Quote from: Bobcrypto on April 29, 2025, 08:24:06 PM

Quote from: enwi on April 29, 2025, 06:18:22 PM

Quote from: yohananaomi on April 28, 2025, 01:44:06 AM

I think I have to agree with what you said because Binance's influence is very large on BNB, so investors' trust in BNB will always be maintained well and never let go of the grip that has been done so far.
It is clear that Binance will always give the best for BNB because Binance's reputation is there. If BNB falls, then the one who gets a bad reputation is Binance itself.

It is true that BNB and Binance are very closely linked, but behind this is something people often do not take into account. This is when one company dominates various sectors of the ecosystem which may lead to the limited space for manoeuvre. Thanks to being associated with Binance, BNB benefits from all of these aspects but also, if something goes wrong on one side, the matter will quickly affect the other side. Hence, it is high time that even if big names like BNB are created, it should also offer proper utility and worth in the market. If it is desired to have this system insulated from such shocks in the future, then the dependency has to come hand in hand with innovation that will sustain it.

BNB is not just linked with Binance exchange alone, BNB is the native token of the Binance Smart chain network plus the exchange. You see, the potential of the BNB token cannot be overemphasized or underemphasized, it is one of the best project, and an open opportunity for Investors any day.
Remember, Binance is the largest exchange in the world based on 24/hour trading volumes, a proven facts that they also have the largest community of users globally. BNB is always a big attraction to many investors both old and new in my opinion.

The reality is that it is indeed not difficult to be separated between Binance and BNB, because they are one entity that is always attached side by side.
You are right that BNB is the one that has great potential at this time and can never be separated from so many investors who always hold and trade because it always gives good results for its holders.
With Binance continuing to support BNB, it is certain that many old or new investors will continue to trade with BNB, because it is certain that it will be able to generate profits.

BNB is a coin that is still in great demand by investors, it is true that binance as the largest exchange always supports BNB. In addition, the BSC network is still widely used by users as transactions and several projects still use this network. Although solana as a new network is increasingly popular, BSC still survives.

The question posed by the OP have been ringing in the mind of many Bitcoiners since the recent widespread adoption by different institutions in the world. Greater global adoption of Bitcoin off course is one of the factors that could reduce the volatility of Bitcoin but it'll surely not make it disappear.

 As Bitcoin continue to mature, volatility is expected to decline but it is very likely retain some due to some of it's distinctive properties as well as it's role as a decentralized alternative to conventional fiat

Bitcoin volatility will always exist, because that is the character of the crypto market. Even if many people have adopted bitcoin, it is likely that whakes will continue to play their role in the market and make the price of bitcoin volatile so they can profit from the price difference. But maybe if there are many bitcoin investors and it becomes more popular, it is likely that bitcoin will be more stable

In 2013, the US government introduced some policies and regulations that limited the use of Bitcoin as it was then labelled as "tool for criminals". Fast-forward to 12 years later, they same government have not just made new policies that encourages Bitcoin but have also invested in it through the Bitcoin Reserve. If the most powerful government in the world can adopt Bitcoin after initially kicking against it, you should draw your conclusions from there to know that Bitcoin in the future will be too global for EU not to adopt it. Personally, I feel it's just a matter of time for EU and other powerful governmental bodies to adopt Bitcoin.

I think in the future, countries that used to ban bitcoin will accept and adopt bitcoin. As you said, the US used to be against bitcoin and now the US government has made bitcoin a strategic reserve fund. And I think other countries will follow what the US government is doing soon.

Quote from: Mia Chloe on April 17, 2025, 07:55:08 PM

Ohh I see. Anyways a coin or token being listed on coin gecko really doesn't tell a hundred percent that it will hold up. Sometimes these platforms mainly focus on checking if that meme is a scam one and if it's on a secured network.
Unlike some other sites you see coins with even an incomplete elliptic curve being listed mostly because of hype and it's where some degen traders carry out snipping.

Once the memecoin nature of a token has been identified, we also shouldn't have overly high expectations for that token. It has very little chance of becoming as big as DOGE, SHIB, PEPE, or BONK, while the risk of being forgotten is very high, similar to millions of other memecoins in this market.

Investors, please be cautious with memecoins. They may be appealing, but they come with extremely high risks. We should use capital wisely instead of throwing it into memecoins like a game of chance. Luck doesn't last as long as the results of skillful project analysis and token selection!

That's right, meme coins are an interesting investment but the risk is very high. If I personally invest in meme coins but with a small capital because I don't want to lose much if the coin doesn't match expectations.
for those who have a lot of experience investing in meme coins and have good analysis and [prediction, they might be able to get big profits,

Quote from: Bobcrypto on April 23, 2025, 09:26:28 PM

Quote from: Gurujebs on April 07, 2025, 11:08:22 PM

Quote from: TBaaddi on March 02, 2025, 12:05:02 AM

They are unstoppable. Monero is currently experiencing the kind of state and corporate oppression that Bitcoin faced around 2015.

It will work about as well as that did.

Bitcoin isn't a privacy coin and it's not been used to launder money while the perpetrators hide under it and because it was becoming difficult for the government to track them, the government forced the centralized exchanges to delist it. If you see Montero trading on any tier A exchange, consider it a ticking time bomb because it will soon be dlisted.

Privacy coins are good by the way but they are too private that government don't know anything about sender and receiver, they have to completely let it go unlike Bitcoin where you can have some level of privacy but you can't do bad things underneath because it's not completely private.

Yes, privacy coins are really hard for the government to track, and that is One of the reasons they have ben clamping down on them through the CEX exchanges. Monero, Dash, and others privacy coins can hardly been seen on centralized exchange because of pressure from governments.
I think that privacy will continue to exist, it will be very difficult for government close them completely, the most challenges factor  is poor investing and trading opportunities. I just hope this challenge can be overcome in near future.

And with that, we shouldn't look for privacy coins as some form of investment and I think they are those who investors will shy away. And those who are using it is for privacy, not that they are doing anything wrong and hiding something, but for us crypto enthusiast, we want to remain private and anonymous so that no one can track our movement. And this is the basic tenant on why privacy coins are still surviving up to this day even though it has been crack down since 2018.

I never keep privacy coins, but only use them for transactions that I consider safer using private coins. even though it is not illegal activities, anonymity is also sometimes needed in our transactions. so there are many considerations that I have to do in making transactions.

It is recently that I am discovered that USDC and USDT are two different stable coins. I was using the both to sell coins and the amounts were the same price and if there is any different it was like $0.0003 so I was not feeling the impact. It was recently that I sent USDC to someone and the person converted it to USDT and they cut almost 2$ then and I USDT is slightly superior to USDC but they are all in the same category. Whenever USDT moves up and down USDC also follow.

I also use both stable coins, USDT and USDC. The price difference is not that big. So I think both are commonly used.
However, I do like using USDT, because I am more familiar with it during crypto market transactions, especially CEX.
So honestly I don't think there is a big difference between the two.

Indeed, we cannot avoid the trust of its holders, because all invest because of that trust, and we know that BNB is supported by Binance, whose reputation is unavoidably very good until now with its community, which is also very large.
Right as you said that Binance will continue to strive so that BNB can be a trust to be used as an investment in doing various ways so that innovation so that BNB can be the best until now.

BNB supported by binance provides confidence for investors, because so far as a binance exchange user I feel satisfied and my assets are safe there. I spend a lot of time on binance because I do more trading there.
BNB is still a trusted coin and binance always keeps this coin from falling with the IEO program, one of them