It’s actually a very good idea to try and make changes to our current education system and include cryptocurrency as part of the curriculum and also other things that have become archaic - but the issue now is that the government are being greedy with salary because I’m sure that anyone who would want to take this class won’t agree with the current teacher salary and that would make them go for quacks like we have in most schools for most courses or lecturers - and in the end it will be the same thing, students will go to school and still not be able to get anything done in the real world.

Yes, the government being greedy won't want to make an increment in the salary of people who will render these services. Those who have the knowledge on things related to cryptocurrency knows the value of what they are about to give out and will require good renumeration from the government. It is in the nature of our educational system that getting the best and paying them well so as to obtain good result is a problem. The world is evolving; we are still stagnant in our educational system.

Is it a right thing to teach and impact the knowledge of Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in the school system of the country or we just have to continue with the already existing methods of going to school and learning same syllabus that has been used for decades, with no new ideas flowing in. With the same mindset of graduating with good grade and working in some big firm, and receiving salary at the end of the day?
In my years in school, I learnt that we are skilled when it comes to technological knowledge, and I am sure it will be something much better for the younger ones still in school and those coming.

What do you take on this?

Quote from: Stuart on April 29, 2025, 12:03:14 AM

What do you feel between the POS Agents rendering cash services to the masses of the country and the Banks that has been almost as old as the country giving out the money (or will I say, selling the money to these POS Agents). The country has gone so bad to the point of selling our own money to us, both the banks and these POS Agents are making money with our own money.
I feel this is a planned system of taking more money out of the people of the country, with a disguise of rendering services.

Digital/Crypto currencies as forms of investments/trading, which we have found ourselves here into, at the end of the day, when necessity demands, the need for cash to carryout daily activities is required, and we end up with these two.

Do you think the banks brough this POS as a means of generating more money from the mass or a means of rendering better services?

I would like to hear your take on this.

I don’t think the banks are selling money for the citizens cause they never for once said that the ATM machine won’t bring out cash the POS is just an optional means to get money more faster and quick than bank cause sometimes the queue at bank is something else most especially during month end cause many do receive their monthly allowance. So the POS is optional is either you choose to use them or go to the bank where you can take money without paying any extra cash for paying so it left for him or her to make a choice.
  But for real the POS agent are making money but it cause of the economic that even brought about the machine so I don’t blame them after all a man need to survive it better than stealing or fraud. But nowadays they use the pos machine as an act of fraud and scam someone I have been a victim my advise is just make the use of the atm machine so you won’t witness any Discomfort so be safe out there. Stay safe.

Well, the banks won't openly say so, but will like to enquire from you by experience, have you for ones gone to the bank and you want to make withdrawals and you're being told the certain amount that can be dispensed to you, that there is not enough cash available? This issue started during the cashless period we experienced in the country, and which is still on till date in banks. As for the ATM machines, it is only loaded with cash in the morning hours, and at that time, it will be crowded with people, and when the cash is emptied, reloading it up again becomes another problem.

I am not against the POS agents rendering their services, because it was through them, we could get cash during the cashless period, which through them, on several POS points they will say they buy money in the banks to get cash for their work.

Quote from: Rubel007 on April 29, 2025, 02:54:47 PM

Quote from: Sim_card on April 24, 2025, 10:46:03 PM

Gambling is not a skill, therefore, no matter how hard to try to learn it and how experienced that you are, your win still depends on luck and not skill. For every skilled based game, luck is very important to win the game than skill. This is why I don't think that it's important for you to think that you can learn gambling to make profits. Gamble for fun.

Exactly, there is no such strategy in gambling where one can win by applying the strategy. In gambling luck must be given priority. Strategy can be effective for sometimes but not always. If someone wants to increase his skill in gambling and spend a lot of time to win, I think it will not be worthwhile. It is better to leave it to luck and should not expect much.

If you are a professional in poker, your luck would be determined by the cards that you pick when you are playing with a pro like you. However, if you're playing with an amateur is when you can win him as a professional that you are. Online gambling isn't the same because you are playing with the house hedge, where only luck can make you win.

When it is a table rounded with professionals, that is where luck will take a winner, or the kind of cards in possession can make you a winner, which I think is true, as a learner I am (not even up to an amateur). But when a learner/amateur plays with a professional, don't you think luck can still have its way for any of them to win? If the amateur has good cards and the pro doesn't, can the pro still win because he is a pro or luck didn't fall to his side?

If it is on the real-world event, does it take only a pro in poker games to make wins, where tricks and cheats are put together as part of the game techniques?

Quote from: Stuart on April 24, 2025, 01:01:55 PM

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

Despite the banning there are still illegal operators continue to spread their gambling business. My country is waging war against these operations and I am okay with that but I am wondering how serious and presice they are when it comes to those who slips from their regulations they should ban all them them but the problem is that they said it could also hurt the government fund because taxes were gone. I don't think it's the government fund that is affected here but it seems politicians also has shares. 😅

Most countries that are more interested in making money from its people will are the ones that will take a look at the taxes these gambling sites are putting into the country's treasury. Politicians always have a part to play in situations like this, while those who made their money with some dirty touch wants the gambling business to continue so as to stay behind the shadows.

Countries that are most and major concern is for the betterment of its citizens will ban gambling or place a big tax fee on them for them to go away or stay and struggle with the levy placed on them.

So far so good, the ending of the month of April has shown some good market moves, though, having a challenge in breaking the current highs of $95,700K. The month is ending tomorrow, and we might still hold in this price range, till next month. $96k is a very strong resistance at this point. For it to be broken, a high demand/buying will be responsible to break that peak, at a price above $96k, we will be seeing around $100k. 

What do you feel between the POS Agents rendering cash services to the masses of the country and the Banks that has been almost as old as the country giving out the money (or will I say, selling the money to these POS Agents). The country has gone so bad to the point of selling our own money to us, both the banks and these POS Agents are making money with our own money.
I feel this is a planned system of taking more money out of the people of the country, with a disguise of rendering services.

Digital/Crypto currencies as forms of investments/trading, which we have found ourselves here into, at the end of the day, when necessity demands, the need for cash to carryout daily activities is required, and we end up with these two.

Do you think the banks brough this POS as a means of generating more money from the mass or a means of rendering better services?

I would like to hear your take on this.