, as well as Ether-specific opportunities, challenges, and risks.

According to the statement, the information gathered in the course of the exercise will be used to improve the CFTC’s knowledge bank on the subject of cryptocurrencies, which will position it for effective regulation as the space continues to grow. The data and responses gathered will also be used to inform the activities LabCFTC, the body’s Fintech initiative that aims to bridge the gap between the regulator and financial innovators.

ETH Futures Speculation

The announcement could be a hint at the preliminary workings of an Ether futures trading framework. Up to this point, the only cryptocurrency with regulated futures trading is bitcoin – a state of affairs that has historically fueled its outsized crypto market dominance. In November, CCN reported that Nasdaq  is planning to introduce a dedicated bitcoin futures market before the end of Q1 2019 after working through an approval process with the CFTC.

If it does turn out that the CFTC is in the early stages of exploring approval for Ether futures, this could have a significant positive impact on Ethereum following its recent dethronement by XRP to become only the third most capitalised cryptocurrency.

In line with the CFTC’s pro-innovation stance, the RFI is one of a number of methods that it deploys to ensure that its regulatory system does not result in overreach which stifles innovation according to University of Arkansas law lecturer Carol Goforth. CFTC chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo is himself notably pro-crypto, declaring recently that crypto is “here to stay“, whether or not it upstages the US Dollar as the de-facto world reserve currency.

Source: https://www.ccn.com/ethereum-futures-inbound-cftc-asks-for-public-comment-on-eth-network/

490


Electronics giant Samsung has filed applications for three blockchain-related trademark requests for smartphones.

Based on the descriptions provided by the company, the three European trademark requests relate to providing crypto custody services on smartphones, which indicates that Samsung may be planning to make its entry into the ‘blockchain smartphone’ market following the recent release of HTC’s Exodus 1 and Sirin Labs’ FINNEY, both of which also offer crypto custody.

Dutch tech news blog Galaxy Club reports that the three requested patents are called ‘Blockchain KeyStore‘, ‘Blockchain key box‘ and ‘Blockchain Core‘ – names that clearly hint at the direction the world’s largest smartphone maker is taking. The timing of the news again underlines the fact that despite the well-documented woes of the crypto market in 2018, a number of influential businesses like Samsung and HTC believe that cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology will be key growth drivers going forward, and are investing accordingly.

Samsung Betting on Crypto?

Citing an unnamed source in its report, Galaxy Club claims that Samsung is planning to release more information about its interest in developing a range of smartphones with specialist cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality as part of the company’s ongoing mini crypto pivot.

In July, CCN reported that Joel Snyder, a senior IT consultant, a contributor to Samsung Insights published a paper revealing that for the purpose of crypto storage, smartphones offer significant security advantages over laptops and other devices because of the existence of Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) which isolates execution from internal memory, making it close to impossible for hackers to steal data such as crypto wallet private keys.

In line with this, Samsung may be gambling on the adoption of cryptocurrencies as the next big user evolution that will drive sales of its smartphones. Indeed the descriptions provided in the trademark request directly allude to its intention to build blockchain related solutions for mobile devices. For now it is unknown whether Samsung intends to offer these services on any of its upcoming models such as the Galaxy S10 which is set to launch soon.

The trademark requests bring up a busy year of cryptocurrency-related activities for the South Korean conglomerate, which has not been put off by the difficult year for investors. In September, CCN reported that Samsung signed a deal with Canadian bitcoin mining company Squire to design and manufacture new ASIC chips for their operations which would enable them compete against Bitmain’s Antminer series.

Source: https://www.ccn.com/samsung-files-for-cryptocurrency-trademarks-in-the-eu-for-smartphones/

491
Cryptocurrency discussions / ICOs In the Hands of Regulators or Innovators?
« on: December 12, 2018, 11:28:17 AM »
2019 will be a make or break year for Initial Coin Offerings. It appears to me that the future of ICOs entirely depends on the hands of regulators now.
Please read this article https://www.coindesk.com/the-future-of-icos-in-the-hands-of-regulators-or-innovators then share your opinion.

Quote


What is the future of initial coin offerings (ICOs) as we look to a 12-month horizon?

As an early supporter of ICOs (properly run), I’d like to offer a broad perspective on where I think we are, and where we are going. Just as bitcoin and blockchain-based cryptocurrencies challenged our traditional views of money and its movements, ICOs should make us question three well-entrenched sectors: venture capital, public finance and entrepreneurship.

That’s a tall order for a concept that is barely two years old in actual practice.

The Regulatory Questions
For each of these three sectors, ICOs have encountered the headwinds of change, but the most critical friction comes from regulators. If regulators continue to perceive ICOs as nothing more than a securities offering, that stance poses a real threat to the emancipation of the ICO market. The emancipation that is needed is not so much of the quantitative kind (number of ICOs and amounts raised), but rather of the qualitative nature (i.e. reflecting innovative uses of tokens that empower companies to embed them into their business models).

A few months ago, via a speech by one of its commissioners, the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) gave a sliver of hope to the viability of tokens. When the network on which the functioning token or coin is sufficiently decentralized, the SEC said the underlying token is not a security, because the existing U.S. Securities Act regime adds little value, due to the lack of central actors.

But there is no point rejoicing about that statement because the SEC offered no path to get to that stage, other than to start creating tokens as a security.

To date, the SEC has publicly recognized only two such tokens as not securities: bitcoin and ethereum. While this was a positive development, it leaves a huge cloud of doubt and uncertainty over the many other bonafide tokens that deserve a similar acknowledgement.

Realistically, decentralization alone is not a sufficient checkmark for a laissez-faire regulatory attitude. Heeding the SEC position, some token issuers have been going out of their way to lower their “central actor” role in order to remain in that classification box. The sad part of that direction is that prematurely decentralizing governance can actually hurt proper management of a given technology more than benefit it. Projects that are still in the development stages can become disjointed and lose progress efficiency when they are not centrally managed.

Actual token usage by real users is arguably more pertinent to labelling the role of a token as a non-security, whether the governance is central or not. It is the network’s decentralization aspect itself that is the primordial factor, so why cripple those who are attempting to implement decentralization too early?

Every token is inherently a currency of sorts, or a right to some action.

It can be earned via mining a network, validating a transaction, or doing some human work, or sharing data, and it can be spent accordingly in return for a variety of services, both of technical and non-technical natures. A token is therefore effectively a medium of exchange for services between consumers and developers alike.

The Promise of Innovation
What is at stake here? Nothing less than the role of the token as a key innovative model for the blockchain economy.

The token as a decentralized utility is essentially needed, but not all tokens can be born as a security. It would be disastrous to the blockchain industry if we labelled utility tokens as securities when the primary ownership intent is one of usage, not profits. Labeling a token as a security at birth or even during the development and product-to-market fit evolutions restricts their movements, especially the efforts of putting them in the hands of consumers and developers who want to use them.

That can kill innovation that is begging to experiment with token functionality.

Going the securities route to escape regulatory scrutiny is like hiding under a rock. Yes, you can be regulatory compliant but your token still needs to prove its utility, gain adoption and have a defensible business model. If you don’t, users who followed you can still lose a lot of money. So, complying is not a bullet-proof way to consumer protection.

There can be numerous approaches for consumer protection, only if there is a willingness to be open minded and patient enough to let the models bear their fruit. Innovation is restricted when it is boxed within the same set of regulatory confines that were devised many technology generations ago. Just as the Securities Act adapted to online trading, it must adapt and bend to accept the realities of the blockchain’s new paradigm.

An ICO is only the beginning of the journey, and not an exploit in of itself. Reaching the right token-to-market fit stage takes time, just as product-to-market fit iterations take time to perfect in tech startups.

Birthing an alternative funding system is complicated and takes some iterations including practice dances and mis-steps with regulators. Maybe the first generation of ICOs can be iterated upon, but ICOs 2.0 want a fair chance for success.

The elephant in the room are the regulators, and that room is full of china today. They could wreak havoc in it, or they can allow it to prosper by staying outside the room, monitoring results and inflows, while not getting involved in the sausage-making itself as long as what comes out is valuable, innovative, lawful, ethical and real.

If all tokens were labelled as securities, then consumers could not easily use them, and that would be a tragedy. This is an existential position for the future of the ICO and it is intricately tied to the classification of tokens as a new asset class due to its inherently new properties.

Granted, we don’t have so many examples of tokens being used as a widespread utility, but once we do, we will look back and be astonished that we were fighting the trend.

I am optimistic that the long-term prospects of cryptocurrency in the U.S. are good, but the short-to-medium term may not be. Let us not erect so many bumps along that road.

I predict that 2019 will be the year where, at least in the U.S., the SEC and the blockchain industry will come head to head. The industry will challenge the SEC’s ultra-conservative stance on the looseness of their interpretation of the Securities Act as far as applying them to good ICOs and token use cases.

The regulators could end-up governing the future of ICOs if they keep their old lenses, but we shouldn’t let them. Regulators are supposed to be reactive to innovation and not stifle it before it is born. They are supposed to follow the market, not preempt it with early shots.

Let us hope that entrepreneurs and the industry they represent are the ones leading by example, and showing the way to the future of ICOs and the innovative token models they engender.

492
Bitcoin News & Updates / Bitcoin Miners moving to Iran?
« on: December 12, 2018, 11:21:37 AM »
Cheap Power Is Luring Battered Bitcoin Miners to Iran



While some bitcoin miners are estimated to have shut down hundreds of thousands of machines – if not more – others are still out there looking for alternative ways to keep operating.

And it’s Iran, with its extremely low-cost electricity (that can go as low as $0.006 per kilowatt-hour) that’s luring overseas miners. But as attractive as it appears, the journey to setting up shop in Iran isn’t turning out to be a simple one.

Bitcoin mining is, in effect, a kind of energy arbitrage. Miners make their money when the cost of producing coins – currently 12.5 bitcoins per transaction block, plus any fees they’ve accrued – is lower than the operation of the mine itself, including electricity.

Nima Dehqan, a blockchain researcher at a Tehran-based crypto startup Areatak, told CoinDesk that the firm has been meeting with foreign investors that are looking to attempt just that by mining in Iran.

“We have had investors visiting our farms from Spain, Ukraine, Armenia, France,” he said.

Dehqan added that his firm has signed a deal with investors in Spain to set up local mines, a process that will consist of three phases.

“First is sort of a just-to-make-sure testing phase, which is already in place. Second is building new infrastructures together, which somehow has already started, too. And the third will be gathering more investors from outside of Iran,” he explained.

Dehqan said investors are attracted the cheap electricity, which, depending on the actual source of power, can usually go well below $0.01 per kilowatt-hour. And his firm can run facilities at different scales, from two-to-three-megawatts small farms, to higher amounts like 10 – 20 megawatts.

He said while the electricity cost in Iran has always been relatively low, the recent significant devaluation of the Iranian rial – partially due to the recent sanctions by the U.S. government – has made the opportunities even more appealing.

Secret shift

There’s even evidence to suggest miners in countries commonly seen as bitcoin mining powerhouses – China in particular – are looking at Iran for potential opportunities.

Compared to the numbers cited by Dehqan, electricity provided by hydropower stations in China’s southwestern region usually costs around 0.15 yuan – or about $0.02 per kilowatt-hour – in the summer when water is abundant. When winter comes, the cost could go up to $0.04 per kilowatt-hour.

It appears that some Chinese miners have already made the move. A startup based in Chengdu, China, told CoinDesk under the condition of anonymity for fear of government reprisal that it has already deployed 2,000 miners in Iran.

“Iran has vast natural gas resources and thus the electricity cost can be as low as 0.04 yuan [$0.006] per kilowatt-hour. But Iran doesn’t really have any firm making miners. Now that secondhand miners are being sold cheaply in China, it’s a rather reasonable business decision. With electricity that cheap, you can generate profits in one to two months,” the company said in a statement.

Javad Sedighi, a self-employed cryptocurrency miner in Iran, echoed that point, telling CoinDesk that local miners largely rely on the import of machines to the country.

“[That’s] because there are no companies, like Bitmain, [shipping equipment] to Iran. In the past few months, there have been intermediary companies [being] established in Iran that carry out the import of the machines,” Sedighi said, adding:

“I think this is done by people who have a lot of power and money. And it’s done secretly.”

That kind of potential – particularly for very cheap power – has even caught the attention of notable Chinese bitcoin millionaires like Chandler Hongcai Guo. On Oct. 26, Guo posted a video on his Weibo account, telling a group of audience that there’s a huge opportunity in Iran where electricity cost can go well below $0.01 kilowatt-hour.

“It’s suitable for hosting secondhand miners that are on the edge of shutting down in China and can make profits in one to two months,” he was recorded as saying, and asked interested miners to visit Iran to do their own due diligence.

No simple paths to entry

But in conversation with CoinDesk, Dehqan sought to temper the idea that miners are rushing into Iran en-masse since the methods by which foreign investors can set up mining facilities are anything but simple.

The Chinese miner that has set up 2,000 machines said one major hurdle for outsiders is to get miners inside the country to begin with, let alone establishing partnerships with local farms.

The company explained that, currently, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – a branch of the country’s military – still has significant sway on the border. Simply put, they have the power to decide which shipments come in and which ones do not.

“There’s the risk of miners being detained and confiscated at the border. While some logistic companies may have an insurance policy to cover the loss but you can only get compensated by fiat and miners will be gone,” the firm said, adding:

“It’s still very risky. Even though we also try to act as an agent to help other miners go overseas, many of them remain hesitant.”

Dehqan echoed that point and added it’s not so easy to import miners into Iran and some special shipping procedures are necessary.

Sanction complications

And it’s not just internal pressures like border security that are proving to be barriers to would-be investors. Indeed, there’s one particular figure – U.S. President Donald Trump – who has thrown some wrenches into the proverbial gears.

As it stands, current U.S. sanctions have further deterred potential investors that have ties to the world’s largest economy. Guo, who owns a mansion in California, told CoinDesk via WeChat that while he agrees the opportunity is very attractive now that the bitcoin mining difficulty and the overall network hash rate have both dropped significantly, investors like him would not dare to become involved.

“I didn’t go visit myself, considering that the U.S. has imposed the economic sanctions on Iran,” he said, alluding to recent news that the chief financial officer of Huawei was arrested in Canada for alleged involvement in sanctions fraud.

“Most of the mining giants in China, or miner makers, do not dare to host their machines in Iran. This is the general situation. As attractive as the electricity over there might be, only miners at an individual or much smaller scale are shifting to Iran. Most people are still hesitant.” Guo said.

On Aug. 6, the Trump administration announced it would re-impose sanctions on Iran starting from Aug. 7 after withdrawing from a nuclear agreement the U.S. government first entered in 2015. However, the European Union, Russia and China have been reportedly seeking to uphold the agreement to allow businesses and financial transactions to continue with Iran.

According to Sedighi, cryptocurrency mining in Iran itself is still a legal grey area, which means that it’s neither entirely legal or illegal.

“The rules of the mining industry in Iran have not been approved by Parliament. But it is in hand,” he said. “In Iran, like the rest of the industry, you do not have a license to operate. For example, you can not get a bank loan.”

To that effect, Sedighi said the local crypto community is working together to push Iranian lawmakers to pass a formal law that would protect the mining industry, thus enabling it to attract capital and grow.

“We believe that political disagreements between governments should not harm the people,” he said, concluding:

“There have been very much talks about sanctions, as well as methods that should be used by the Iranian crypto society to avoid harming sanctions.”

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/cheap-power-lures-crypto-miners-to-iran-but-its-not-as-easy-as-it-sounds

493


Germany-based crypto payments startup Bitwala is now offering crypto banking services in the country.

Claiming the launch is Europe’s first such banking solution, the firm announced Wednesday the service becomes available via a partnership with local fintech firm SolarisBank that has a banking license and thus is fully regulated.

Users can now manage both bitcoin and euro deposits in one place with the “safety and convenience” of the German bank account, Bitwala said. Accounts and debit cards are free, though it charges a one-percent transaction fee for trading bitcoin.

Euro deposits of up to €100,000 (or $113,257) are protected by local laws like any other traditional bank accounts in Germany, the firm added.

Jan Goslicki, Bitwala’s chief compliance officer and co-founder, said:
Quote
We were able to bring cryptocurrencies into a fully compliant banking setup regulated in Germany. This shows that cryptocurrencies can fit into regulatory frameworks which protect consumers and ultimately inspire trust.

The firm said it has started on-boarding 40,000 customers who pre-registered for the service and will be accepting new users with immediate effect.

Customers will also be able to use their Bitwala crypto accounts to receive salaries, pay rent and trade bitcoin, according to Bitwala’s chief financial officer Christoph Iwaniez.

The crypto banking service was first scheduled to launch last month after Bitwala announced the SolarisBank partnership back in October. The startup said at the time that it hoped to launch its own bank one day and was planning to apply for a German banking license next year.

Bitwala raised $4.5 million in September from venture capital firms Earlybird and Coparion to develop its banking services.

Back in June, Goldman Sachs-backed crypto startup Circle was also seeking to register as a federally licensed bank in the U.S.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/payments-startup-bitwala-now-offers-crypto-banking-in-germany

494


Japanese prosecutors are seeking a 10-year sentence for Mark Karpeles, the former chief executive officer of now-bankrupt bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox.

According to a report from The Mainichi on Wednesday, prosecutors claimed at the Tokyo District Court that Karpeles used customers’ funds for his own personal use.

He reportedly transferred 341 million yen (or $3 million) of customers’ money kept in an Mt. Gox bank account to his personal account during September–December 2013, according to a court indictment. They cash, they said, was taken for uses such as “investing in a software development business for personal interest.”

Karpeles is also accused of manipulating the data on Mt. Gox’s trading system to fabricate the balance and playing a great role in “totally destroying the confidence of bitcoin users.”

Back in 2017, Karpeles pleaded not guilty in the court to the charges of embezzlement and data manipulation, and he also denied such allegations at the time.

Later in April of this year, he apologized for the company’s bankruptcy, stating, “I never imagined things would end this way and I am forever sorry for everything that’s taken place and all the effect it had on everyone involved.”

Mt. Gox officially filed for liquidation in April 2014 after claiming to have been hacked for 850,000 bitcoin, some of which was later found.

The case has been ongoing since then. In July 2018, creditors had a victory when the court issued an order approving a petition to begin civil rehabilitation.

Last month, the trustee of Mt. Gox, Nobuaki Kobayashi was seeking to extend the deadline for filing civil rehabilitation claims to December from the earlier deadline of October.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/10-year-jail-term-sought-for-former-mt-gox-ceo-mark-karpeles

495
Bitcoin Forum / Not Everyone Wants a Bitcoin ETF
« on: December 11, 2018, 01:03:14 PM »
While many believe that a Bitcoin ETF could trigger a rally, some early supporters and veterans are not really that impressed. Well, to each his/her own but I think ETF will increase liquidity of Bitcoin and the market in general.

Here's the article from Coindesk: https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoiners-bitcoin-etf-crypto

Quote
While many traders eagerly await a potential bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), some of the cryptocurrency’s most passionate advocates are lukewarm at best about the prospect of such an instrument.

Twitter is flush with users like crypto entrepreneur Jonathan Hamel posting about how an ETF would bring an “epic” inflow of institutional capital to the ecosystem – that is, “billions” of dollars in new investments.

But if you talk to early adopters and veteran technologists in the bitcoin community, you’ll hear resounding indifference, if not queasiness.

“I don’t think an ETF is going to be some kind of massive magnet,” Pierre Rochard, founder of the Brooklyn-based Bitcoin Advisory LLC, told CoinDesk. “Substantively, it’s really not that much different than fractional reserve banking.”

Last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange postponed plans to reevaluate ETF proposals from financial institutions such as VanEck and SolidX to as late as February 27, 2019. This means two more months of nail-biting for those who believe the ETF would be a huge boon to bitcoin or the savior of the overall crypto marketplace.

And yet, in reference to Grayscale’s Bitcoin Investment Trust, which launched in 2015, bitcoin analyst Nik Bhatia told CoinDesk:

Quote
“I don’t see the additional ETFs improving bitcoin’s liquidity any more than the GBTC already does.”

Although Bhatia said he would nevertheless welcome a regulator-approved ETF because it might increase public trust in this new asset class, some crypto veterans went as far as to say an ETF could actually be harmful to the broader ecosystem. To them, an ETF contradicts the vision of a peer-to-peer financial network fueled by self-custodied assets.

“It’s kind of a centralizing force and the value proposition of bitcoin is it’s decentralized, global,” Lightning Labs developer Alex Bosworth told CoinDesk.

Centralizing force

For Bosworth, the biggest risk that a bitcoin ETF presents is that it might incentivize institutions to work collectively to influence the ecosystem.

Referring to the thwarted New York Agreement in 2017 – when leading crypto companies planned to support unpopular bitcoin network updates simultaneously despite public outcry – Bosworth explained:

Quote
“We saw companies that are custodians for other people’s coins, talking as if they hold those coins and take actions that decide, on behalf of their users, without even consulting them…We don’t want to have central parties out there negotiating for fundamental rule changes in bitcoin.”

This is the same reason that bitcoin veteran Christopher Allen, the former principal architect at Blockstream, distrusts the institutions that are working to create a regulated bitcoin ETF.

“The real reason they are doing it is they can play financial games to make them a much higher interest rate than what they would otherwise,” Allen told CoinDesk. “I think there are a lot of implications of that. How do we educate people on what fiduciary responsibility and custody really is?”

Bhatia agreed that the industry is transitioning to prioritize a “trusted custody model,” but doesn’t think such institutional products will have a significant impact on cypherpunk traditionalists.

“People that currently store their own bitcoin aren’t going to rush into the ETF because they’re not looking for the same things,” he said.

Don’t hold your breath
Other bitcoin veterans are concerned retail investors are putting more faith in an ETF’s ability to rescue sinking cryptocurrency prices than the prospective product actually deserves.

If approved in the near future, Rochard said, he expects bitcoin ETFs would make up an even smaller percentage of the market than gold ETFs, which he estimated represent less than 2 percent of the global gold supply.

“We’re talking about a very niche part of the market that would be interested in a bitcoin ETF product,” Rochard said. “It would be even less than gold is used in an ETF because the overall settlement cost of bitcoin is lower than those of physically settling gold.”

Others say any boost to the price might be short-lived.

During CoinDesk’s Consensus: Invest conference in November, BlockTower Capital’s chief investment officer Ari Paul warned the audience to recall how the addition of bitcoin futures boosted short-term speculation far more than institutional commitment. The price settled back down within months.

“If an ETF was launched, it’s not that there would suddenly be massive institutional flows. I think on the announcement you’d get a massive rally,” Paul said. “That’s not because you suddenly get $50 million [in] institutional investors’ money, it’s because speculators price it in.”

And it’s important to remember that any euphoria (or anxiety) about a bitcoin ETF is still academic.

On December 5, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce told the audience during fireside chat in Washington D.C. not to “hold your breath,” because a regulator-approved bitcoin ETF could still be years away. She added:

Quote
“I do caution people to not live or die on when a crypto or bitcoin ETF gets approved.”

Operational questions

Even if an ETF were to be approved, bitcoin advocates question how this structure – in which a fund owns underlying assets and divides ownership of them into shares – would address the idiosyncrasies of cryptocurrency.

For example, what if there’s another fork of the network, like the one that create bitcoin cash last year?

“Do they [ETF custodians] give the coins back to people or do they suddenly become an index fund?” Rochard said. “I don’t think there’s a precedent at all [from capital markets], because bitcoin doesn’t have a legal identity and corporations do.”

Allen said ETF issuers would need to clarify how they store and tally their bitcoin, so that products representing this underlying assets wouldn’t be loaned out over and over in a process called rehypothecation. As Caitlin Long, co-founder of the Wyoming Blockchain Coalition, wrote in a Forbes column, rehypothecation is antithetical to the bitcoin ethos because there is a finite bitcoin supply, 21 million at max.

As such, there’s no way to bail out lenders if borrowers were owed more bitcoin than the ETF-issuer actually possessed.

However, Gabor Gurbacs, the director of digital asset strategy for VanEck, told CoinDesk his company’s proposal would involve cold storage, daily disclosures to defuse any concerns about rehypothecation, and a handbook of regulator-approved index fund procedures to follow in the case of a bitcoin fork.

“We intend to stay true to the core tenets of bitcoin,” Gurbacs said, adding that ETF holders would be primarily exposed to the asset defined by Bitcoin Core unless another chain became dominant and equally secure.

“I don’t see any operational issues. I think we’ve figured it out and we’re waiting for the regulators to make a decision on this,” he went on to explain.

Like many bitcoin advocates, Rochard said that anything which boosts bitcoin’s overall liquidity – even modestly – is a good thing.

On the other hand, he sympathized with the skeptical indifference many technologists feel toward financial institutions.

“It would be really unfortunate if people lose sight of why bitcoin has value,” Rochard said. “But it would be such a small part of the market, so there’d be limited impact on that.”

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35
ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod