1
General Discussion / Tax reform in Nigeria
« on: December 02, 2024, 08:10:35 PM »
DEMYSTIFYING THE NEW TAX REFORM BILL IN NIGERIA
_"Nigeria has been inundated by a disturbing record of intractable economic dislocations resulting in economic hardship of acute poverty and hunger, occasioned by the aftermath of fuel subsidy removal, insecurity, wanton corruption, and so on. Any attempt to place more taxes on the people who are yet to recover from the shocks of recent economic policies of the Government especially that of the fuel subsidy removal slammed on the people whose presumed benefits are yet to come to fruition could only be considered as one of greatest misdeeds of any government whose primary responsibility is to ensure the wellbeing of its citizens."_
The recent debate on the pros and cons of the proposed new tax bill which has already been passed for second reading by the National Assembly has generated an excruciating level of heat and pandemonium in the public opinion.
The proponents of the contentious Bill hold the view that the new tax law is necessary for the general overhauling of the Country's tax regime and that if the tax reform is well implemented states are likely going to get more revenues, low-income earners will be exempted from tax, and above all is the organization of the tax collection system which is necessary to promote efficiency and accountability in the tax administration.
However, the opponents of the Bill have raised several concerns about the negative economic impacts the Bill portends especially to the Northern part of the Country despite its presumed merits. Many portions of the Bill according to them are full of fault lines which if not addressed will portend a great deal of danger to the economic survival and wellbeing of many States in the Country.
First of all, there is skepticism from the opponents of the Bill about its overall intent generally. According to them, the Bill has a subtle regional agenda beyond the national one it's painted to achieve. It's a systematic attempt to perniciously surcharge some regions for other states especially Lagos in a more subterranean fashion.
Specifically, looking at Section 77 of the new Bill which talks about the VAT Redistribution Formula; the Section sought a transition to a consumption-based VAT distribution model emphasizing derivation i.e. the location of consumption as against the equitable or population-based VAT redistribution.
This placed Lagos at the edge of advantage above every other state as Lagos currently generates over 50% of Nigeria’s VAT due to its reputation to be the industrial hub of the Country with a high concentration of multinational companies, high retail activities, luxury consumption, real estate, location of commercial and fintech Headquarters and so on.
In addition, the timing of the proposed Bill constitutes another major bond of contention to the objectivity of the Bill. Nigeria continues the be inundated by a disturbing record of intractable economic dislocations resulting in economic hardship of acute poverty and hunger, occasioned by the aftermath of fuel subsidy removal, insecurity, wanton corruption, and so on. Any attempt to place more taxes on the people who are yet to recover from the shocks of recent economic policies of the Government especially that of the fuel subsidy removal slammed on the people whose presumed benefits are yet to come to fruition could only be considered as one of greatest misdeeds of any government whose primary responsibility is to ensure the wellbeing of its citizens.
Academically, this negates the 'principle of Fairness', one of the four core principles of taxation propounded by Adam Smith which not only demands but requires that taxation should be compatible with taxpayers’ conditions, including their ability to pay in line with personal and family needs.
Since this is an executive Bill, it's expected to have a buy-in of all components of the executive arms in the Country. Unfortunately, the Presidency remains adamant and indifferent despite the recommendation of NEC and Northern Governors Forum one of the important components of the executive arm which advised that the Bill be suspended to allow for wider consultations to establish the efficacy of the Bill and amend the contentious portions in it.
Moreover, the kind of energy the Presidency is dispensing to get a sensitive Bill of this nature passed by the National Assembly is enough to provide ground for suspicion from its opponents. The Bill is sadistic in expectation, ruthless in execution, and above all selfish in motive. It's deliberately aimed at hurting innocent citizens and designed to permanently impair the progress of especially the North.
WAYFORWARD
In fairness to the proponents of the Bill, the Bill, without doubt, heralds some degrees of advantages, especially in terms of the reasonable organization of the tax system which the new Bill proposed. However, the concerns raised by the opponents of the Bill are too weighty to be overlooked particularly with regards to the contentious issue of redistribution of VAT based on the derivation model which placed most states on the disadvantaged side.
The Presidency and the proponents of the Bill alike should eschew the monopoly of wisdom and take heed to the advice of NEC, NGF, and other well-meaning Nigerians by withdrawing the Bill from the National Assembly to allow for wider consultations until the contentious clauses of the Bill are either amended or removed.
Alternatively, the Bill can be implemented in phases so that the contentious clauses could subsequently come in other phases after it might have been addressed and agreed upon by all stakeholders.
But most importantly this scenario should serve as a wake-up call and an eye-opener to the Northern states that are largely hit by the new Bill if eventually passed. The Northern states especially our Governors must live up to their responsibilities by genuinely scouting for ways that reduce our overreliance on monies coming from FAAC.
We must bitterly admit that the era of overdependence on monies from FAAC is almost gone and hence, every Northern state should at least put in place a team of economic experts to review its financial policies and also suggest innovative means of broadening its revenue base as well as to seek ways of diversifying their economic activities in line with the current economic realities.
Our Governors must come to terms with the stark reality of the fact that the era of Governors living in opulence with FAAC allocation at the expense of the poor masses is gone. They must be alive to their responsibilities, turn around the economy of their states by implementing reforms that align their states with the current economic realities of the 21st Century, and above all, work for the people. I sincerely believe that we have the wherewithal to do that.
THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR NOISE MAKING, IT'S TIME FOR HARD WORK AND GETTING THE JOB DONE.
_"Nigeria has been inundated by a disturbing record of intractable economic dislocations resulting in economic hardship of acute poverty and hunger, occasioned by the aftermath of fuel subsidy removal, insecurity, wanton corruption, and so on. Any attempt to place more taxes on the people who are yet to recover from the shocks of recent economic policies of the Government especially that of the fuel subsidy removal slammed on the people whose presumed benefits are yet to come to fruition could only be considered as one of greatest misdeeds of any government whose primary responsibility is to ensure the wellbeing of its citizens."_
The recent debate on the pros and cons of the proposed new tax bill which has already been passed for second reading by the National Assembly has generated an excruciating level of heat and pandemonium in the public opinion.
The proponents of the contentious Bill hold the view that the new tax law is necessary for the general overhauling of the Country's tax regime and that if the tax reform is well implemented states are likely going to get more revenues, low-income earners will be exempted from tax, and above all is the organization of the tax collection system which is necessary to promote efficiency and accountability in the tax administration.
However, the opponents of the Bill have raised several concerns about the negative economic impacts the Bill portends especially to the Northern part of the Country despite its presumed merits. Many portions of the Bill according to them are full of fault lines which if not addressed will portend a great deal of danger to the economic survival and wellbeing of many States in the Country.
First of all, there is skepticism from the opponents of the Bill about its overall intent generally. According to them, the Bill has a subtle regional agenda beyond the national one it's painted to achieve. It's a systematic attempt to perniciously surcharge some regions for other states especially Lagos in a more subterranean fashion.
Specifically, looking at Section 77 of the new Bill which talks about the VAT Redistribution Formula; the Section sought a transition to a consumption-based VAT distribution model emphasizing derivation i.e. the location of consumption as against the equitable or population-based VAT redistribution.
This placed Lagos at the edge of advantage above every other state as Lagos currently generates over 50% of Nigeria’s VAT due to its reputation to be the industrial hub of the Country with a high concentration of multinational companies, high retail activities, luxury consumption, real estate, location of commercial and fintech Headquarters and so on.
In addition, the timing of the proposed Bill constitutes another major bond of contention to the objectivity of the Bill. Nigeria continues the be inundated by a disturbing record of intractable economic dislocations resulting in economic hardship of acute poverty and hunger, occasioned by the aftermath of fuel subsidy removal, insecurity, wanton corruption, and so on. Any attempt to place more taxes on the people who are yet to recover from the shocks of recent economic policies of the Government especially that of the fuel subsidy removal slammed on the people whose presumed benefits are yet to come to fruition could only be considered as one of greatest misdeeds of any government whose primary responsibility is to ensure the wellbeing of its citizens.
Academically, this negates the 'principle of Fairness', one of the four core principles of taxation propounded by Adam Smith which not only demands but requires that taxation should be compatible with taxpayers’ conditions, including their ability to pay in line with personal and family needs.
Since this is an executive Bill, it's expected to have a buy-in of all components of the executive arms in the Country. Unfortunately, the Presidency remains adamant and indifferent despite the recommendation of NEC and Northern Governors Forum one of the important components of the executive arm which advised that the Bill be suspended to allow for wider consultations to establish the efficacy of the Bill and amend the contentious portions in it.
Moreover, the kind of energy the Presidency is dispensing to get a sensitive Bill of this nature passed by the National Assembly is enough to provide ground for suspicion from its opponents. The Bill is sadistic in expectation, ruthless in execution, and above all selfish in motive. It's deliberately aimed at hurting innocent citizens and designed to permanently impair the progress of especially the North.
WAYFORWARD
In fairness to the proponents of the Bill, the Bill, without doubt, heralds some degrees of advantages, especially in terms of the reasonable organization of the tax system which the new Bill proposed. However, the concerns raised by the opponents of the Bill are too weighty to be overlooked particularly with regards to the contentious issue of redistribution of VAT based on the derivation model which placed most states on the disadvantaged side.
The Presidency and the proponents of the Bill alike should eschew the monopoly of wisdom and take heed to the advice of NEC, NGF, and other well-meaning Nigerians by withdrawing the Bill from the National Assembly to allow for wider consultations until the contentious clauses of the Bill are either amended or removed.
Alternatively, the Bill can be implemented in phases so that the contentious clauses could subsequently come in other phases after it might have been addressed and agreed upon by all stakeholders.
But most importantly this scenario should serve as a wake-up call and an eye-opener to the Northern states that are largely hit by the new Bill if eventually passed. The Northern states especially our Governors must live up to their responsibilities by genuinely scouting for ways that reduce our overreliance on monies coming from FAAC.
We must bitterly admit that the era of overdependence on monies from FAAC is almost gone and hence, every Northern state should at least put in place a team of economic experts to review its financial policies and also suggest innovative means of broadening its revenue base as well as to seek ways of diversifying their economic activities in line with the current economic realities.
Our Governors must come to terms with the stark reality of the fact that the era of Governors living in opulence with FAAC allocation at the expense of the poor masses is gone. They must be alive to their responsibilities, turn around the economy of their states by implementing reforms that align their states with the current economic realities of the 21st Century, and above all, work for the people. I sincerely believe that we have the wherewithal to do that.
THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR NOISE MAKING, IT'S TIME FOR HARD WORK AND GETTING THE JOB DONE.