I find it hard to believe banks agreed to that. Credit cards are their bread. I dont believe that banks on freewill agreed to receive less profit from clients. It is like having a night bar but refuse to sell alcohol after 21:00.

And yet bars agreed to close earlier in some countries, pubs and restaurants agreed on smoking bans, tv stations agreed on bans on betting and tobacco, I don't understand what's the surprise here, there are a lot of banks that don't like even deposits on betting website from debit cards, it's nothing unheard of!

Plus if you think it's such an attractive industry for them would you loan money to a gambling addict?
I'm betting (pun!) they have a ton of credit defaults from gamblers, enough to offset the interests.

And somebody believe that this ban would really help? Arent gamblers and addicted gamblers one of the creative persons that happen to find money for gambling no matter what? Imo with this move, Australia has stimulated grey economy. Now gambler would still use credit cards, but this time to buy goods, then re-sell them for fiat and place bets. Very smart Australia.

Common, you really think it's that easy?
If we go by this logic we shouldn't prohibit anything because people find a loophole.

One major problem that is mitigated is that the user doesn't have access to a credit line immediately, to gamble on impulse because he has lost, he will need to purchase something, wait for the delivery, sell the thing, load a debit card...it will be a lot of time in which he can calm down and not rush to empty his whole credit line on the next bet!

I cant even realize how this is going to work. How can casinos know when the user is using a credit card, issues by Australian bank to deposit, and not a deposit card. Or how can Australian casinos tell who is a local and who is a foreigner.

The cc number tells the processing party everything about you, what type of card you have, who issued it, who is the owner, and so on, it's so simple for them to filter this it will be the last problem.
As for the card in another country id doesn't matter, If you're KYCed as an Aussie then you will have no way of using a cc.

I guess we all know what this is about  . Nowadays GPU isn't really cheap as it seemed before
Some articles say that GPU parts are becoming more expensive and resulting in more shortages, due to its powerful specs. And it's making it harder to get the high performance computing power we need for everything from AI research to gaming. 
Do you guys think that decentralized GPU cloud infrastructure can stop this from happening by leveraging the power of idle GPUs from every individual?

AI learning and gaming are different things.
A 4090 will outclass a H100 in gaming, if we talk FP8 the difference starts being counted in order of magnitude, if we add the existence of NVlink which is present on consumer GPU and allows insane scalability without loss it's pretty hard to compete on, even if we talk 24/7 usage but who is going to let his GPU run all day at full throttle? Not to mention that lately, fewer and fewer people use a desktop and more a laptop which adds to the problems.

Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to clarify some misunderstandings about Bitcoin Quantum (BTQ).

Nobody here misunderstood anything about your quantum things or any other thing, our concerns were with 1/7 of the supply having been mined by you and that you will hold (unless you already sold) even in 12 years from now half of the mined coins, so if you compare it with Bitcoin you have at least 3 times more coins than Satoshi despite a 10x lower supply generation.

And again with the wall of text, you managed to avoid answering the questions while claiming transparency!

if quantum and AI are combined, then SHA-256 is easy problem.

AI is actually powered by the current information we have, so it's not like it can invent something we haven't tried since it doesn't have the knowledge for that, also even if an AI model would be able to cancel bad effects such as noise, it can't solve the physical problems of quantum computers.

Yes, we conducted a pre-mine, and 3,000,000 BTQ were allocated for the foundation and marketing, which are used for listing on exchanges. The remaining pre-mined coins are reserved for airdrops and marketing activities.

And you never mentioned this anywhere, not on your website, not on your whitepaper, you mined 1/7 of the total supply and more than 12 years of mining!!!! for, airdrop promotion! Common!
You knew the whole pre-mining thing is frowned upon by every miner or investor and you hid that willingly!

Then you claim "transparency"! How can you claim transparency when you didn't tell anyone that 12 years from now on you will still own half of all the mined coins?

Question:
How did you manage with 76252 bocks and 0.57 reward to get 3,043,543.58 mined coins?
All according to your explorer!

So, unless it was pre-mined how does the math work for this?

In the end, it will turn out that the man actually has nothing and that he is a victim of a system that persecutes him because he thinks he is someone else. Can the whole story go in the direction of proving unaccountability in order to avoid all possible legal consequences?

Impossible in CW case since he initiated lawsuits on these claims, he has no chance, his only way out of this is bankruptcy!

UK judge already anticipate that by freezing some craig asset few months ago. The amount should be enough to cover 85% of COPA legal bill.

Source, https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/03/29/uk-judge-freezes-craig-wright-assets-to-prevent-him-evading-court-costs/.

He has issued an order on freezing his assets, but this doesn't mean he has the assets to cover that, and even so, COPA will have to wait in line because CW already has to pay 100 million awarded against  W&K  and he still hasn't paid that up.
I still don't think CW has the money to pay up, and these two are not all his lawsuits right now!

Although I feel long or running games could serve as a way to mitigate the amount of risks involved in a single slip, so it's really not a bad idea.

If the first match is a loss then all of it's gone just as with any bet!
The duration and the spread between the choices make little impact, so unless you have some info that would make the odds go down before the match you could cash out the first minute by taking advantage of the odds change there is nothing seriously at play here.

So unless you can't pick 10 bets from today and your target is a big ticket return there is little reason for it.

If I'm understanding correctly then the service provider has everyone's ID and so they can just place them on an FBI most wanted list or on INTERPOL. That's why you don't do malicious things after you've been ID'd.

If those are their IDs at all.
All KYC does is make sure that there is a guy named XY with a valid ID that poses as XY, and nothing else, but at no point can they make sure that it's not somebody else using the account and that XY hasn't been paid 100$ in a parking lot to do that KYC.
Plus it would not be the first time when the team was the one fully legit but the guy in charge was someone who nobody knew personally and stayed always in the shadows.