With cryptocurrency gaining popularity and adoption projects are springing up to ease everyday transactions like you said OP. However Coinbar Pay like Ivenpay and the likes are very good alternatives even though they seem to be aimed at a particular region. Like the CBPAY you spoke of, I don't know which country you are from but since they operate with euros, I can safely assume that they are currently targeting the EU zone.

Hopefully when Bitget list it's token potential developers from other region are inspired by thi kind of projects cos it could come in handy when you are in a haste and don't have time for P2P conversion before transactions.

Hey guys, we as a people have become accustom to the idea that only the marketers get something out of the sales of products and services. For example, Google ad, admob, Facebook ad, Twitter, Instagram etc... see users as product they sell for ads money! Recently though, there have been some key incidents that have lead me to believe that there is a push back...

Literally one of the project's that comes to mind is Push project then more recently EtherMail allowing users to earn from ads emails and engagement. Yesterday I also came across Cookie3 MarketingFi protocol which I believe is doing something similar!

They seem to be rewarding users for their engagement and contributions to projects by leveraging AI and blockchain to create a transparent and efficient marketing ecosystem using their $COOKIE token.

There seems to be a paradigm shift from the traditional approach which has led me to the question... Are developers listening more and hence developing user centric projects? Or... Users who have become developers are building projects based on their pain points?

I couldn't imagine companies generosity fueling this?

Quote from: BitHunter on May 28, 2024, 11:16:23 PM

My curiosity is, since 4% of $CWIF are automatically burned from every on-chain transaction, will this defensive mechanism automatically create scarcity by reducing supply and increase value...?

Generally speaking, with less in supply the price of a coin may increase, that is assuming that other factors are also working well accordingly because no matter if the supply is so low but the market is taking a coin to be just another shitcoin then it would be hard to prop it up higher. This is actually a very basic thing in the world of cryptocurrency and in fact anywhere in almost all industries in the world...with lesser supply a commodity can be more valuable and its price will be surging. And talking on drawbacks, I see no disadvantage with this burning of some of the supply and that is the reason why many coins even the established ones are also using burning to drive more value to their platforms...in fact there is nothing new to it and I know many new projects can also be applying this thing to their circulating supply as well.

thanks for putting things in perspective. I probably have to look into the blueprint of more tokens to get more experience but your pointers will be a good guide!

Hey guys, can I say we are in the memecoin season or Solana season? Either way there seems to be a lot of Solana memecoins lately and they are actually doing well... Considering...

Although I have followed CatWifHat from its early days in late December last year, there is something I couldn't wrap my head around. I haven't particularly bordered to ask either cause I was accumulating without selling.

My curiosity is, since 4% of $CWIF are automatically burned from every on-chain transaction, will this defensive mechanism automatically create scarcity by reducing supply and increase value...?

If yes, what are the possible drawbacks?
If no, what is the possible aim of this?

Lastly, are they the only memecoin using this logic?

Statistically, the crypto community is usually dominated by Male and this is backed by many publications indicating about 70% of the crypto community is made up of male demographic...

However, these phenomena seems to be blown out of the waters when it comes to the higher echelons in the crypto landscape and this is particularly evident in the fact that women are behind two of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges.

Both former television hosts, Binance’s Yi He and Bitget’s Gracy Chen currently lead the world’s largest crypto exchanges by volume. In a blog post published on May 21, Gracy Chen, CEO of crypto exchange Bitget, detailed her journey leading an exchange that facilitates $4 billion in trading volume.

With this two figures being isolated but exemplary examples for ladies, do you think we will see more female interests in the crypto space?

Hey guys, I know this is a long shot but here is my though progress...

Utility has been the life blood BNB and it is with this that it gained so much value. I remember once I got chosen for an airdrop and I couldn't claim it coz I didn't have any BNB for gas fee... Needless to say, I got me some so I could claim my airdrop...

With that in mind, I came across PACK which is the native token of the HashPack wallet and remembered my experience. HashPack wallet is already been used by 95% of the Hedera Chain users which is already a good market monopoly. If they were to use the PACK for gas fee, could it propel it value?

Can it generate instant intrinsic value? What are the pros and cons for doing that though?

Thanks guys!

The crypto community can be a place where you meet lots of enthusiast who are just beginning their journey in the space. While there are forum which act as cushion for soft landing and asking experienced veterans questions, platforms also play their role by creating an enabling environment for new users.

So when I saw Alltoscan, I kinda remembered when I started crypto with both FOMO and FUD 😅. But checking out services it offered and how prioritizes security with advanced measures to safeguard user data it could inspire confidence in new users.

Do you think better knowledge about DeFi and crypto in general could help transaction folks into crypto? Plus, Is Alltoscan a worthy addition to investment as they will be listing their token soon?

As blockchain technology and cryptocurrency are growing immensely, there has been a significant move on the part of developers to incorporate other real life activities. Having my little garden at home, I kinda wanted to know more about LandX Finance when I came across it yesterday...

It describes itself as a blockchain protocol that aims to introduce RWAs into the world of DeFi through Perpetual Commodity Vaults. With all the fancy words and terms, I wondered if farmers are going to be benefiting from such projects?

Who benefits more, the farmers that owns the RWAs or the crypto investors? Can farmers then directly invest in their RWAs? Will it be ethical?